this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
753 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22161 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 162 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

James Carville is a person nobody should take advice from ever again.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 82 points 3 weeks ago (25 children)

Carville needs to 'strategically retreat' back into whatever Louisiana snake hole he slithered out of.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I dont think people give early family guy enough credit for shitting on conservatives

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Democrats seem to have come up with two strategies so far: either (1) wait and hope someone does something, or (2) play dead and hope someone does something.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

You forgot collect donations

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dude hasn't been correct about how to win elections since 30 years ago, and hasn't been correct about policy ever.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And then he won because he was running Bill "I don't literally hate black and gay people" Clinton against a proven liar who tanked the economy, in an America that cared about those things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago

I don't usually take advice from fucking fossils. Sanders is the exception.

Seriously, Carville is fucking 80, hasn't he been myopically dictating the direction of this useless fucking party long enough?

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 135 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You know, Kristen, when Abraham Lincoln was in Gettysburg, looking out on the field with so many had died to defend freedom, he talked about a vision of America where we have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. What we have right now in Washington, let me be very clear, is a government of the billionaire class, by the billionaire class and for the billionaire class.

What a banger of a quote

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

“Let me be very clear” is such a Bernie-ism.. even unattributed, it’s so easy to tell that it’s him.

Truly a global loss that he was never given a fair chance to challenge for the Presidency.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 121 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

One of the main architects of the status quo democrats thinks democrats need to respond to getting stomped by maintaining the status quo? Color me shocked.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 45 points 3 weeks ago

The Democrat Party and the Republican Party have never been at odds in their position that their political donors should run the government.

The parties have largely just been the vehicles for turning corruption into legislation. Now that open corruption is legal, there's no need to upset the cart, the Democrats are just waiting their turn.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 99 points 3 weeks ago

"What we have right now in Washington, let me be very clear, is a government of the billionaire class, by the billionaire class, and for the billionaire class."

Get some Bernie

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago

Bro, let's try throwing away one more principle, bro. Just one more. Bro, one, please, one more, bro. Just one. Then we'll get votes again. Bro. Just one, bro. One principle. Bro.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Let the bus continue to accelerate off the cliff, then the Republican voters will be mad at the driver!" says the corporat Dems sitting on the bus.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

I would add, says the corporate Dems, sitting on the bus with a parachute made of money.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sanders channels Lincoln while Carville channels a possum—guess which inspires voters?

🐱🐱🐱🐱

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a little out of the loop, what are all the cat faces in the comments about?

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The cat emojis represent a playful ranking system inspired by "MeowMeowBeanz" from Community.

Short clip of the episode: https://youtu.be/CI4kiPaKfAE

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol love it, though I'd like to see the conclusion of the old guy's rant so I'm only going to give it 4/5 meowmeowbeanz.

🐱 🐱 🐱 🐱

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Carville is a DNC talking head moron and always has been. If we're taking advice from that idiot we're in even worse shape than we thought.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As usual, Bernie is spot on.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And, as usual, Carville is a grifting neoliberal coasting on winning one election against an unpopular president 32 years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Smack Pelosi out of her seat. Let AOC take over.

[–] frankpsy@lemm.ee 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The trees the New York Times is printed on wishes they were toilet paper instead.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats: .... maybe if we do more neck exercises we can learn to stretch our necks more so that we can send our heads further into the hole in the ground we've been using

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

After the 2016 election, until the 2024 election, the Democrats won every election of every National political body except the House in 2022. It was a solid run electorally.

You can complain about what those political bodies accomplished, but not that they didn't win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adm@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is our main advocate still ancient? Is there no one younger willing to take this fight?

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

There are, but the media does not want to spread their message

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Juice@midwest.social 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This guy was screaming and yelling about how Trump was a fascist, and if you didn't vote democrat then that was equivalent to doing nothing in the face of fascism, or worse.

Not saying there aren't elements of fash in trumps admin, there obviously are; or that abstaining to vote was the correct strategy, I don't believe it was, though uncommitteds and 3rd party voters shouldn't be shamed for following their conscience

Just want to point out where these arguments actually originate, and where exactly they have lead. Maybe there is more to politics than handwringing and rending of garments about impending fascism -- maybe politics is something you do and not something you think or, god forbid, repeat uncritically.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This guy was screaming and yelling about how Trump was a fascist, and if you didn't vote democrat then that was equivalent to doing nothing in the face of fascism, or worse.

Yeah, and he was correct. As we are literally witnessing in real time.

Whatever stupid bullshit the man said before or since isn't relevant to the validity of that statement. I don't care if Ted fucking Bundy said it, it would still be true.

That's not how logic works. You don't get to just completely ignore a premise because you don't like a person who might have said it once.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This comment was downvoted more than upvoted, but it hits the nail on the head. In fact, the final argument about politics needing to be done is exactly counter to the thing Bernie objects to: playing dead or doing nothing. How do people fail to get this point?

Wake up, dems. Your party has abandoned you. All signs from inside point at centrality and forcing out the Left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This guy was screaming and yelling about how Trump was a fascist, and if you didn't vote democrat then that was equivalent to doing nothing in the face of fascism, or worse.

The headline names two guys. Which are you talking about.

Not saying there aren't elements of fash in trumps admin, there obviously are

"elememts of" is massively underselling it.

or that abstaining to vote was the correct strategy, I don't believe it was, though uncommitteds and 3rd party voters shouldn't be shamed for following their conscience

The exasperation comes from the fact that from a historical and mathematical perspective, voting for the Democratic nominee in the general is the only way to not have a Republican win the race. And in spite of that reality slapping us in the face over and over again the 3rd party voters and non-voters won't budge. They could stop the rightward slide of the Democratic party by just showing up en masse in the primaries.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I saw a lot of people saying it was worth not voting for Kamala, because it would "teach the democrats a lesson". They said "If we refuse to vote for them, they'll have to step up their game!"

Are you people happy? Do you think the Democrats are losing more right now than America's trans people, or the Ukrainians, or the Gazans are? Do you think playing Chicken with fascism was worth it?

[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Give it a break. Do you see Bernie out there doing this shit?

Maybe take his lead and look to the future instead of the past.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wake me up when Bernie Sanders has a better plan than talking the Republicans to death

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

k, and you wake me when the centrists stop taking bribes from big donors and ignoring their job entirely.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Better than sleeping

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

Strategic retreat... Cajun style.

load more comments