politics

I have to disagree.

Even if you are right on the Dem messaging (and I'm willing to concede that point to some degree), then your conclusion would make sense against a more traditional Republican candidate. But the problem is that this is Trump, who was campaigning on actively making everything worse. Like he and Musk were outright telling people they were going to "inflict hardship". Staying home knowing you're de-facto allowing Trump to return to power after that campaign is a case of knowing that you are about to shoot yourself in the foot, pulling the trigger anyway, then reloading the shotgun when you realize you missed some toes.

And I do believe that it was almost entirely racially motivated. First, much like I said above, the other excuses given don't make sense because Trump was an objectively worse option on every subject. Not just status quo. Worse. By far. You're against Biden and Harris's support for Israel, so you're gonna vote for the guy who wants to basically glass Gaza for funzies? You think the economy sucks, so you're going to vote for the guy randomly slinging around tariffs and telling you to expect years of hardship? None of it makes sense.

But think of how many cultures that exist in our society that are incredibly patriarchal. Some people from the middle east, for example. I know a lot of bigoted Latino people who would never consider a woman his equal, and many in the Latino community are distrustful of cops. No chance in hell you're going to get them to vote for a former prosecutor at all, let alone a black and/or female one. You have some of these religious sects where the man is the head of the family and makes all the decisions. And there are plenty of racist Democrats. They just don't wear it as a badge of honor like Republicans do these days. Look at it this way. Diversity initiatives across the country are basically being treated like battery acid right now, and I don't exactly see a whole hell of a lot of Democrats standing up to defend them. Why did nobody care when literally dozens of prominent Republicans endorsed Harris, but suddenly lost their collective shit when Liz Cheney did? Gee, I wonder what makes her different from all of the other prominent Republicans. Why is it that after screaming for months about "Old man bad" and demanding that Democrats don't put up another old white guy, the first thing they did was immediately forget about age and throw their support behind an even older white guy as soon as Harris was at the top of the ticket?

I stand firm in my belief that it was racially motivated. Age wasn't the problem; they were OK with Bernie Sanders. The messaging wasn't the problem. Again, she and Bernie Sanders support the same policies even if Sanders is more ambitious about getting there. The people had no problems with the message. They just didn't like the messenger. I wonder what separates her from the other two guys......ohhhh.

So go right ahead and tell me, you great political genius, why did the dems lose? What was so bad about Kamala Harris that allowing Trump to return to power was a viable option? How does allowing Trump to return to power in any way benefit anybody? Name one flaw Kamala Harris had that was so bad that Trump wasn't explicitly campaigning on being exponentially worse?