this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025

406 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

7332 readers

8 users here now

Rule #1: Be civil

Rule #2: No spam, memes, off-topic, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #3: No advertisements

Rule #4: No streams, random gameplay videos, highlights, or shorts

Rule #5: No erotic games or porn

Rule #6: No facilitating piracy

Rule #7: No duplicates

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

workerONE@lemmy.world

406

Valve dev says SteamOS isn't about killing Windows: 'If a user has a good experience on Windows, there's no problem' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 3 months ago by ElfWord@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.world

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"All of this work is broadly applicable to the PC platform, and it’s going to continue to expand over time. Supporting multiple platforms, multiple chipsets, controllers for different machines that are out there and even ones that aren’t out yet."

[...] Valve's goal with the OS is to have it compatible with traditional PCs, laptops, portable consoles and any other formats.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] EvilCartyen@feddit.dk 126 points 3 months ago (2 children)

OK, we'll, we're not having a great experience on windows, are we?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 65 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's what they're implying

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So there IS a problem, valve 😡

[–] RedditRefugee69 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's called diplomacy sweaty, look it up.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Replace Windows with masochism. If someone enjoys masochism, who are we to stop them?

[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

This is really nice comparison. Using windows really is a masochism, not only in terms of suffering you take but also having this huge dominant corpo figure inflicting said suffering with new inventive methods day by day.

[+] kitnaht@lemmy.world 84 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Just like Microsoft crushed the iPod with Zune or Sony with XBox.

Valve is big enough and entrenched enough—and MS fucks up consumer stuff enough—that I doubt they are really at risk of being crushed.

And MS failed at crushing Linux or the major Linux vendors even during the SCO phase.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Microsoft would have a hard time crushing the biggest gaming store in the industry. I think this is more of a "don't fuck around or you'll find out" from Valve to Microsoft.

Valve is put in a weak position if they're entirely reliant on Windows. Having another option that grows in market share puts them on better negotiating footing, should the need arise.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Nah, I agree with the above poster. Valve is treading lightly because it's still in a weak position. Also if there's one thing I'm sure of in this world is that microsoft are genuinely evil, and they will do everything to crush opposition. They have the resources, the time, heck, they probably have an army of lawmakers in their pockets too. They're probably being more benevolent because it's cheaper than all out war ( see sony ). They're probably working an EEE angle that I can't figure out.

They invested 11 figure numbers in xbox and windows gaming at this point, they won't let that escape. I suspect it's even possible that they would somehow convince Valve to drop Linux support if it got too much for their taste. Who knows what the relationship is these days between Gabe and his former employer.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

On this topic, it's not about the money (getting paid off, or absorbed) for valve - they will continue their linux projects because the only goal is ensuring they have somewhere to sell games if MS went nuclear. While the immediate threat of windows store monopoly has subsided, SteamOS as a whole is a contingency plan over everything else, since the beginning.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

More than that, by diversifying Valve is getting insurance from Microsoft bad mood in 2 ways

If the experience gets shitty because Microsoft manipulate Valve and games into making gamers getting bad experience, they can say "works just fine in my steam deck"

And if they try to do the "30% subscription/marketplace tax" that iOS and Android pull on devs they can go rogue and say it's cheaper on steam deck/Linux which would also cause a big kerfuffle

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Don't underestimate the power of the darkside.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft will start doing everything in their power to drown it out as fast as possible

Everything, except making a more attractive OS

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Or, like their entire business model for the last decade or two, they're focused on competing at a service level rather than trying to push everyone out of the market by force.

Microsoft has made sure to make their library of games available on Steam for a reason. They know they can't... or won't compete at a service level.

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I miss the crazy Steve balmer days

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 72 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That’s pretty much the difference of philosophy in a nutshell.

Microsoft: We gotta kill the competition.

Valve: We gotta make our customers happy.

[–] gray@pawb.social 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Valve makes money whether you use windows or Linux - that’s probably more their attitude.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 64 points 2 months ago

Do your thing Valve. Linux has been around for 30 years. It's a marathon to 70% marketshare, not a sprint.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s funny in a way, seeing as how Gabe Newell was at Microsoft from ~’83 until ‘96, working on the early versions of Windows.

Makes sense though - to see what subsequent teams have done to your original project, and feel the need to ‘right those wrongs’.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Windows: 95
Gabe: imma head out

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] peto@lemm.ee 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

SteamOS is all well, and good, but does it have a dedicated button to launch an AI app (but not the one you can use at work) that can be reprogrammed to only do other things that also don't need a dedicated button? I think not. Check and mate Gabe.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the other thing that drives me nuts about steamos is that it doesn’t even come with a dedicated chat button pinned in the bottom bar. and even if it did, i bet it would support work accounts and personal accounts. windows knows exactly what i want, which is a giant button that only supports personal accounts for the chat program is literally only ever used for work

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Dumbass steamOS doesn't even remind me that I don't have Edge set to my default browser lmao what a shit OS

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It other words they are saying be better or we will destroy you.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're saying that they won't even have to try.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

SteamOS: You're saying I can destroy Windows?

Gabe as Morpheus: No, SteamOS. I'm saying when you're ready, you won't have to.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

The way they're talking about this it'll probably end up running any non-server computer I build - I am SO sick of Microsoft and it's "Fuck you, customer slave" attitude.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They say that as if trying to kill Windows is a bad thing.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Saying that out loud would be quite dmging for a company with predominantly Windows user base.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’s about having a plan B incase MS starts locking in the customers into their own gaming services.

Tim Sweeney warned about this when they tried to push the Windows Store on Windows 10.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

All this talk about a gaming centric operating system "replacing" one designed to handle everything is just ridiculous.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Inb4 Microsoft sues Valve for using Wine in SteamOS.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Iirc there's already a legal precedent that says copyright doesn't apply to APIs themselves, just their implementations, so reverse engineering one to make your own implementation is fair game. I think the original lawsuit was even about wine.

Though it is possible my memory archives are corrupted.

[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I do remember the oracle vs Google lawsuit.

Google's copying of the Java SE API, which included only those lines of code that were needed to allow programmers to put their accrued talents to work in a new and transformative program, was a fair use of that material as a matter of law. Federal Circuit reversed.

From the wikipedia article about it

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Gaming on windows is about gaming on the os I already have for work/non gaming entertainment. I'm not out choosing different os like buying a new shirt or something.

If my gaming handheld came with steam os that's fine because I'm not doing productivity work on there.

These days I barely interact with the os outside of clicking the icons to open things. Os have become increasingly desktop only environments. I barely even use the start menu anymore.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

These days I'm trying to remember what I found so useful with the start menu back on XP and 7. Maybe the problem is Microsoft making it less useful and full of ads.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Everybody here is debating whether Valve is trying to crush windows.

I took it more to mean that Valve realizes that Windows is the dominant PC OS and so they're trying not to appear as if their goal is to crush Windows, on account of how if that's their goal Microsoft could just make Steam inaccessable on Windows.

Now you could argue that there will be a patch, and a hack and blah blah blah the average user ain't got time fo none-a-dat!

User installs steam. Windows blocks installation. 70% of users just give up. "Oh, I guess this only runs on steamdeck. Oh well."

And just like that Valve loses 100% of potential purchases from that average windows user who hasn't even done so much to their system as changing the theme.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

Personally, I think Valave has no reason to try to compete with Windows right now, regardless. Steam has a market capture that the Xbox store could only dream of, even with gamepass, and SteamOS expands their market into new areas outside of the Windows PC group.

I could also see a Streisand effect/TikTok to Red Note if Microsoft tried to prevent people from installing Steam where they draw more attention to SteamOS and people start jumping ship for other options - whether that's SteamOS or not.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] noverby@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Correct the purporse isn't killing Windows, it is just a neat side-effect

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Considering Windows actively screws with steam's launcher & screws up your gaming experience Well..........

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Windows actively screws with steam's launcher

I haven't heard about this. What are they doing?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

if there's a good user experience on Windows, there's no problem

Oof burn

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is a user has a good experience with windows, this user needs his or her head examined. Alternatively, put this user behind glass and exhibit him or her in a museum.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

So Valve is Trying to make a Alternative Platform and not to rely on Microsoft, I see.

load more comments