this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1008 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

5446 readers
1206 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

See, moderate Democrats are just right wing. Republicans are closer to fascist. Your whole political spectrum has been wandering to the right for quite a while now. "Radical left" Democrats would be centrist anywhere else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

That, and the democrats are at least competent when it comes to implementing neoliberalism...

I would prefer a government that is further left. I think it would be more moral and create better outcomes for the people, but until we have a chance for that I'll take competence...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

Ratchet theory: Republicans push things to the right, Democrats prevent movement to the left.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

This is what I've been saying about US politics for a long time. They've got two parties - the far right, and the batshit crazy right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Nha man the US has politic spectrum, it has only right or left, democrate or replublic. People are either for Trump or against Trump. /s

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In France we have a saying "Si t'es pas de gauche, t'es de droite" i.e "if you're not a leftist, then you're on the right wing" meaning that if you do not explicitly reject the paradigm supported by the right then you're implicitly accepting it and thus indirectly support right wing and conservatism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Seems a bit suspect and authoritarian..

Does it work in reverse? If not, why not?

My first thought was, that’s just GWB’s “if you are not with us you are against us”, with different words.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I see what you mean and when I first heard that saying I thought so too. That's why I developed a bit after. In my opinion it does not mean "if you're not with us you're against us in an irreversible manner" at all (I don't fight against individuals, I fight against a toxic ideology). To me, it mostly aims to denounce the fact that centrists are actually right wing people who don't admit it. And, at least in France, the situation tends to confirm that : Macron was officially "neither on the left nor on the right" and it has become clearer and clearer that he is, in fact, completely on the right end of the political spectrum (if not worse for some of our ministers like Retailleau who clearly carries a far right ideology).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

In the Netherlands we are lucky that we have actually have a spectrum you can choose from. I am not that versed in the France political system, but I don't believe in that you are either left or you are right.

I think most people can agree with statements from both the left and the right. At least if they get room to express that.

If you look at left and right political in the Netherlands than there is also an issue. The left generally wants higher taxes for the rich and more income for the poor. The right generally want lower taxes for businesses and want to pay the poor less money to compensate that or something like that. Neither side will focus on the middle class, but currently in The Netherlands it's the middle class who pay the most taxes percentage wise. (The loss of govern ant benefits, increases the percentage you are taxed in this calculation).

I do believe that there are a lot of good politicians who can parade as somebody else while campaigning and then doing other things after they are chosen. That's why you generally want more than one person to make decisions. However having 225 people who decide the direction of the country is not working either ....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

I’m not sure it’s a winning argument that’s all.

Most people aren’t political if they don’t have to be, the only time they think of politics when they have to vote or something is taken from them.

To call them the opposite of what you are just because they feel like they are unsure because they haven’t thought about it as a way to shame them into your position is to lose them and play into your opposition’s hands - “these crazy people are calling you Nazis/Communists”.

Two sides can play the centrist card to grab the unsure while driving a different agenda - I don’t see what’s stopping the left.

Eg Most people are not aware of how much damage France is doing in west Africa through proxy colonialism - if you ask them they’ll probably shrug. If you ask them to vote on it they’ll pick someone that seems somewhere in the middle. Are they colonialist oppressors? Seems like a far fetch.

Now try to strong arm them into a position, how do you think it’s going to go?

I’m not trying to cause or win an argument, I’ll stop here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago

I think the French saying is a response to rising Fascism. If Fascism is taking power in your society and you do not directly and explicitly oppose it, then you are at the very least going to be tacitly supporting it. By definition, centrism cannot fight Fascism, because it will always "both sides" the problem, which ultimately only benefits the Fascists. This is what we are seeing now in the US with the Democrats. The only realistic opposition to Fascism in this scenario is Leftism.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Most Democrats don't realize that capitalism relies on actual slavery... presently. They don't know that the products they consume revolve around supply chains that even include child slavery. They don't know the actual effects of US imperialism, regime change, and third-world exploitation. They don't know that an estimated 40% of US agricultural workers are undocumented immigrants — modern slaves, with no human rights. I'm not being hyperbolic at all, but I suggest everybody do their own research.

Democrats are propagandized to not want to come to terms with the fact that even first-world workers are slaves. They may not be "owned", but damn near — everybody is getting a raw deal under capitalism besides those that extract the vast majority of value, wealth, power, influence, and control.

Democrats are subjected to intense campaigns that include gaslighting, propaganda, and coercion, while critical facts and the actual reality is veiled to them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even US military policy and the reserve currency is designed to exploit emerging markets. The reason the US can print so much money every year to fund all its programs is because other countries are required to trade in USD so will buy it even though its being inflated so much, and if they decide to trade in something like gold dinars they get overthrown.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

The entire US system is built on top of consumerism. Not saying we are better in NL or Europe, but the US really exploded the consumerism and abused the angelo saxton mindset. Well and the US has been corrupt for a while, probably since it was founded that doesn't help either.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is they have all been extremely successful at demonizing the alternatives. People are hesitant to even think about left ideas because they have been told their entire lives that they are evil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

My main issue with the far left parties in The Netherlands is that they seem to have no understanding of how the tax system works. They would increase social benefits and tax income and houses more. I have seen plans that if they went ahead with it would be taxed even more, but I already get no financial benefit from the government and we make below the median income.

Of course there are more points that they are better at and this post isn't about NL, but still. I believe that there are a lot of people who don't get financial benefit from left parties winning or from right parties winning. Unless they get rich. And then the more conservative option feels closer to home so ofc people vote more for that. That's why you see so many conservative right governments in the west.

At least that's my theory and one of the reasons why I try to vote on competent progressive middle people. At least when possibile.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

They are the same as early-2000s Republicans.

They are not the same as 2025 Republicans, who are literally thieving, murderous Mussolini-emulating fascists.

To be fair, still Republicans… just two decades apart.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll admit Trump is a lot clumsier about saying it out loud, but 2000s Republicans were absolutely on the same wave. Being virulently anti-anyone-dark-than-an-italitan, actively eroding free speech, and hating anyone who worked for a living has been standard conservative shit since at least the 1800s. If anything, the 2000s Republicans had more of a war-boner to boot. Trump did in fact bring the facism home a fair bit more openly, but let's not mistake a new hairdo for a new political movement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The early 2000s Republicans are the same people as 2025 Republicans.

Some of them changed their beliefs. They moved right - or were moved right by an incredibly effective decades-long propaganda campaign.

And some of them didn't change their beliefs at all - they're simply more emboldened to express beliefs that weren't acceptable twenty years ago.

Give it twenty more years and Democrats will be where Republicans are now.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The current Democratic party is basically the Reagan Republicans with more emphasis on civil rights.

US politics have skewed further and further rightward for the last 50 years. On a global scale, Democrats are firmly center-right.

Bernie Sanders and AOC are barely left of center for the rest of the world, but in US politics they're "off the deep end."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

It doesn't help that the US has a two party system in practice and that people really vote for a person and not for their ideals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

dick Cheney endorsed kamala

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but 2000 Republicans blamed Russia for all their problems. And 2025 Democrats blame Russia for... Oh.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Found the source:

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/biden-moderate-democrats-republicans-conservative-study-john-kasich-aoc-a9699431.html

Okay I read the source now and what I found funny is the part where people describe how "moderates" on dating apps are just conservatives. An observation I can regard as true in my experience, they are just self-aware enough to not be dismissed outright, but not self-aware enough to actually change a thing about themselves and become a better person.

Remembering how dating apps for conservative people tend to go down (only dudes, because what chick would engage with those guys...), I find it funny to see this echoed here again. There is, after all, no middle ground on most social issues anymore and we do good to see moderates as just another trick of conservative rebranding to obfuscate what they truly are.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is, after all, no middle ground on most social issues anymore

There never was, unless you consider supporting desegregation but not interracial marriage a middle ground I guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

Middle ground on social issues: "Separate but equal"

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who the fuck cares? Biden isn't in office anymore. Judge by what he accomplished instead of pretending you all know him personally.

Right now we have a literal fascist in office. Something tells me that's a bigger issue. We can play the blame game all day, but unfortunately what's done is done and the time to take action is yesterday.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But the problem is that this is the exact problem that led to the fascist taking office. The most historically unpopular president plagued by every possible crime and scandal, and the democrats run a Republican. That is why they keep losing. They keep people even remotely left of Republican, like Bernie and AOC, at arms length (at best) from the party, while propping up Joe Biden and Nancy pelosi (almost literally). And then they keep saying “this is the most progressive ticket in history!”

They’re selling out any possible goodwill hey had. Which was very little, if any. And then they turn around and point the finger at us. All while capitalizing on the fascists taking office and capitulating to their agenda, while the talking heads go on to and say “the problem is the party got ‘too woke’ and forgot about the everyday Americans!”

They have clearly failed at this since running a fake progressive in Obama, who also proved everything by running a legitimately progressive campaign in 08 and won by historic numbers. I’m not going to say it was the money behind the party that made them stop even pretending they give a shit…but it was (most likely). They are not a legitimate opposition party. And when the choices are between one of two, well that’s a massive fucking problem. And they’re not addressing it.

So, yes. There is a fascist in office. But if this foundational problem doesn’t get solved and the dems keep moving right (while the OW concept of “right” has shifted so far away from center), then the fascists will continue to radicalize, pulling the entire Democratic Party rightward with it.

That is a problem that needs to get solved before we can get a fascist out of power. Unless we’re talking…like, gonzo style.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We just need an entirely new system.

The Democrats will never be truly progressive and they will always tease at being socialist. They don't even address major crises, like the housing crisis, the health care crisis, or the economy — they sit there and gaslight us while playing the blame game to excuse their inaction.

We need progress towards solutions, and they can't even address the issues. How can they work towards solutions if they can't come up with any?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Progressives and Democratic Socialists who once voted Democrat (or who voted Democrat anyway) probably care a lot that they are disenfranchised by Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Judge by what he accomplished

Getting said literal fascist elected by doing fuck all to solve the problems he said he would, gave said fascist a pass by assigning a mealy mouthed investigator, and hanging out in the race long enough to help depress turnout?

We can play the blame game all day, but unfortunately what's done is done and the time to take action is yesterday.

We also need to understand why we got to this place, and saying "who the fuck cares" just emboldens the Dems in power to keep trying the same shit that doesn't work.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

The Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee called for using far-right candidates “as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right.” Clinton’s camp insisted that Trump and other extremists should be “elevated” to “leaders of the pack” and media outlets should be told to “take them seriously.”

Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and mainstream media also played a pretty big role in Trump's rise to power back in 2016.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›