this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
729 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

5412 readers
477 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://50501.chat/post/177705


Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-05-02 10:43:07 AM | Source


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 232 points 3 days ago (6 children)

We don't need AI rubbish for this, someone already made this one:

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

They made them centuries ago

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Fighting the war class? No, I would better derive all my strength into a useless fight against a technology (which was also made and used by workers, artist are not the only workers in this world). Fighting my own comrades if necessary to accomplish the Butlerian Yihad.

That's how the left space feels nowadays. We better rebrand socialism to antiAIsm because there's not much else left on the movement these days.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I mean, why does it have to be one thing we are trying to not support? People in leftist spaces are trying to root out AI because of its myriad global problems and the way that the industry is akin to a new type of destructive bomb in the class war. Consolidating more wealth and power into the hands of the same technocrat few, poisoning the earth, destroying the livelihood of artists (and entire companies and divisions of workers across multiple industries because bosses are seeing dollar signs), stealing from the many and giving to the few in terms of creativity, it’s set to benefit the VCs…what is there to like about it?

You’re seeing a lot of talk about it because so many people thoughtlessly bought in when the more moral action would be to abstain from using it and insist on spaces that don’t welcome it. It’s not really that we are shifting energy away from more important things. It’s just that people will always say “hey, can we not use this here?” And you’re acting like we’re letting starving orphans starve so we can fight AI.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

There’s nothing immoral about AI, and it doesn’t steal from anything. Ideas can’t be owned, and copyright and intellectual property are capitalist nonsense. If you don’t want to share an idea, don’t bring it into the world. Because once you do, it collectively belongs to the human condition.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is a discussion for governance. It does nobody any good to allow anti ai warriors to start brigading every post containing so called "ai slop". It's just a new pointless diversion for keyboard warriors to fight over, accomplishing nothing in the process but derailing any meaningful discussion on the content of the OP. There are other ways to fight back against corporate power, such as making access to genAI technology free and open source, like db0s ai horde project.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Oops, I guess I was a little too spicy. I agree, we don’t need AI, and using the tools of billionaires instead of real art by human artists is at best misguided and at worst actively harming the people you purportedly want to help.

I don’t blame people for reposting it when they don’t realize it’s AI, it can be hard to tell.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (29 children)

We're friendly to AI art on this instance. If you don't like that, the door is over there.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can be friendly to it, but that doesn't mean you need to like everything. People are friendly to traditional art, doesn't mean they have to like every single piece of traditional art. People can be into food, but they don't need to like every single cuisine.

Surely you wouldn't take the position every single thing on here needs to be GenAI? So in the middle is where we find ourselves.

So be discerning, you owe yourself that at least.

Back to the topic:

This piece is just a bit rubbish and kinda unmemorable. The one I linked did a better job of conveying the same message in a more memorable way IMO, and it seems that opinion is shared by other users of your instance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There's s small handful of folks who dogmatically hate-post about anything genAI. But the vast majority couldn't care less. This is in fact a relatively popular post for this community at 106 downvotes and 519 upvotes, and that's including all the anti-genAI downvote bots, and all the neoliberals. So remind me why ~1/6 of users should dictate to everyone else what the community allows?

And tbh we are never gonna become anti anti-genAI instance. Fuck copyrights and the horse they rode in on (capitalism). You anti-genAI trolls are becoming annoying enough we might need to add a rule about it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

we might need to add a rule about it.

You should, if you're going to remove comments you don't like and break no rules.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Given my comment got half the upvotes of the post, I could make the argument that half of the people in here agree with me saying it was a bit rubbish.

Like be honest, do you genuinely think the original post is actually more memorable and effective* at conveying the message than the Murdoch one? If you do, that's fine I guess, art is subjective, but you don't get to insist everyone else has to love it.

*This is a lefty memes community remember, that's the important thing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Given my comment got half the upvotes of the post, I could make the argument that half of the people in here agree with me saying it was a bit rubbish.

Not how math works i'm afraid. At most that would be 25%, and a bunch of them probably just like the other meme.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

so you're saying you're friendly towards some AI art, right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah if it's actually got artistic merit or is actually interesting in some way sure, life isn't black & white, so I won't be either. Cards on the table, I've got some issues with how some of the big models have been trained and deployed, but no real issue with the technology itself.

The AI art will be at most as good as the effort going into it, and honestly it's pretty clear that 90% of the stuff you see posted around at the moment barely had 30 mins spent on the idea.

I can guarantee I'm not gonna like much of any traditional art where it's clearly low effort and derivative either. The best art does something new and interesting

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's a memes community not fine art ffs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

50501 is not an org to be trusted. It’s an arm of the establishment trying to brand itself as an activist group, and there’s tons of problematic reports coming out from their behavior already.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Love that reddit watermark.

Be best OP

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Eh that's all on the mirror comm it's cross posted from

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

there's one African immigrant that should be blamed.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago

No war but class war. All struggle is class struggle. Everything else is FUD and obfuscation.

load more comments
view more: next ›