this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31764 readers
801 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What does it take in terms of assets, abilities, and/or income for you to consider them wealthy?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It's always "wealthier than us", isn't it?

But I'd say whenever you have no money worries, that's wealthy. Like you could retire today if you wanted and not just survive but buy a new car or house if you wanted to, go on a long vacation, anything that just needs money to do is within your reach. Never have to say no simply because of money. That is what I define as wealth (financial wealth) and it's different amounts in different places.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Anyone who has strong opinions about new video games or a favourite Tiktoker is wealthy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

In general I would say you're rich if you could stop working and live a life where you never want for anything

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can cure rich with a weekend in Vegas, Wealth is terminal.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Which kind of rich do you mean? The 'this person is truly wealthy but it's not unreasonable' or 'this person is unacceptably rich and should have their money taken away if not worse'?

The former can be somewhere around....$10,000,000 or so. Lower the older the person is really (cause I consider rich versus remaining expected lifespan), so maybe even as low as $6,000,000 for someone who's currently 40.

The latter where it's simply unacceptable for people to have that much I'd start the cutoff around $400,000,000 or so.

And slight sidenote on the unacceptable levels: Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos both are so unacceptably wealthy that they could make one person a day wealthy by my $10,000,000 standard...every day...for 100 years...before running out (and that's assuming they stopped accruing money at the beginning of this)...and still be unacceptably wealthy to a crazy degree.

Oh and all my numbers are assuming no additional income and definitely no interest or investment (but also assuming the money remains the same value it has today).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I guess what would it take for you to look at yourself and conclude that you're rich?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

For me, given my age and all...five million.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

$500,000 combined household gross income

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Anyone with a net worth listed on their wikipedia page.

Anyone who can lose several million dollars at work and might still have a job the next day.

Anyone who can damage fancy clothing and think "I'll just get a new one."

Anyone who can have a holiday abroad every year. Especially if they have a summer home.

Anyone who gets surprised when they find out someone has never been skiing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Anyone who gets surprised when they find out someone has never been skiing.

That depends on culture a lot. In Austria it's actually rare to find someone who has never been skiing (25% of the population go skiing regularly, and that has already been at around 50% not many years ago). Even when not doing it with your family while growing up everyone learns it at school.

I'm not rich at all but I do get surprised when someone who isn't obviously from another country has never been skiing (typically it means that they grew up somewhere else but you just don't notice anymore).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Living in London and working in the City so long really skewed my view on this. I guess because I worked with so many people earning six figures (and double that for household income) who were still very much "workers", were paying off the mortgage and hated commuting like anyone else. They didn't seem rich to me. Maybe if they sold up and moved out of town, sure, but just trying to live day to day they were counting the cost like an average person just up-scaled.

I feel like being able to live off passive income / interest AND living where you want is where "rich" starts for me. I could live off passive income now, in a basic place far from London but I'm not "rich". I can live pretty much where I want in London, but I'd have to continually work for it. Being able to do either of these things would put me in many people's "rich" bracket but for me it's when you can do both at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

As if to prove your point on London, this is timely...https://www.ft.com/content/fa6fdb8e-c36e-4854-8b3a-1552ab41f217

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

You're not really wealthy until you can raise your own legion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Wealthy and rich have nothing to do with one another.

Wealthy is a person that lives in a stable environment, where they aren't threatened with death on a regular basis (such as, losing one's job).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

If they own a house, make at least 100k a year and can support their family comfortably, I would consider that wealthy. My father is in this bracket and he goes on vacations over seas, owns 3 relatively expensive vehicles, and still saves enough for retirement.

You don't need a million dollars to live a rich, fulfilling life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I think calling Bezos rich is an understatement. My mind cannot comprehend the amount of wealth he has.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

A wealthy man has no bills

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›