this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

3676 readers
759 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Other questions include whether science organisation receives funding from China and whether it is a climate or ‘environmental justice’ project

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250325042257/https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/mar/25/csiro-australia-science-agency-questioned-trump-administration-us-government-interests


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

Confidence that America told allies that they could brick military equipment if they don’t comply: near 100%

Losers. Morons. Bullies.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Man, it's insane that you let a hostile, overtly evil foreign power openly operate a spy network in your nation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

australia doesn’t really have a lot of choices: we have a population the size of texas in an area almost the size of the whole US… there’s just no hope of protecting that without help

our only bargaining chips are: space, location, and the huge amount of natural resources

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

America would probably launch a land invasion of Australia before they ever let Pine Gap go. Previous attempts were met with harsh penalties from the US.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Tell them to fuck off, the funding we will source elsewhere. Will be painful but I would prefer short term pain then Australia being bullied into unwanted ideologies.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

A problem with scientism is that it worships "scientists" regardless of their actual output. There is nothing inherently good about having a job as a "scientist" especially under capitalism. Many of these people are at best mindless drones serving hegemony, and at worst overt fascists.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

From your linked article:

"While the term was defined originally to mean "methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to natural scientists", some scholars, as well as political and religious leaders, have also adopted it as a pejorative term with the meaning "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation"

That "worshipping " wording is, by your own sources, a political act.

Pulling a definition out of your arse and then judging a whole group of people based on your made up beliefs... You're not an anarchist, you're a trumpist in decline, pitching people against each others instead of standing up for others.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Look at their username. Couple that with their commentary and it's one to steer clear of.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Just say you celebrate illiteracy

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Man, i was gonna watch the V miniseries again tonight but this comment is making it too on the nose.