this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40568 readers
778 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Im looking for something that isn’t gender specific but carries the same inherent disdain that “techbro” has.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 months ago (3 children)

By their nature, techbros are exclusionary toward women/other genders.

So, no gender-neutral term is necessary.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

What a ridiculous take

You're saying there's no women at all perpetuating enshittification, corporate surveillance, social media propaganda, and targeted advertising? Literally not a single woman, among the hundreds of thousands of people working in tech?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd argue that Elizabeth Holmes fits the bill as a female tech-bro.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Women who work in tech are wayyy more likely to be victims of techbros than actually be techbros.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Ok, that's completely irrelevant

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Identity policies at work.

It doesn't matter what you do, it only matters what labels do you have.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago (2 children)

STEM-cel

like incel, but for technogarchs

or "technogarch", I guess

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I like this one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Oh that sounds good, and it makes sense from a linguistic POV.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd say techbro is pretty gender neutral, in the same way "dude" and "guys" are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I only fuck bros, dudes and guys.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

“Who’s the dude in your relationship, and who is the bro?”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

This is the real one

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This makes me realize that I never saw a non-male techbro. Somehow the techbro crowd seems to mostly consist of young men.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fair point. Yeah that fits exactly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Literally the only one I could come up with, though, so it doesn't take away from your point

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You must not live near Silicon Valley. There's plenty of female tech bros.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I'm Dutch, so pretty far away yeah

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Tech-douche works for me.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's already gender neutral, and when the term has inherent disdain being gender neutral is pointless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah it's like the guy in Wyoming who passed an anti-trans law saying that it's not required to use preferred pronouns to refer to somebody and then getting all upset when he was called "madam" and whining that his preferred pronoun is "chairman". That leopard eating your face must hurt.

Even if there were some woman as hellbent on destroying civilization as these guys, then she's a techbro. And if she gets mad about being called techbro because she's a woman? Well, how sad for her. "My heart goes out to you"

We're not trying to make them happy. Fuck them, fuck them all. If it makes them mad to be called a "bro" good, that's a bonus.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

I personally go with fuckwit

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

"this asshole"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Techdouche Techtwat Techfash Technazi Scum

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cunt, some may not agree. But it is an apt description of everyone tearing apart our country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Everyone is a cunt, it’s a vague description of any person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Thats a solid point

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Stupid asshole?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Chucklefuck.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Sam Alt-them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Considering Tech bro isn't clearly defined it's unlikely that there is a proper word for it.

The closest I would say is probably nerd being used as an insult, or a tech trendist, but I'm hoping some other people can chime in as well cuz I might have missed something

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This thread is basically "Please help me brainstorm pejoratives", a very toxic mindset to have.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Being nice to everyone all the time is a recipe for evil to take over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No this is an attempt to not misgender someone while dismissing their stupid opinion.

For example if I replied to your comment “OK guy, that’s a totally valid read of my post” I could be misgendering you. That is why Im instead replying “OK buddy, that’s a totally valid take and you are absolutely in a place to judge others” as Im not looking to misgender you just to dismiss your opinion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're confused. I said "this thread" and not "The OP".

If you read the comments, do you see a frank discussion of people attempting to locate a gender neutral term for a tech enthusiast or a bunch of people just riffing insulting terms?

Regardless, to address you specifically. You're trying to "win" an argument using rhetoric in place of reason. You're not winning the argument, you're just throwing a punch and declaring victory.

You win arguments by having better arguments, not by coming up with the best clever clapback so that you get more upvotes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

"This is techbro nonsense" is shorthand for "this is false for reasons 1, 2, 3 describing what techbros think". Just like "this is racist" is shorthand for "this is false for reasons 1, 2, 3 describing what racists think". Why should we waste time explaining in detail again and again what's wrong with an argument when there are simple words that encompass it all? KevinOfficeWords.jpg

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Technofeudalist

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No! Nerds are cool, and I like them a lot!

How about "fuckwit"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like nerds, too. OP is the one who hates nerds.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

All techbros are nerds, but not all nerds are techbros.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Biological AI?

load more comments
view more: next ›