this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
785 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

1359 readers
538 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to [email protected]

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 months ago (4 children)

No single thing alone will fix the world. Voting alone won't fix it. Throwing a molotov alone won't fix it.

Voting (in many places, for many people) takes almost no effort. Go do it. But don't call it a day and think you've done everything you can do. Refusing to vote just yields one of the many fronts in this conflict without a fight.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Voting (in many places, for many people) takes almost no effort

The voting apparatus takes immense effort in fact. It takes so much effort that it's almost all consuming for most nations during the election period and wastes thousands of human-workhours.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I meant the amount of effort it takes for the end user.

If we're going to talk about higher order levels of effort, then everything gets very expensive very quickly.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (5 children)

No, The point is that all that "higher order level" of effort is wasted on electoralism. It's not wasted in direct action.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I follow. I was talking about what individuals should do: direct action and also voting. Voting is often just a few minutes for the end user.

I'm not talking about what the state should spend resources on.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Voting is largely volunteer run. All that effort is wasted. Taking part in elections legitimizes that effort

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Most people follow election results and those people's actions have real, discernable, effects. If you yield on this front, even if you think elections are flawed, you're letting your opponents have this power uncontested. That's a terrible strategy.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

You think the 90M people that couldn’t be bothered to vote against fascism are going to take to the streets and fight?

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Electoral voting is useless and built to disenfranchise and demotivate people participating from politics. Doing direct action immediately improves your life and builds mutual aid networks. So yes.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s useless, yet it’s exactly why we have a fascist dictator? That’s tautological.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You would get a fascist dictator regardless. That has always been the inevitable path of liberal electoral politics under capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Ah, defeatism. It’s going to happen anyway, so why bother doing anything about it. Great outlook.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Don't put words in my mouth. I suggest the opposite of "doing nothing". Voting is doing nothing every 4 years and expecting things to improve in the face of 100 years of evidence to the contrary.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I insist that you’re incorrect, based on the simple fact that 77M people voted for a fascist dictator and now we have a fascist dictator. Clearly voting does something, or we wouldn’t have a fascist dictator for president.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Kinda ignores the reality that the past 3 election cycles have been fascist vs. a party that positions itself as progressive "not fascists." You'd think that, you know. The "not fascists" would've done something to prevent the fascists from gaining power.

Instead, they endorsed international colonialism and genocide and spent 4 years fighting back against workers' rights.

Electoral liberalism trends towards the right over time. As a rule. Because capitalist interests are always further to the right, and electoral liberalism is based on capitalism and the existence of a capitalist ruling class. Any ideology that permits the existence of capitalism must include very strong limits on capitalist enterprise and absolute bans on capital political power and influence. Or, by default, it becomes more fascist over time. Anti-capitalism is the only ideology congruent with antifascism.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Yes, electoral politics inevitably and eventually "does" fascism.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They aren't saying do nothing, they're saying do something more useful than voting.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And I’m saying not voting is how we got fascism. There were 13M more people that did nothing, than all 77M people who voted for Trump. I don’t expect them to fight unless personally attacked.

That leaves the ~78M people that collectively voted against Trump. Then remove the sick, disabled, elderly, government, military, and police. We’re not getting anywhere with force unless we can engage the 90M people who couldn’t be inconvenienced to put pen to paper to stop fascism.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Oh, are you under the impression that there's a group of liberals (as in liberalism in general) out there that doesn't coddle and appease and enable fascism that I could vote for? Because Democrats are putting up the most token of resistance at best, and meanwhile voting in support of the right's shenanigans in congress. Schumer voted for the budget, 4 others voted just the other day for a bill that would effectively disenfranchise millions of women, etc.

If you walk into a voting booth and find someone holding a bomb who insists that your only choice for how to deal with it is to choose between a long fuse or a short one, the only sane thing to do is to say 'Good luck with that' and leave before you get caught in the blast radius. I voted blue for 30 years and it didn't get me less fascism, why do you imagine it would suddenly start working today? The fascism is coming from inside the house.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m saying that Harris was not a fascist dictator. Simple as.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No, she probably wouldn't have been. But hey, if you're comfortable cuddling up with that bomb because it has a longer fuse then by all means don't let me stop you, just don't act all surprised when it inevitably blows up anyway.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

So you’re an accelerationist. Gotcha. The problem with accelerating into fascism is that not enough people have been made aware of their oppression along the way. This is far more likely to result in a lasting dictatorship than the revolution from a longer fuse.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They stated a fact, that not defeatism. WTF is with people getting mad at the messenger all the time

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The message that voting would’ve done nothing to stop Trump from being elected is nonsensical.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

It doesn't take 90M people to blow up a pipeline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Everyone agitating for an overthrow of the system through memes is going to get out there and start doing it any day now just you wait...

Aaaaaaaany day now...

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

True. What works best is being a smug "nothing ever happens" lib online and doing one political action every 4 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm very disappointed with Biden's administration for not charging more people in Trump's first term for the crimes they committed. They didn't face any consequences the last time and will now be completely off the rails. Now we have a second Trump administration with most of the same people that now know they can get away with anything.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago

The problem is that US democracy consists of voting for either a conservative party (Democrats) or a fascist party (Republicans).

When the conservatives are in power they care most about preserving the appearance of legitimacy of institutions and they don't do anything like arresting politicians or stuffing the supreme court even though it would strengthen democracy.

Then the fascists get in and destroy everything anyway.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I see the psyop is hard at work already. "No, don't vote, it's useless, don't even bother, leave it to those suckers who are doing this stupid ineffective voting thing. Oh, they have all the power all of the sudden? Who knew, no idea how that happened"

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Don't badjacket. Just because we don't believe in the electoral farce doesn't make us a paid actor.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's true, some people repeat the same points for free. This is also bad, it leads to bad outcomes.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (16 children)

100+ years of electoralism and you ended up in fascism anyway. Talk about bad outcomes.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apathy is what got us here

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Avarice and individualism got here.

To the point many still consider both to be strengths and not the weaknesses they are.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You are not getting out of this by voting ALONE,

#but you still must also vote, at EVERY CHANCE

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Soap box

Ballot box

Ammo box

If they deny the midterms, overturn the results or refuse to acknowledge their loss, that is the natural next step. People still believe in the power of popular sovereignty

load more comments
view more: next ›