this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
417 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68441 readers
3644 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deez@lemm.ee 158 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is the future just having a human slave in a third world country strap into VR and carry your groceries for you?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 121 points 5 months ago (4 children)

That's basically what happens right now. Remember Amazon's smart grocery store? It was just people in India watching cameras. Computer vision wasn't capable of it.

[–] orl0pl@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

AI (Anonymous Indians)

[–] Deez@lemm.ee 52 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Makes me wonder how much of Tesla’s “Full Self Driving” is just some dude playing GTA VR with you in the passenger seat.

[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If it was actually that it would work better…

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Have you seen humans drive? Now imagine them driving with significant visual and steering input latency, distorted wide angle cameras, and the lack of steering and acceleration feedback. Unless they are used to sim racing, I bet most people would drive worse than Tesla's FSD if done remotely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] indomara@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, I think the self driving taxis across the us apparently need human interaction every 6 minutes on average... So are they self driving? I don't know.

We can't use our phones and drive, but someone can have a screen and drive 6 cars at the same time...

And I only need human interaction every few days. Take that AI... :)

[–] variants@possumpat.io 2 points 5 months ago

That would probably be better than waymo

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure this story was blown out of proportion and exaggerated. These people were training and validating the automated systems not watching the cameras 24/7.

That's how AI is trained, manual intervention. It wasn't working as well as they hoped, but it wasn't humans watching cameras in real time.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/17/24133029/amazon-just-walk-out-cashierless-ai-india

[–] vzq@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It sounds like the best way to bootstrap a machine learning system. You generate the data the system will be seeing in production along with the proper labels. Then in a later stage you can start doing reinforcement learning.

The problem is the lying about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's not true at all. I personally know a person who worked on that technology.

Human beings got involved only when necessary. Do you really think Amazon wants to pay humans to be cashiers?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you really think Amazon wants to pay humans to be cashiers?

No but if they spend a bunch of money and time designing it, spend a bunch of time and money retrofitting stores, and then a bunch of time and money marketing it and the technology doesn't actually work when it's 'showtime,' I can easily see a company with deep pockets like Amazon faking it all by hiring dirt cheap labor to make it seem like it works rather than the alternative.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

But the technology does actually work.

You don't come up with an idea, announce it to the world, and then start figuring out how to implement it.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You don't come up with an idea, announce it to the world, and then start figuring out how to implement it.

Maybe in an ideal world but that's not the world we live in.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I worked at Amazon for 8 years. That's not how it works.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steak@lemmy.ca 68 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We live in a fucking nightmare. Rich assholes wining and dining with robots while most of the world fucking suffers. It's actually crazy. We are bringing into our reality what was just a bad dream like 50 years ago. This is just wild man.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 53 points 5 months ago (2 children)

All those sci-fi novels were meant as warnings not instruction manuals

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Torment Nexus

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

I'm betting my two balls that Elysium becomes a real thing

Whaaaat? A company whose market valuation is almost entirely built on a perpetual lie about automation they are delivering “someday” lied about their ability to deliver automation??

I am shocked, I tell you. Shocked.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

The people apologizing for this sort of behavior, even here, just shows how easy it is to manipulate people.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Every conference/tech showcase is carefully staged to maximize investments.

Well, often times not Tesla.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is still so weird to me. Couldn't they even lie right? Use a plastic window just for that car. Apparently it doesn't matter to tesla customers that the end product is shit.

I think the actual claim is that the truck in general is bulletproof (meaning the metal bits), not that every part of the truck is bulletproof. Here's a video testing that claim, it is bulletproof for certain calibers, but not for larger calibers.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 41 points 5 months ago

Elon Musk loves a fake presentation.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You remember the first time Musk talked about robotaxis? He never delivered. This robotaxi is another vaporware

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Maybe there's a brain in there imported from some poor country.

The real reason for the brain implant chips company… brains in jars controlling robots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

i'm expecting the first million optimus robots will be remote controlled by armies of 'trainers' and elon will claim the ai will use the footage to train itself to do everything later, but we need a trillion+ dollars of compute to achieve that, but the software and hardware required are simply not possible at any budget anytime soon. maybe its good enough to have mass remote slavery for some.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Similar to the company who just dressed up models as robots for their presentation

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I feel that almost certainly that is where Musk got the idea from, it worked for them, etc!

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He also said that it would result in an “age of abundance” where the cost of everything would drop dramatically.

This never, never, ever happens when they say it will happen. It's always the opposite. Prices go up, jobs disappear, new subscriptions appear, etc.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

It may or may not, you as a consumer will simply never see it. Any costs savings gets gobbled up.

[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Question - assuming they are human controlled, how do these compare with bots created by competitors like Boston Dynamics?

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago

They don’t. They are not competitors. This is not a product that exists as a real purchasable item. Those little robot dog toys are closer to BD than what Elon has done here.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I mean if drone pilots are cucking people and blowing them instead of blowing them up, I’ll take that as progress at this point

load more comments