this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
215 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67151 readers
3668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 204 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Lemme guess, Starlink will magically be suggested.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. It's grift. They want a privatized solution.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty much every GPS-capable device made in the last decade uses all systems available: GPS (USA), GLONASS (Russia), and Galileo (EU).

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

For those who are unfamiliar with it:

GLONASS (ГЛОНАСС, IPA: [ɡɫɐˈnas]; Russian: Глобальная навигационная спутниковая система, romanized: Global'naya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema, lit. 'Global Navigation Satellite System') is a Russian satellite navigation system operating as part of a radionavigation-satellite service.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We're too dependent on a technology that we spent tens of billions of dollars researching and perfecting over decades of research!

Possibly the dumbest statement I've heard this week.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not as dumb as you make it out. The issue isn't that GPS is really, really good at what it does; it's that it's also incredibly vulnerable to disruption and spoofing. And due to the particulars of how GPS works, we can't entirely fix that. We can do some things to ameliorate it, but a lot of those aren't suitable for smaller things that use GPS today.

The other thing is that GPS largely replaced a tremendous number of other navigation aides and techniques, including other radio-navigation systems like LORAN-C.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's also just a generally bad idea to be too dependent on a single system. If GPS reception fails for one reason or another, it would be good idea to have a backup.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

It’s also just a generally bad idea to be too dependent on a single system.

You're saying this in the world where SMS is considered good for 2FA, and PSTN identifier is considered as good as your citizen's ID, and people's lives depend on systems incorporating NodeJS and Kubernetes. Yeah, by the way, Docker everywhere, and all the POSIX standardization and source-compatibility to allow different systems adhering to standards ... have lost to Linux just becoming another main target.

But yes! It's a bad idea. Also it's typical now for these systems to start lying in warzones where their owners don't want one of the sides to have satellite navigation. They then give shift maps or whatever to the side they want to win.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nah the idea is sound. As someone else said, GPS is incredibly fragile. Also very terrestrial...it doesn't work once you leave the atmosphere.

This will probably be another SpaceX grift, but there are alternative technologies that are more resilient to attack. From military/defense perspective (the original reason for GPS), that's pretty important.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

GPS is incredibly fragile.

No, not really. The GPS signal isn't designed to penetrate concrete, no. But that doesn't make it fragile.

Also very terrestrial…it doesn’t work once you leave the atmosphere.

Considering it was never meant to...that's really not that goddamn weird. It's a global positioning satellite system. So clearly for it to work you have to be on the fuckin' globe...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Having functional GPS in a tunnel would be very nice...as someone who drives through Boston and fucking hates tunnels.

But that's not what I meant by fragile. I meant it can be disrupted/jammed fairly trivially.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Having functional GPS in a tunnel would be very nice

In a tunnel

a tunnel

tunnel

I fear for the world. You afraid that you're gonna make a wrong turn? Inside of a tunnel? A fuckin' tunnel my guy?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

You have clearly never driven on 93 through Boston where the person you replied to said they are from (aka the Big Dig). It is basically an entire highway that is underneath the city. There are many on and off ramps, lanes suddenly become exit only, complex multi-lane exits that branch...it's intimidating. As somebody that has lived in the Boston area for 15 years now, I still mess things up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Global Positioning System, I sleep
Universal Positioning System, real shit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In comes starlink to the rescue. But in typical Musk fashion it won't doesn't do what's advertised and cost a shit ton more

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's literally him convincing someone to sell their house that they own outright to rent from him because it's somehow much better (for him of course). It's so fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember that time he claimed Teslas windows were shatterproof and indestructable. Then he throws a baseball and the window instantly shatters?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Was a ball bearing. Same guy threw a baseball a couple years ago and it didn't break.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

GPS depends on a friendly spectrum. I suspect the FCC is preparing for a war where GPS will be jammed, faked, or destroyed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You know what's a great backup? The ability to read a map or use a compass. This is set up to get Starlink or another billionaire to own GPS.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ding ding ding. This is just a talking point so they’ll be able to pivot into “we should give Musk a trillion dollar contract to run GPS on his Starlink satellites.” Hammer the “GPS is unreliable” point long enough that the conservative voters have time to start believing it. Then pivot into handing more money to Musk. It’s a typical advertising strategy; Create a problem so you can sell the solution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What if we built a system of beacon transmitters that sent out pulses and then used recievers that would compare arrival times of those pulses to make a measurement, thus establishing positional location?

We could call it the Long Range something or other. I’m open to suggestions. Need a catchy name!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They’re describing LORAN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

We can’t rely on the Global(ist) Positioning System!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

How do we call these assholes and tell them to get their heads out of Muskovitch's ass?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wonder if they want to track all phones with a different system.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Don't need GPS to track phones. You triangulate the receivers.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lmao what a fucking dipshit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like this guy couldn't find his own ass with two hands, a compass and a GPS receiver.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Time to bust out the compass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Triangulation could be more efficient than GPS, in terms of energy use and such

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Triangulation of what, exactly? GPS already triangulates your position based on what it receives from multiple satellites, yeah?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Triangulation of GPS signals is what allows the System to determine your Position Global(ly)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Phones already do that with cell towers. It's called A-GPS (augmented GPS). Cell towers, wifi, and even bluetooth, are used in addition to GPS/GLONASS/Galileo signals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

GPS literally triangulates your position using 3 satellites. It's how it works.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

They should use that in GPS! /s

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Too often, the vertical location (Z-axis) information that 911 call centers receive is not easily usable

So...use the barometer in tandem with GPS? This is shit I can easily track from my personal Homassistant server.

Also, you know how to make GPS more reliable, secure, and redundant? You launch more GPS satellites.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Also, you know how to make GPS more reliable, secure, and redundant? You launch more GPS satellites.

But where will we find room for more Starlink satellites if we do that? Elon said he needs another contract, and when the boss says jump...!

/s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Whatever happened to radio ranging?

That shit was super coolio.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reject modernity, return to sextant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In walks GLONASS I presume

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Google and Apple and others already do that ad hoc, using signal strength from Bluetooth and WiFi beacons. Can contribute to that by just setting up a wireless access point or several near where you want more signal. Doesn't even need to be Internet-connected.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Why not just stop being reliant on cars... you know... put down more rail.... use.. trains...

load more comments
view more: next ›