A community dedicated to buying Canadian products.
Une communauté dédiée à l'achat de produits Canadiens.
1. Posts must be related to buying Canadian-made goods and / or using Canadian-owned services
2. Absolutely no bigotry will be tolerated. This includes, but is not limited to, racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, etc.
3. AI Content Policy
Not allowed: AI-generated images or articles
Tolerated: AI-generated post summaries
4. When discussing a Canadian product that isn't available nationally, please do your best to specify where it can be purchased
5. Only content in French and English is permitted
6. Declare all self-promotion
Users are encouraged to report any content that violates our community guidelines
1. Les poteaux doivent être en lien avec l'achat de produits et / ou de services opérés par des canadiens
2. Aucune bigoterie ne sera tolérée. Ça comprend, mais sans se limiter à, le racisme, le sexisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie, etc.
3. Politique sur le contenu IA
Non permis : Images ou articles générés par l'IA
Toléré : Résumés IA de publications
4. Lors d'une discussion sur un produit canadien qui n'est pas disponible à l'échelle nationale, veuillez faire de votre mieux pour préciser où il peut être acheté
5. Seul le contenu en français et en anglais n'est toléré
6. Déclarez toute auto-promotion
Les utilisateurs sont encouragés à signaler tout contenu qui ne respecte pas nos directives communautaires
Related communities: Communautés connexes :
!buyeuropean@feddit.uk !buyafrican@baraza.africa !boycottus@lemmy.ca !canada@lemmy.ca !canada@lemmy.ml
This is an update to: List of American owned media pretending to be Canadian, infiltrating Canadian culture and politics.
It is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.
Small FYI, a lot of Americans think Reuters is American, but it's owned by a Canadian billionaire.
I wanted to avoid highlighting for profit media, because of the relative ease of being acquired (as many already have by Americans).
These non profit media outlets will remain so long as they have an audience.
I can delete it if you want.
Why? It's not hurting anyone
Ya know, if it's not in line with your thinking.
Ya know, if it’s not in line with your thinking.
I appreciate the gesture, but you do raise an important point, that Reuters, despite being Canadian, was not included.
I believe in a healthy democracy, we must allow for discussion, even if it is unflattering (unless it's hurting someone), therefore you should do as you please.
If you want to support me in my other ventures, I'm also trying to grow the !fairvote@lemmy.ca community.
Jeez, you, @Sunshine@lemmy.ca, etc. are worse than the stereotypes of vegans or crossfitters. I support election reform and would be very happy with proportional representation, but you guys are too much!
I genuinely believe growing the movement for proportional representation is a critical - perhaps even more important than buying Canadian.
I apologize if it's annoying, but you can also block me if you don't like my content.
And since I did create the content for this post (and I am donating it into the world under CC-BY-NC-SA), shouldn't I be able to promote my other interests?
I appreciate how much the two users you highlighted contribute to lemmy.ca and promote a vision of action and hope, especially in these times
It's fine to disagree but stereotyping and tagging another community member because they made one post about Canadian vegan products is uncivil.
Don't be a dick. Let's not turn Lemmy into a snarky reddit sub.
You may attract more support if your active goals are actually stated where you proclaim they are.
I went to !fairvote and I see: "we did it! We have X number of subscribers!"
But what is your bloody goal?!
Unfortunately, I don't have that level of control to be able to set what you'd be able to see on a particular day.
But what is your bloody goal?!
Sure, that's a fair point, but also it's what the community sidebar was made for.
Great list... but make it more obvious that there's a Canadian list. With such a busy graphic some people, like myself, might initially mistake the graphic at one list instead of 2.
Sorry for posting here but I couldn't comment on the .ca link.
Yes I can see your point, and you're not the first one to mention this. I've updated the infographic.
This is why I had placed the CBC Radio Canada at the top, with the hope that people would stop and think for a moment.
I'll try to make it better, but I'm prioritizing information density and just to be more informative than the other one.
If it really bothers you that much, you can also take the content, and change it yourself, as the infographic is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.
What about the Beaverton?
Came here yo say this :)
APTN is worth including on the right side there eh. It’s a national network.
Edit: OK let me elaborate my case.
APTN News has been added (thanks for making the case, I just didn't have time to look into them)
But that also means that I verified every single media outlets on the infographic!
Also, don't forget about independent local news (if it exists in your area)
If you have further feedback on the content, please add it to this post.
I just drafted up this infographic, because I thought the other one was missing other important media outlets.
A big shout out to CHEK TV out of Victoria, fully employee owned and community oriented. News and some investigative long form segments. Free streaming, can watch livestream and shorts as a guest. Apps available for various platforms. Not totally parochial and sometimes very good.
Who suspected the "London free press" to be Canadian? And why are they American?
There's a good argument here for a law that Canadian media should be owned by Canadians.
There used to be...
Looking at this, it seems to me americans don't care about us french canadians....I can't tell if that's a good thing or not 🤪
I get the majority of my news from CBC. Looks like that's good 👍
I really like that wiggly guy on the APTN logo. They give a good vibe just dancing in front of the sunset :)
Why is Winnipeg Free Press missing?
I wanted to avoid highlighting for profit media, because of the relative ease of being acquired (as many already have by Americans).
These non-profit media outlets will remain so long as they have an audience.
Fair enough, Winnipeg Free Press is a large Canadian media org, but they are indeed for profit and potentially biased that way.
Thanks for being understanding!
Yes, it's the fear of being acquired, and to a lesser extent being a for profit institution means potential conflict of interest.
If it really bothers you that much, you can also take the content, and add it yourself, as the infographic is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0.
Perhaps just an addendum explaining that profit-driven Canadian news outlets are not included here due to the risk of being swayed by American interests.
additionally the next labour government needs to overturn harpers rules that led to the american companies buying up all the media.
Sorry if Im a broken record but I like to remind my Maritimes homies that the Saltwire (or whatever its called now) and the Chronical Herald 🤮 are also American owned.
Added the Chronical Herald!
~~What the fuck are you saying LaPresse and LeDevoir are American owned??? That's not true at all!~~
LaPresse is owned by the non-profit LaPresse Inc. It's completely independant!
And Le Devoir is owned by Le Devoir Inc. A completely 100% Québécois company. They are also 100% independant. (And pro-independance 😉)
Pl~~ease fix that image because it's not factual at all.~~
EDIT: I NEED GLASSES FFS!
I didn't see there were two sides where one was for "Canadian owned". My bad...
It's okay, you're not the first one. I was trying to prioritize information density, and unfortunately this will be an unwanted side effect.
I've made some changes in the meanwhile to lessen the chances of this confusion happening, but I don't think it'll be avoided entirely.
