this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
345 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22634 readers
4283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters. Congratulations!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Do you have any evidence that "protest voters" had any meaningful impact on the elections? Because all evidence I've seen to date indicates the same voter and election fraud that's put the GOP into power for decades is to blame (purging voter rolls, gerrymandering, arbitrary rejection of postal votes, disenfranchisement)

If you don't have evidence, have you ever considered the whole "Liberals blaming progressives for Trump" is part of the multi-decade PsyOps campaign to turn Liberals against the left, and continue shifting the overton window in normalizing fascism and corporate dictatorship?

Maybe you should stop blaming the citizens who drew a line in the sand at genocide, and start blaming the political class that facilitated genocide, and continue to — perhaps rather surprisingly to liberals? — do absolutely nothing as a fascist dictatorship is implemented by their major corporate donors?

Edit. I'm Australian. Thanks for proving my point though! The liberals of L/politics are identical to the liberals of R/politics, blinded by 80 years of corporate propaganda. Enjoy your fascist dictatorship and civil war!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exhibit B. Congratulations!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am an Australian, who has expected American fascism longer than half of you have been alive.

Thanks for proving my point though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're getting downvoted and I'm soon to follow, but everything you said is reasonable and it's almost never wrong to ask for evidence. I continue to be surprised at how tightly this community clings to the narrative that non-voters alone decided the election.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I really think that's part of the psy-ops. Just bots everywhere down voting anything supporting unity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Nope, not a psy op. Very real person here that downvotes this horseshit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't seen any of the obvious "data science fueled" bot activity on Lemmy that I noticed on Reddit well over a decade ago. These communities are barely 1/10000th the size of Reddit right now, and still 1/100th the size of Reddit from a decade ago. Lemmy is simply not large enough to be worth the effort for PsyOps operations.

The point of PsyOps is to run the campaigns on major "marketplaces of ideas" where they reach as many eyeballs as possible, and then the victims will repeat those narratoves elsewhere. The Cambridge Analytica CEO described it candidly in one of these. Threads on Lemmy are really just examples of the victims disseminating and perpetuating the propaganda. 99% of these comments are real people who genuinely believe the dumb shit they type.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's entirely possible. I haven't seen any evidence that protest votes had any significant effect on the outcome. Mostly, people seem to have been less motivated in general, as well as widespread voter suppression purging voters from all states. But anyone who is screaming at protest voters for having morals that they refuse to compromise on is not only stupid, but has lost sight of what is virtuous. Empathy is a good thing, and having enough that you cannot support those who support genocide is admirable. Choosing the lesser of 2 evils is also admirable for different reasons. Society needs both. Frothing at the mouth about people not voting for a bad candidate is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Corporate propaganda?

You might be surprised to learn there was more than one group at fault for this.

The "I don't like Biden" group should have known better. At least the magats have the excuse of being fully indoctrinated into a cult.

That's why the smaller group is called out. Because they knew better.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

1st, gerrymandering has nothing to do with the presidential election. It was obvious from your post you know very little about US elections.

Next, there were 8.2 million fewer votes in 2024 than 2020. All of that loss was on the democratic side. Do you have evidence literally millions of voters were disenfranchised?

Had those missing voters participated in good faith in 2024, Trump would not be president today.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

So gerrymandering — which has facilitated the stealing of state elections and influenced state laws for decades, including around the handling of elections, purging of legitimate voters, disenfranchisement, etc — has no effect on federal elections whatsoever?

Please continue to libsplain me on my knowledge of US politics... I'm sure you're able to see the big picture and long term trends; not simply as confidently ignorant as 99% of D's I've dealt with on social media for the last 2 decades. Keep up the stellar work, champ!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

To us non-Americans this is a really bad look. Did you really do everything you could to prevent this? Anyway, we’re all here and we all have to deal with it now. And really, you / we didn’t start this. The wheels were already set in motion before most of our time. Fascism is the inevitable outcome of capitalism. But we must be the ones to take action and set things right and build a better world.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can't admit you were wrong then or now. Sigh. But keep blaming them. Go on. Do it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

We are doing it, what did you miss on the previous post?

You and your "but genocide" argument got us here. Yeah, Harris is super flawed and I wouldn't vote her to save my life, BUT THE ALTERNATIVE WAS WHAT WE ARE LIVING NOW. What part of "I will be a dictator" made you think "well that sounds like a good alternative!" ??

And in case it need saying: Yes, genocide is bad, doh! We all know that but it was between someone who wouldn't explicitly criticize Israel for it's actions and the one that said "I will eradicate Palestine" and for some reason you either voted for the latter or didn't vote at all because reasons?

Most of the accounts I had these arguments with before the election magically disappeared from the Internet so it's safe to assume that those were Russian paid shills bit apparently there are enough of you types left who really do practice professional mental gymnastics

If you really really really had wanted that genocide stopped you had voted Harris and then right after her inauguration, you'd paralyze the country in protests until she will.

But noooooo, you preferred this, whatever the hell this is supposed to be.

I hope you enjoyed your last election ever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you trying to accomplish?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

To congratulate the non-protest-voters on their vote for this!

[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

One of my close friends got her doctorate last year and recently hired as a scientist at EPA. She is improving methods of surveying urban soils using remote methods like ground penetrating radar, this helps to inform landowners/potential developers the true conditions of the soil they are building on. A shame the government doesn’t think that’s important anymore.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Sounds like woke DEI garbage. Everyone knows plants need Brawndo, the Thirst Mutilator. It’s got what plants crave.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's got electrolytes...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The government is being run by the sorts of people who are doing the illegal dumping of hazardous waste that your EPA friend is trying to detect. Of course they don't want her to do it; they don't want to be held accountable!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

She is improving methods of surveying urban soils

Correction, she was.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

She hasn’t been layed off yet but, yea, only a matter of time…

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

A shame the government doesn’t think that’s important anymore.

Not just unimportant, sand in the gears of their capitalist steamroller. The true conditions of anything must not interfere with the advertised conditions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

and also the funding on research in general is going out the window, making people trying to enter stem industries all that unlikely. when its already very hard to enter stems as it is.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago

And the shareholders applauded like there was no tomorrow, and they were right.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

They need to change their name to Environment Destruction Agency.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I assume everything they will roll back is preventing companies from making more money.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Yeah, we know this chemical causes hypercancer but if we can put it in our food, it'll save 13¢/ton. Can ya give me a quick ol authorization there, guy?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Only select companies, and only In the short term. In the medium to long term it won't help them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

What do the letters stand for then?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

Extraction of Profits Agency

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Environmental Putrification Agency

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Enshitification Policy Agency

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Enterprise Protection Agency

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I want to know if these people truly don't believe in climate change or they know it's so bad already that nothing can reverse it... and just don't care.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

They think/know they’ll be rich enough to avoid the negative problems climate change will present, or they’ll be dead before it happens. They’re writing checks that the rest us will have to cash and laughing at us as we cheer for them to do so.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think you are overthinking it. They don't even have climate change in their considerations, they are solely focused on the short term profits corporations can make from dismantling government regulations. That is how corporate cleptocracy works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Most don't think it's real. (As far as I can tell.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Incase anyone out of the know about the head of EPA: Trump Ally, Ass-Kisser, Defending the shithead during the first impeachment hearing and sworn in after being selected by Trump. There you go.

Now you can not be surprised anymore.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He also went to the same highschool as I did. Of 900 kids in my graduating class 450 actually graduated...

Nothing good comes from that school, myself included lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Geez I hope somebody doesn’t whip out some amendment or other and explain things to this man in a way he’ll be sure to comprehend.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Should rename it to EDA( Environmental Destruction Agency).

Or Environmental Freedom Force for short.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I love the taste of dioxin in my tap water!

load more comments
view more: next ›