this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
281 points (100.0% liked)

me_irl

5600 readers
38 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't need to feel like I've 'earned' basic resources, everyone should get those regardless of what they do so they're free to spend their life however they wish.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (7 children)

What are basic resources though? All people ever want is more. More than they had yesterday. More than the guy next door. More than Timmy whose parents took him to Disneyland in 3rd grade.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Capitalists, maybe. Most people would be happy with a quality of life equivalent to what the middle class currently experiences.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

The middle class is a term that is so nebulous it might as well be meaningless. Families making 60k/year and families making 300k a year both consider themselves middle class and those are very different lifestyle qualities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There’s plenty of research that shows people are happier when they earn more money than their coworkers. Absolute quality of life improvements don’t translate into happiness nearly as much as we’d hope.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's also plenty of research that shows that people's earnings reflect how happy they are, but only up to a certain point. Different studies have different numbers for that point but it's pretty much always above the actual median income. After that the line flattens and for some even goes down. So yeah, it's not always a direct money = happiness but you'd have to be an idiot or intentionally obtuse to say that people wouldn't be happier if they didn't have to agonize over how they'll pay their bills/save for their future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There’s no amount of money everyone can make that’ll get us all to stop agonizing over bills. Sure, billionaires today generally don’t have that worry but that’s only because they’re richer than everyone else! If everyone was a billionaire then you’d be spending billions to pay your bills.

What would make everyone happy is to achieve post scarcity as a society. The problem with that is that we’d then simply grow in population until scarcity came back. We’re never going to have infinite resources so that will always be possible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We're already post scarcity on food, housing, and medicine. So let's make those free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who is going to do all the work to make all that stuff if it’s free?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In a market economy? Government employees.

In a communist economy? People who want to, same as they did for 100,000 years before money was invented.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Government employees are going to take over the farms and grow all the food? That’s not a market economy.

Furthermore if all that stuff is free then why are people still working?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8rh3xPatEto

The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in our lives. We work to better ourselves, and the rest of humanity

- Captain Picard

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I’ve watched TNG, the entire series, many times. We’re not even close to that! We don’t have replicators, we don’t have starships to take us to new planets for unlimited land to settle.

By the way, have you ever thought about how the Picard family owns this huge wine estate in France? Not everyone in the Star Trek universe gets their own family wine estate, so Picard’s family is wealthy and privileged even in a society without money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no, they have the ability to manually produce wine in a civilisation with no money, free replicators, and a synthetic form of alcohol that doesn't give hangovers and doesn't impair your faculties in an emergency. With such extravagant wealth, they could even... checks notes... give free alcohol to wine snobs

...which, to be fair, is exactly what the Picard family does with their vineyard. They devote their time and energy to making alcohol and giving it away for free. Because they're communists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You’re thinking about it in terms of commerce. I’m talking about the luxury of a huge piece of beautiful land in the French countryside. Compare that to some basic apartment in San Francisco which probably looks like the crew quarters on the enterprise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But anyone can go to that land and walk around. The transporters are free, you can get there in minutes from any city in the entire world. The only privilege is having a bedroom with a view.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No one can walk around on Picard’s family estate. They own it! It’s private property.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Disneyland is private property but anyone can go there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They charge you money and can ban you from it at any time. Picard’s family estate is closed to the public. You can’t even go there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Watch the show (S4E02: “Family”). At what point do you see thousands of tourists walking around, eating grapes, sampling wine, running through the vineyard, playing frisbee? Right, you don’t see it at all because the place is closed.

Now look at a public beach in China and see what it’s like when a place is open to the public (and this one not even the whole world, just China):

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It isn't really that hard to see a natural place for "basic" to be defined. The points where peoples lives go off a cliff for lack of something simple are clearly visible: becoming homeless and losing shelter from the elements/violent people, being denied access to life saving medical care, not getting enough calories/nutrients of food to live.

Basic resources are the fence at the edge of that slope which leads to death. That not everyone gets them no matter what is a failure of humanity.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Well the resources required to not die seems like something we should all be able to agree on at least.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

I mean, if you're a dickhead, maybe

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yep. That's how it really works. Lemmy thinks money equals happy. I was far happier at $45K than at $83K. Depends.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Then give 38 thousand dollars to charity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Basic resources I.e. food, shelter, and the most basic public services such as libraries, firefighting, policing, comprehensive healthcare, and internet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Only people that are mentally ill. Which wouldn't happen if we actually invested in the wellbeing of our community. I honestly see no point in being so rich if I have to inhabit such a shit environment. Sadly most rich assholes chose to isolate, rather than invest in their surrounding. It's a bit of a shit loop.

I like Swiss trans as an example. Because they're soo good, rich people use em, which means more investment (money and effort) goes in, which means more rich people use public transit. It's the same loop but in reverse.

On a side note I always find it funny seeing presidents on the news commute. In Europe, often enough they have like 2 people accompany them as they just fucking walk next to regular citizens, meanwhile in the US, Russia and China, anybody hopping the designated perimeter gets tackled.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Get born to rich parents and you can have all that. Case in point: dipshit Elon.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That post is lemmy in a nutshell.

Don't want to work.

Don't want responsibilities.

Want to feel good about myself, even with no reason to feel good about myself.

"But capitalism and communism and, and, and, I just want free shit and the billionaires are taking it from me!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Feels like you're being intentionally facetious but yeah I pretty much agree with all that. I think the nuance is that most people don't want to work jobs but would likely occupy themselves with their passions if their basic needs were guaranteed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Maybe I'm weird but I've never in my life had a passion for anything. Don't get me wrong, I've had things I'll be vaguely interested in. But I think certain personalities are more inclined to have passion and other personalities are more inclined to be a bit blasé through life. I've always been more of the latter and I know I am not the only one on the planet who is this way.

That doesn't mean that I'm in a bad spot in life and I'm not interested in changing careers. I have a good job that pays very well and that can be vaguely interesting. For a blasé individual, it's the best I could hope for lmao.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

David Graeber says that half of all jobs are bullshit and completely unnecessary. I wish we could admit it and move on. Life would be so much more fulfilling if there were only half as much work to do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

It wouldn't be like that if we could work on something that makes sense to us. But no, we have to desperately find whatever is valuable enough to some rich dickwad that has no clue and then kiss their ass doing shit poorly their way. My work would be a million times better if my suggestions weren't always shut down on the basis of "well, I'm above you, and I made this decision before you, so suck it", especially when it's a system only I have to interact with and is trivial to remake.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Someone has to work. Someone has to produce. If you don’t want to work and yet reap the rewards off of the backs of others that have have wrought, then you’re no better than a leech. A parasite. A drag on society.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

punctuation is important, but you can still make sense of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

jokes on you, existence is pain! Life is a torment nexus! And it always has been, some of us just realized it sooner.