this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
602 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68599 readers
3481 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 101 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago (3 children)

ITT: omg how other people don't see what I, a very smart and superior person who browses technology communities, have known for years

we should be celebrating that privacy issues are gaining more and more mainstream coverage.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

ITT: omg how other people don't see what I, a very smart and superior person who browses technology communities, have known for years

Genuinely, who doesn't know/suspect this, do you know anyone? I don't think it's about superiority at all.

I don't know literally anyone who doesn't know or atleast expect this, even normies have the concepts of NSA/Big Brother spying on everything.

Literally even my tech illiterate parents know/suspect that you aren't private anywhere.

Edit: and if you do know anyone who is ignorant to this...will they find this article/report and read it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

No one cares about this stuff but techies/Lemmy. Regular people don't care, like at all. They know tech companies do this stuff but if convenience>privacy, most people take the former every time to make life easier. Data privacy is not a tangeable thing in most people's minds.

There would have to be some sort of cataslismic event to wake people up enough for people to do anything meaningful. I don't know what that would be, but I hope someone figures that out sooner rather than later.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't think some mass "waking up" event is going to occur, but every time another headline about it shows up, it gets more difficult to ignore or not care about it. and every time someone who's on the fence about the issue will pay more attention to it, and perhaps use the offending platform less. baby steps.

besides, I wouldn't say people don't care, they do when they get offered a choice: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/05/96-of-us-users-opt-out-of-app-tracking-in-ios-14-5-analytics-find/

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I read this and ask "What is your intention with this post?" What is gained if everyone is this jaded?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think this is true. Most people do care, in my anecdotal experience. I am not in tech circles. It is not a niche thing to be concerned about these days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Eh, most do care, they just don't do anything about it. My siblings and brothers don't like that companies like Google and Facebook harvest so much data, yet they continue using them.

So whether people care isn't a particularly interesting question, I'm more interested in what people are willing to do about it. Will they change what services they use? Would they change who they vote for (if a party actually prioritized privacy)? How much are they willing to pay to not have data harvested? And so on. Those are interesting questions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Disagree. I think everyone deserves a reasonable degree of privacy and interoperability and choice as a protected right, within the markets and services we already have.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree with that as well, I just don't think the average person puts that at the top of their voting priorities, and as such, the major candidates don't say anything about privacy when running for office.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I feel like positioning the 'average person' as always disengaged or never doing enough reads more like an attempt to define in/out groups than a genuine effort to actually do anything about the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Understanding the average person (or rather, the mode of the population on a given topic) helps to craft a strategy. If the average person doesn't prioritize privacy, the solution probably isn't to run a big campaign around a privacy bill, but to attack the issue of privacy at the fringes on things the average person does care about (e.g. right to repair for farmers, cars, and consumer devices; even abortion). You can point to privacy as being the main, underlying theme here, but focus the energy on things that actually have a chance of success.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Wow you're so smarmt

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago

That's literally the sales pitch to investors, and has been for decades.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 months ago

Yeah, no shit!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We need you Lina Khan. We need you, but stronger, faster, better. Let's fucking go.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago

In other news, the sky is blue.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

FTC says water is wet.

Edit: in all seriousness, it’s good that the FTC is talking about this, and it’ll be even better if it does something to combat it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It is fine to have casual knowledge of or a hunch about something, but far better to have the research and analysis to prove it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is why I’m slowly migrating to the Fediverse.

Fuck social media companies.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

We're watching you too.

Now, entertain us, we are bored.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Yep, all they gotta do is well, very little.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, the Fediverse isn't any more private, but at least it doesn't care much about your data. That said, any company could come and harvest all of that data if it wanted since it's open.

The Fediverse isn't the final step here.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I understand that, but it's more about the targeted advertisements, sponsored posts, etc. Just give me my goddamn content and leave me alone LOL

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Yeah no shit.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

I like that someone in a position of authority is talking about this.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

They don't say.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

NO. REALLY?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

So this is why I switched to the fediverse. But to be honest, I have no idea if someone does things like that here or not. All my posts are public to everyone and machine readable. The only thing which would prevent someone of survailing users on the fediverse is it's very small scale. It is probably just not worth the effort.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Gotta wonder why they're saying this now? What's the agenda?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The new-ish Federal Trade Commission head has been making a push to work on quite a few projects for the past couple of years. They have a very small resources and man-power compared to the war chests of multibillion dollar companies, but recently, somehow managed to bring charges against Google as a monopoly. This in my opinion is a good thing. I consider myself a social liberal and a fiscal conservative. I don’t like how our government seems to take the money of these companies and turn a blind eye as they do what they want in pursuit of the almighty dollar. I support her endeavors working for the interests of the majority of people and not those few with the most money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I don’t like how our government seems to take the money of these companies and turn a blind eye as they do what they want in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

What country do you live in?

Because in the US, the government gives money to corpos. That's how the entire regime works lol

Politicians take donations sure but that's not the government. That's private regime whores living off corporate cash while handing out state aid Boeing intel and tech companies among many other parasites.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Have you considered that the answers you seek may be in the article?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Lina Khan actually takes action against companies unlike many of her predecessors.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Getting as much done as they can before the election in case Trump wins, I think

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Rule #1: anybody who can get you to give them your information of likes, dislikes just about anything will sell it to other people, or use it for their own sales to you.

Rule #2: If anyone has any reason to make you accept terms and conditions and there's any chance that they you may want to sue them in future, they're going to slip in a binding arbitration clause unless it is legally difficult for them to do so.

Wake up FTC it's not just social media it's deeply embedded everywhere in commerce and society and it needs to be addressed RFN.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Remember, when Western companies violate privacy that is okay.

When non-Western companies do it, that's bad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. It's bad when anyone does it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Allow me to reveal my age by saying… No, duh!!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Holy shit! For real?.....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

In idiom meta for this scenario, most Lemmy users are what would be considered 'the choir'

load more comments
view more: next ›