this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

32871 readers
1552 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example, why do we say "Your pupils are dilated". They aren't. It's the iris aperture that is dilated.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I mean we have lots of words for varying degrees and styles of "nothing".

A chasm is the empty space between two chunks of the earths crust.

A void is just an empty space well... Void of all things.

An interval is just the time between two events. Technically it's nothing.

Still a good shower thought. There aren't a ton of words dedicated to the same phenomenon, but we have a handful.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty good number of them if you count things like intermission. Slit, slot, crack, aperture, interlude, gap, breach, etc. Others, too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

When I said "handful" I more so meant in all of language yeah there are probably hundreds of words for the empty space between certain things, but in all of human language that's probably a pretty small number.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also just

“Space” as a place to go

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Good ol fashion space.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Well, well, well, indeed.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is a great point! Humans can put names on things that aren't there, such as holes!

This 'naming of hole-like concepts' may sound trivial, but there have been entire cultures that didn't have 'hole-like' concepts and this stunted their ability to make certain discoveries. For example, the ancient Greeks could not have developed calculus; they did not have a concept of zero that they could use for mathematical manipulation. This shows an unfortunate reality: you can't mentally manipulate ideas that you don't have.

However, once you do have those ideas, they may seem obvious. This is a well documented human bias: the curse of knowledge. Once you understand something, it is very difficult to imagine not knowing that. For us, knowers of pupils, holes, zeros, and chasms, it may seem absurd to not have names for pupils, holes, zeros, and chasms. We take them for granted, when in reality it was not an easy road to arrive at them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Really makes ya think what obvious things we might be missing. Maybe all you need to make FTL travel possible is to dinglepop all your schleem using a household plumbus?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh boy. Don’t look too deep into philosophy of language, or you might become convinced that “the iris” is just as nonexistent — or that all nouns are really about a symbolic existence as a relationship, for which measurable physical matter is inconsequential.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I too enjoy peyote on occasion.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

A hole is a thing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Same situation with assholes and anal sphincters.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I think both the hole and sphincter are included in "asshole". It's a packaged deal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Except don't we usually mean the sphincter itself when we say asshole?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that the same as iris and pupil?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn't think so? When I say Iris, I mean the colored ring. When I say pupil, I mean the hole. When I say asshole, I mean the ring, not the hole. I can't remember ever wanting to refer to the actual hole. Maybe "gape?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

When I say asshole I usually mean someone with whom I'm currently dissatisfied

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Could it not be said that "nothing" is actually a thing? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
  • Me, trying to persuade my philosophy prof that by not turning in my assignment, I have actually turned in an assignment.
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Null and zero are two different things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In programming, for sure. But that's just the semantics of the language you're using.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

What about this:

  • Unicorns actually existed but went extinct, that would be a population count of 0.
  • If they never existed and are purely fictional (preposterous!), one could argue their count was null.
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Never call someone a massive asshole, call them massless.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well yes, but also no.

The term pupil is used to describe an area that exists inside a three dimensional space, the eye, and while that space may not have anything that reflects light, it does contain something. The surface of the eye, known as the lens, and the liquid or 'jelly' that is contained inside the eye. So that area that is light reflective material would include the whites and the iris, but the inside of the eye is not just empty space. If it was, your eye would collapse like an uninflated beach ball, and you wouldn't see very much at all. Arguably the term pupil is used to refer to the non-reflective area of the eye bordered by the iris and containing the lens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd say it's more than just a hole. I had an eye injury when I was a teenager that caused a detached iris. I didn't have a massive pupil, I had 2 small, irregularly shaped pupils. After surgery, I now have a permanently dilated pupil shaped like a teardrop

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, does a different shaped pupil change your vision? I equate a pupil to a camera lens aperture; the smaller it gets, the less light gets through. Have you noticed a difference?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Well after all these years I've gotten used to it, but my vision is very blurry in that eye. There's also injury to the macula so there's a giant gray spot in my near vision. It's kinda like a giant peripheral vision, but I'm also more sensitive to big changes in brightness

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait until I tell you about this weird concept, the zero…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I'll have none of your witchcraft here, thank-you-very-much.