this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
705 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

69702 readers
2711 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

X Social Media is suing X, a social media company::Elon Musk’s X is being sued by a Florida company called X Social Media for alleged unfair competition and trademark violations that it says have resulted in lost revenue.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 219 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I like the fact that the article had to refer to the non-Musk site as XSM instead of its full name of 'X Social Media' because it would just make the article too confusing to use the proper name.

That perfectly illustrates the point.

I suppose it also means that if XSM lose the case because X is too generic, anyone can then set up a rival social media company also called X.

They can probably use the same logo too as it's just Unicode.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I'm just amazed that it turns out there's actually 2 people who think this is a good name for a social media website.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There is a good chance that there are A-W, Y and Z social media companies too. Some may be legit (eg. marketing on existing social media platforms), and others more for trademark squatting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

There aren't. The first company is an ad agency that specializes in social media.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

So is apple. Just because it's generic doesn't mean it's not protected by trademark law. Trademarks are also first come first serve, exclusive to a given industry (so you could call your company Apple or X, but it better be not in a business where it's already trademarked). They're also use it or lose it, and you basically have to sue others using it if you want to keep it.

Obviously the logo isn't just the character X, it's a character X in particular font. If they used the same one they would be violating their trademark.

[–] [email protected] 205 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I really want X.org to get some massive compensation for Elon's theft of their logo.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 years ago

Took this in London the other day.

It's too common a symbol for X.org to have much of a shot because they're not competitors. This "X Social Media" might have a stronger claim if they've actually used and defended a trademark specifically in the social space.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And give all the money to Wayland.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except their logo wasn't stolen.

X is using a standard Unicode symbol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

𝕏 (U+1D54F) and/or 𝕩 (U+1D569)

If you search blackboard bold or double-struck letters you can find more.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

So basically musk is so cheap (and toxic) he can't even convince any graphic designers to work for him.

Lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Its probably still too different for that, but I am not against them trying of course.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Apple has successfully trademarked everything that remotely looks like an apple with a bite taken out - there's a good chance it'll work

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like how they make a deal with Apple Records in the 80s that allowed both companies to use similar logos so long as Apple Computers didn't sell music and Apple Records didn't sell computers.

Then when iTunes became Apple's #1 product in the 2000s Apple successfully defended itself in court claiming that digital downloads were just 1s and 0s, so Apple Computers never sold music.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What is worse than an apple with a bite taken out and a worm in it?

An apple with a bite taken out and half a worm in it!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

That joke contained an apple with a bite taken out of it, you can expect to hear from Apple's lawyers soon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

A worm with half an apple taken out of it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

X.XXX

Whatever happened to all the buzz about the internet finally giving porn sites their own top-level domain.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That lawsuit simply says : "acquire me, acquire me, O Holy Musk, acquire me..."

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago

Which is good in my opinion.

Ol' Musky just went "I want Twitter to be named X" and hoped reality would shape to his thoughts.

And now, some random person who made a shitty shell company for a few hundred bucks gets to get a couple mil because baby Elong Muskrat didn't bother to do his homework.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

I'm glad I'm not the only one seeing this as someone praying for a check.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It was bound to happen eventually: a company has filed a lawsuit in federal court against Elon Musk’s X Corp. over its renaming of Twitter (via Reuters).

The company in question is X Social Media LLC, an ad agency from Florida that alleges X Corp. is guilty of violating Florida common law because of “unfair competition and trademark and service mark infringement,” as well as the state’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

X Social Media (hereafter referred to as XSM to make this article easier to write) writes in the complaint that it has used its registered trademark, “X SOCIALMEDIA,” continuously since 2016.

XSM claims it has “already suffered loss in revenue that correlates with X Corp.’s rebrand and use of the mark ‘X.’”

It’s unclear how strong X Social Media’s case will ultimately be.

Law professor Alexandra Roberts told The Verge earlier this year that the “crowded field” of “X” trademarks could make it hard for any individual X-branded service to enforce a claim against another — whether that’s Musk’s X or a company like X Social Media.


The original article contains 177 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved -1%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bot dropping the ball big time.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You have to applaud the fact the bot did correctly report a negative savings and did not show us whatever the bot equivalent is of a seg fault.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well at least it didn't save us -10^100% and just post the text equivalent of a ZIP bomb

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

New bot idea

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago

fwiw, the bot mangled some text around The Verge with some nbsp and that's what makes up the -1%, the text is otherwise identical

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jesus, Bot. You're a damned failure.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago

Bot is awesome. It has saved me from many cookie popups and ads.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

What the bot added more words than it removed? BAD BOT, BAD!

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago

Sorry who is suing who now?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

Downvote Musk spam.

The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring him and his businesses stay in the headlines every day. Don’t be a useful idiot.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

Technically they are not exactly on the same field which could allow using similar trademarks. But on the other hand in this case X's use of X could be reasonably argued to be very confusing for customers and therefore violating X's trademark.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

What do you mean this isn't a real show? Am I getting paid real money?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

If we are lucky, it'll end with Musk's bankruptcy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

We may genuinely never hear the end of it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

ex-X formerly Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The article says it is "an ad agency".

Makes me curious: why are they calling themselves "Social Media"?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd wager their focus is advertising ON social media.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Hmmmm... seems they don't want to work on X-twitter anymore :-)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Probably because Social Media is their ad platform.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

X used to be an ad agency before Musk scared off all their advertisers and turned it into a subscription bullshit delivery service

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Because they advertise on social media.

load more comments
view more: next ›