this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
144 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67987 readers
3882 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KCTV) - A sight previously thought to be science fiction is very real at a southeast Kansas City shopping center. Instead of a police officer, a security robot has been patrolling sidewalks and shoppers are taking notice.

Since Marshall the robot has been on the job, shoppers say the experiences have completely changed when they come to these stores. The robot can spend 23 hours a day monitoring the parking lot from all angles which gives people a new sense of protection and ease they don’t always have when out.

Marshall took over security at Brywood Centre in April. Before that, Karen White noticed a lot of trouble outside the shopping center.

“Sometimes it’d be concerning for your car like someone could take it or something,” White said.

Knowing now that Marshall is always watching, the risk of crime does not worry her or others as much.

“It made it very better, like you can’t be in the parking lot without seeing the robot,” White continued. “So, I think it scared them off.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 months ago (2 children)

“He has a license plate reader, he has facial recognition, he can read IP addresses from your cell phone or watch,” Amanda Bellemere, owner of Brywood Shopping Centre, explained. “He knows who you are basically.”

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 months ago

Shoplifter: fuck you police toaster!

Police toaster: you jerk off to incest hentai.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago (4 children)

he can read IP addresses from your cell phone or watch

(X) Doubt

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 months ago

They mean the Bluetooth MAC address. It'll capture your phone's and can tell who the manufacturer is but the rest of the address is randomized. That said, lots of watches/earbuds/assorted smart Bluetooth things aren't randomized because manufacturers are lazy.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Depends on what your cell or watch is broadcasting publicly and if you are connected to the store wifi.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yea, no, the most likely route is to pickup a MAC address and associate it with an existing assigned IP address (If that device is connected to the public WiFi, but who even does that these days lol), but modern day Android and iOS randomize MAC addresses on every connection these days by default.

And then you'd still need to correlate that to the physical world, most likely route would be detecting Bluetooth hostname, but it's by no means guaranteed that the device hostname in the public WiFi DHCP table matches the BT one (phones can have different names for each). And again is dependent on the person being connected to store WiFi to begin with. Would also be entirely thwarted of a person's BT is off which is highly likely

It's possible, but would be a useless feature to develop and maintain as it would probably actually work out in the real world like maybe 30% of the time.

Unless they shoved a full stingray unit in it or something (extremely unlikely), this is just a statement from someone parroting a sales brochure that they didn't entirely understand

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Marshall...?

WHY DIDN'T YOU CALL IT MALL-E?!

WHY?!

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Closer to this.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Marshall conquer and destroy! Exterminate!

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Does kind of look like one, doesn't it?

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 4 points 6 months ago

This is not war this is pest control

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago

"Dead or alive, you're coming with me."

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 17 points 6 months ago

Show your receipt you have 10 seconds to comply

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

TBH, I trust a security robot way, way more than I trust the KCPD at this point.

Our police are state-controlled and don't seem to give a damn about locals, and they've shown themselves to be completely inept to stem the stream of burglaries and theft that's occurred in the city over the past year. My own car got ripped off less than a year ago, forcing me to have to replace a window, but that's small potatoes compared to what many others are experiencing.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Police don't prevent crime - their job is the grab people who commit crime.

Prevention is a much more complex issue (cultural).

Even as kids we all did shit our parents told us not to, and we just tried to not get caught.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 months ago

EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I live in Kansas City. Somebody is going to do a drive by on that thing.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

So do I, and yes, that could happen.

However, according to the article, it's been around six months now and is having a positive effect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They've seen the YouTube videos of Robocop and didn't want to get shot in their dicks.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The robot can spend 23 hours a day monitoring the parking lot from all angles

Do they get a mandated one-hour break or something?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Charging maybe? A robot’s gotta eat too.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn’t it make more sense to have removable batteries it could recharge and swap out on the fly?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I mean, maybe that hour is a human swapping batteries and giving it a light cleaning?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Thank you for your cooperation.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The headline makes it sound like people are scared to report crimes because they don’t want to talk to RoboMallCop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments