this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
2109 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

11399 readers
197 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 295 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

If it would destroy the economy if everyone did it, then it should not be doable in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's funny that one probably-landlord downvoted this. You know who you are, scum-sucking leech.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

What? Your comment doesn't make sense. If everyone did any profession solely we would destroy the economy. If everyone became doctors, there would be no engineers or pilots. We would still be doomed. A diversity of vocations are necessary regardless of which vocation.

*Edit. I was thinking maybe you mean investments. But the same holds true there. AND because of hedgefunds and private equity it's becoming more and more of all the money funneling into a handful of companies. All the economists are sounding alarm bells on this. But considering the direction our leaders are taking us, I think this is all part of the plan.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

Landlording is not a profession.

Handyman is a profession. Real estate management is a profession. Landlording is simply siphoning money through the act of owning something.

The economy can tolerate a finite number of leaches before dying. We currently have too many. The ideal number is zero.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Landlording is simply siphoning money through the act of owning something.

This actually applies to most all investments.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

ALL forms of making money from having money need to be abolished completely.

If you're not creating/selling a product or providing a service, you're not EARNING money. Furthermore, rich people getting richer through passive income is the #1 thing diminishing the returns from actually worthwhile endeavors.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 149 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

All so that none of their tenants can afford any of those four things without constantly struggling!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's because they haven't seen that tweet from a money genius who invented the cheat code on life. You just need more money streams for more money. Who knew? Here I was, just sitting with a gazillian dollars stuffed under my mattress nor knowing what to do with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Step one: Have a shitton of money to buy property to rent out.
Oh, you don't have enough money? Hhm, have you tried not being poor?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They act like everyone could do this.

If everyone did this, the system would fail, because the profit here is scooped off the top with no actual production or service.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would also require everyone to own 4+ houses which isn't exactly feasible

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (21 children)

I used to have my own place before my wife and I got married, and she had her own house too. When I moved in with her I decided to rent out my place to a friend, otherwise I'd have to still pay like $650 a month for my mortgage. I set my friends rent at $900 a month for him and a friend, with cats. I paid my mortgage and had some extra to save up in case a repair was needed. Average rent for an apartment (not a house) was 1200-1500 in the same area. My renters ended up taking better care of the house than I ever did. It was beautiful when they lived there. I ended up making about 5k to 10k extra bucks over the course of a few years and my mortgage was paid for me. Eventually they had to move out due to some issues between the two at which point I sold the house and made over six figures(net profit, not gross), off a house that cost less than $80,000 when I bought it.

See what I did there? I charged a reasonable rent and still made a totally stupid amount of money off of just one property. I wasn't a goddamn parasite who tried to bleed my tenants for everything they were worth.

People like these total shitbags. They're the reason why America's youth have no future

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Using my “friends” to pay off a personal debt while making $250/mo in profit off them. See, it’s possible to be a good landlord, everyone!

Did you share any of what you made from the sale with your “friends” who helped you pay for it and kept it in good condition for you?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It seems like it was a situation where everyone felt like they got a good deal and nobody felt taken advantage of. He gave them a better deal than they were going to find anywhere else.

To me, it doesn't sound like he was exploiting his friends.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Did those friends run the risk of having to pay for a new roof or anything else that can go wrong with a house? Tell me you've never owned a house without telling me you've never owned a house

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

You still take someone elses money, just less of it.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (55 children)

Can we not shit all over normal people for doing normal stuff? This dude doesn't run Blackrock, he had a single rental property.

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

See, when the Landlord charges reasonable rates, and actually provides services in exchange for that rent (helping update appliances to newer, having paperwork on hand for any code/inspections needed for property changes (that the landlord would ultimately benefit from,) and in general treating it as a matter of 'I have obligations' instead of 'I will do nothing but I will absolutely blame the tennants for the inevetable crumbling of the property.'

I dislike the concept at base level, but that is a someone who is trying to not be a scumbag.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Landlords don't contribute to society

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Quite the opposite in fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 weeks ago

Groceries and vacations aren't even liabilities. Fella doesn't understand accounting well enough to fake use it properly.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know people like this. They truly believe like they are doing society a favor by buying up houses and renting them out. The disconnect from reality is wild.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's a little better than corporate real estate vultures though. If you think about it, these small landlords and renters are more alike than the people at Blackrock buying up all this shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I remember looking up just the air b&b’s in the Portland metro and there were over 4,000…..

A large majority of the rest were being rented.

The wealthy are buying it all with no regulation.

There should be one home per family in the suburbs. One vacation place and your house. No one needs 10 properties, get rich another way you greedy terrible fucks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's simple to be successful:

  1. have rich parents that can give you money

  2. have easy access to loan programs because you're white and have rich parents

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (17 children)

In the case of the screenshot, absolutely.

I have a question though, and I am curious about the perception here so please be honest as to what you think about my situation. (EDIT: I have received a few responses, and they are terribly informative of all of your perceptions. I want to thank you all for contributing your knowledge to my understanding, as I think by ingesting it, it has made me a better person. Thank you!)

In my case, I own a condo. I worked my ass off doing technical shift work and my parents were fortunate enough in their lives to give me a gift of $20,000 dollars in my local currency to try to buy a home. I am floored. I never thought I would afford the opportunity to potentially own a home of any kind.

I buy a small condo. Two bedrooms. One living room with an attached kitchen. The floors of the building are thin. I can hear my upstairs neighbors walking around and opening and closing doors and drawers at all hours. The insulation is bad, it is cold in winter and hot in summer. I am happy. I have a roof over my head, and I answer to no one for the walls, the fixtures, the plumbing.

I lose my job because the business I worked for fucked up and lost some clients. Because of the lack of cash flow, I and many others are laid off.

I hold on for as long as I can but eventually the cost of mortgage, insurance, groceries add up. I go on unemployment insurance. The economy is fucked because of covid, no one hires me for a year and 6 months.

My unemployment insurance runs out after having submitted 4 resumes daily this entire time, maintaining a log of them for the government EI program.

When I only have a couple thousand dollars left in my bank account, if I want to keep the ownership of my home, I have to move in with my parents again and rent my condo out to keep it at all. My dream of being able to just exist in a home I own is at stake.

The government EI program calls me in for questioning to insure I am a legitimate case. I feel some of the most stress and fear I have ever felt. Logically I know that I have been doing everything I can, but somehow I still feel guilty for having to take advantage of it. I perform the interview, I bring a document detailing the URLs, Descriptions, Dates, everything of every job I have been applying to. The interviewer shows shock on her face. I get the impression that the level of detail I have been maintaining is uncommon. They let me leave without incident.

For rent I charge the exact amount that I have to charge to cover mortgage and insurance, legally required, to maintain my the ownership of my home and nothing more, no profits. I have lived under abusive land lords before and the way they operate disgusts me. I will never be that, I would die before I let myself become that.

A Ukrainian family, Husband and Wife with their 3 year old Daughter are the first to apply. I discuss the property and their lives with them and they are some of the strongest, most responsible, wonderful people I have met in my life who came to my country to escape the situation in theirs. I accept them as my tenants immediately because I recognize how absurdly lucky I am to have these people living in my home, given how smart, how responsible, how kind they are. I promise to myself that at the first opportunity, I will show them the same kindness.

I finally find a job, even though it doesn't pay much, and begin reducing the cost of their rent because I can finally afford it. I begin paying rent to my parents because they are owed that. My bank account begins saving about $100 a month in case I have an emergency I need to cover.

The interest rates lower and condos begin to become cheaper. I intend to lower the cost of the rent based on this when my tenants renew the lease.

This is the last 5 years of my life.

Am I a leech?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Am I a leech?

Technically, I guess so, you're profiting just by owning the property. And having tenants exactly balancing out the costs of owning property.

Morally? Fuck no. What you're doing you are doing to survive, not to live excessively.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is tough, because even though you are charging your tenants the exact amount of your minimum mortgage payment, you are still earning equity in an appreciating asset-- eventually you will be able to turn their rent payments into profits. Now, in my opinion, your level of exploitation is very low, and barely worth considering at all.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

In reality, you would have needed to own these rental properties for decades to have enough cash flow in them to make you enough to live on AND pay for their mortgages, maintenance, insurance, taxes, and property management. Even if you do manage to get a rental property, it will likely initially lose money. These people are likely selling something else, which is the dream of that life. So, they want you to buy their course or something. These people are all the same. "Let me show you how I make X passive income, by selling courses about making passive income."

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. I know people who own rentals and barely make enough to cover the cost of constant repairs. Rental properties are only lucrative if yer a piece of shit landlord. People probably make more money offering courses on how to do it than actually doing it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I had to rant in a couple of comments because I drives me crazy when people defend leeching.

On a more constructive note: Housing cooperatives. I think they should be more widespread. Some people come together to build a house and then live in it for the cost it takes to actually support it. No crazy big apartments with a reasonable amount of people (roughly one bedroom per person), shared luxury such as gardens, in house shops, hell even a pool if you want. There is no leeching, just collective ownership.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Because the only way to escape an exploitative system is to become an exploiter...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

Well this is gross. Its extremely had to buy ONE property, to exist in, if you dont have Bank of Mom and Dad to rely on.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

In a word, corruption.

In two words, legal corruption.

In three words, blatant legal corruption.

In four words, United States political system.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Meh.

  1. This isn't an America problem. People do this in every country

  2. This is capitalism not corruption

For everyone here's a fun thought experience. You have a room with 100 people. In that room is 100$. 1 person (Elon Musk let's say) holds 95$. 4 people (let's say various CEO class people) hold $1 each. The remaining 95 people share the remaining 1$.

And yet here we are all fighting because some of our deluded asses think we are going to be one of those 5 people one day.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

Born on third base. Thinks they hit a triple.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

How does the second tenant pay their mortgage? One apartment's rent should not be enough to cover the mortgage of four (or five - including the one they live in). My guess is that they only payed all the mortgages for these four properties and this is about the mortgage of the apartment they live in.

The cheat code to a stress-free life is to own lots of real estate to being with.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

i've literally paid more in rent for my small apartment than the entire (5 unit) building is worth. i crossed that threshold years ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Any reason why we can't just change the tax code to make this thing less viable? We disincentive things all the time. Like we can carve out exemptions for situations and things I'm sure but like, this shouldn't be how to run a society.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Any reason why we can't just change the tax code to make this thing less viable?

99% of state and federal level politicians are owned by these leeches and/or ARE these leeches.

In other words, almost all of the people with the power to do anything about it have a vested interest in NOT doing anything about it.

this shouldn't be how to run a society.

Ramen.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

I worked in the rental industry for a minuet, and I left because the people in the industry do not think of their renters as people. To property owners, renters are objects that you put in a property to make the property generate money.

load more comments
view more: next ›