this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
112 points (100.0% liked)

News

27865 readers
6690 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under growing pressure from their left flank, several Democratic centrists said Wednesday evening and Thursday that they would vote against the House GOP spending proposal, even though they had earlier warned that the failure to pass it could trigger a devastating government shutdown.

Sens. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.), two centrists up for re-election in 2026, announced they would vote to block the House bill, as did Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who as recently as Monday warned that blocking the bill and possibly triggering a shutdown would be a “huge risk.”

Ossoff, who is considered the most vulnerable Senate Democratic incumbent, announced late Thursday evening — after Schumer’s announcement — that he would oppose the House bill.

He said the bill “guts NIH research into diseases like Alzheimer’s and maternal mortality, funding for the prevention of violence against women, and Army Corps of Engineers construction of water infrastructure.”

Slotkin, who won election to the Senate last year in a state that Trump carried, also announced late Thursday evening that she would vote against the House bill.

“I will be voting no on the continuing resolution tomorrow. First, because this bill is bad for Michigan. It makes significant cuts to Michigan’s key infrastructure projects,” she said. “But on top of that, my Republican colleagues offered no assurances that the money wouldn’t be redirected at the whip of Elon Musk,” she said.

One Democratic senator familiar with the tense internal debate over strategy said the strong arguments of liberal senators and the growing pressure from the base had moved votes in the caucus.

“Some of them may be changing their viewpoint here,” the senator said of colleagues’ shifting stances on the House bill. “We’ve had that robust debate.”

[Bolding added]

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250314121420/https://www.npr.org/2025/03/13/nx-s1-5327600/house-democrats-outrage-spending

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this is the hill Schumer dies on, we're screwed. The Democrat party, when actually needed, really only exists for the illusion of choice.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Democrats have been controlled opposition since at least the 70s.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Democratic party has been incredibly ineffective and far too indulgent of free market ideological nonsense for a very long time, but I don't see any realistic way of preventing Republicans from winning elections that doesn't involve Democratic candidates in most circumstances

Also, for whatever it's worth, I think at this point a majority of Democratic lawmakers have come out against what Schumer is asking for here. They need to follow through on their convictions and remove him from their leadership, but either way there is real disagreement within the Democratic party over this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago
  • Ranked choice voting
  • count ballots like the other democracies
  • profit

All of this, and I literally mean the entire drama over the last decades, would have been avoided.

But it’s very hard to do this in the USA; and may never happen enough to matter. But these two issues are much more important than most other things talked about

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure treason carries a death penalty.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Schumer is a fucking cuck