this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
293 points (100.0% liked)

Electric Vehicles

1408 readers
72 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 95 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Remove fuel taxes. Apply taxes to tires. Done and done.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You'd incentive people to make tires that lasted longer and that would be horrible.

But also

House republicans have proposed putting a $200/year federal registration tax on EVs

I do love it when Republicans ride into office on a wave of people screaming "ARGH! I HATE TAXES!" and then spend the first four months in office finding an exciting new way to raise people's taxes.

More than anything, I'm looking forward to all those Cybertruck owners getting the "Fell For It Again" award branded onto their foreheads.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Adjust taxes based on tread wear rating.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or just tax by miles driven and vehicle curb weight instead of doing stupid proxy workarounds.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There's a whole lot more administrative overhead that would need to go into collecting miles driven data after it's been driven, and such a system would be far easier to cheat.

Tax on tires based on treadwear and load ratings would be dead simple to implement.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

So I'll swap some newer tires on there timed with this. Or keep a set of barely used ones. Grab some cheap ones from a car yard. They'd need a lot of strict rules around this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If you do it based on company estimates for wear at the time the car is sold, hello expensive tires! You are collecting 30k miles worth of taxes at once. The tax would be even higher on long wear tires! On top of that different states have wildly different amounts of tax they add to gas which will incentivize buying tires from out of state. I assume similar differences exist in the EU as a comparison. This tax would also be part of buying a car, since they come with tires.

If a tire gets ruined, you already paid the tax and get to pay it again to continue driving. Hello potholes and construction nails!

If you try to spread it out based on wear over time, that would be far harder to calculate than just checking the odometer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay, the expensive tires thing is a problem. I did a little math.

Let's say you get 50K miles out of a set of tires. At 25MPG, with an existing fuel tax of $0.50/gal, switching that to a tax on tires would amount to $250 per tire for a set of four to equal out. You'd ultimately be paying the same amount, but attaching it to the tire would make that all come up front. And then, yeah, you'd have people driving out of state for tires (if neighboring states didn't do the same thing), as well as driving in to the state for the cheap gas.

Bah.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Let's say you get 50K miles out of a set of tires.

Note that most EVs get nowhere near that. The faster acceleration, higher torque, and heavier weight chew through tires.

So a flat tax on tires would results in EV owners paying more even though they don't damage the road significantly more than petrol vehicles.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Treadwear isn't a scientific measurement though.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Eh...people already drive on tires well after they're too bald to be safe anymore. Taxing tires is just a great way to make sure that people replace them even less often.

Maybe increase vehicle registration fees? Charge connection fees to connect your driveway to a public street? Charge businesses per-space parking lot taxes? I dunno. This seems like a tricky problem to solve.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait what? Aren’t CO2 emissions caused by burning fossil fuels? Why wouldn’t you want to tax those?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

This isn't about CO2. I think the idea is that a lot of our funding for roads is based around the taxes for gasoline and diesel. Since EVe don't use either, they are damaging the roads at the same (or more due to their weight) but not providing the tax revenue for the maintenance work needed.

Moving to tires would apply the taxation to both vehicles types. I think it's a bit short sighted and tires are used for more than road vehicles; but at the same time so is gasoline (like yard equipment.)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why not apply to mileage instead? More miles on the roads means you use the infrastructure more

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tire wear is proportional to vehicle mileage and weight. A tire tax would effectively do the same thing while being easier to implement.

Incentivizes not replacing tires which is bad for safety and all.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

It is until tire manufacturers get an incentive to sell decreased wear tires, likely at the expense of other features. Along with people putting off tire replacement even longer, this would just be asking for a significant decrease in road safety.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it easier to implement? Maybe, but not really.

An alternative and would just be an annual inspection. Some states already require this, many just emissions. Just have it as a blanket annual safety inspection requirement for all vehicles, including emissions for the necessary vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know why you’re being down voted, but yes the mileage every year is recorded and taxed. In my state if you drive less than 10000 miles a year you get a discount on your inspection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

It's because some people despise the idea of inspections.

Because ensuring the basic safety of a 2-3 ton hunk of metal flying down the road at speeds up to 80mph is apparently government overreach. Or because it's an inconvenience to have to take it in once a year. Or whatever other bullshit reason they try to justify in their heads that basic safety inspections are a waste of time and resources. You know, shitty people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In Oklahoma they used to tax vehicles according to sale value. A lightweight, fiberglass Corvette could be an easy $600 a year while my friend's 2-ton dump truck had antique plates at $20 a year. Guess which one tore up the roads.

I think they changed that system long ago, and at the time Texas taxed according to vehicle weight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Antique and Classic plates usually have pretty restrictive use policies associated with them. Assuming you don't ignore them and risk a ticket every time you drive outside those uses.

For Oklahoma for instance:

Affiant further states that the vehicle described above will travel highways of this state primarily incidental to historical or exhibition purposes only.

From the application form: https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/service-oklahoma/Documents/mv-forms/license-plate/763%20Classic%20Vehicle%20Plate.pdf

Given the antique registered vehicle is supposed to only be used on public roads in very limited scenarios, the small cost is appropriate, regardless of the specific vehicle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

"Primarily" does a lot of heavy lifting there. Basically, it doesn't outlaw using it in other manners so it wouldn't be easily enforceable by a traffic cop. It would only really be brought forward as fraud if a prosecutor could prove you used it "primarily" for other reasons.

And thats beyond saying that driving it, on its own, is not an exhibition purpose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Tires have limited mileage, so effectively the same result and you dont the gov invading your privacy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The privacy of what? An odometer reading?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Tires are also a consumable that, if used to the point of failure, become a hazard to the driver and anything around them. Adding the tax to the tires would encourage those with lesser means to use them to the point of being dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So add vehicle inspections to the list. And taxes can be prorated if the tire failed before being fully consumed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

So add vehicle inspections to the list. And taxes can be prorated if the tire failed before being fully consumed.

L. O. L.

So rather than just take the mileage of the vehicle at registration/renewal, we'll add more red tape to the process and make everything cost more so we can use a silly proxy to get the amount of use of the vehicle.

That's the American way I'm used to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are several states already that require safety inspections.

Hell emissions tests are required for ICE vehicles in nearly every state, and guess what they do when those roll through for emissions testing? They record the mileage.

There's no additional red tape here, it's the same red tape that was there before it was an EV that didn't need emissions testing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I wish they took my mileage into account for my emissions testing. If it's under 500 miles between the two year emissions testing period, I'd appreciate them being more lenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

They've tried mandating vehicle inspections in my state several times. It never goes very far.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Driving is a privilege. Odometers aren't personal secrets.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

That's how you end up with people driving on racing slicks and wire...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago (5 children)

imho, the 'loss' of fuel tax is made up by having no tailpipe emissions fucking up the air.

until ev makes up more than half of the vehicles on the road and ice is legislatively deprecated with a sales cut-off set in stone, i think ev owners should get the benefit of no tax on its 'power source' as one of the incentives to switch to and keep using them over petrol-powered vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Aww! Losing fuel taxes? Bummer. Maybe they should ask deep-red Alabama how they do without taxing fuel.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Nah, EVs put wear and tear on the road too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I'm curious how often you complain about the state of the roads you drive on. Girl taxes have already not kept up with the costs of maintaining the roads. Now there's a significant percentage not even paying them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago

Let me guess, they want this but with a caveat of not including teslas in the tax increase.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

they really do want to see the world burn, literally, not figuratively. They won't be happy until we're all dying from extreme heat.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

We should ask why. Did they fuck up the economy and need new revenue?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Let me laugh for a solid minute here. I friggin' love these guys. They're going to make the entire country Detroit because they're such snowflakes that can't take competition. Hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

You wish, I'd rather be in Detroit then anywhere in the south.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Some motherfuckers never got punched in the throat mouth enough when they were kids trying to be bullies

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In Ohio we already pay $200 additional for registering an EV compared to ICE. 🤦‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

NJ has something like that as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Welp it’s going to be 400 now because the rich aren’t rich enough.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I doubt the real president will like that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

It's already been reved to $250

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Take them tarrifs to 10000000x MAGAts.

load more comments
view more: next ›