I’ve been waiting for this. Let the social media war begin.
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
459 points (100.0% liked)
politics
24085 readers
3581 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There it is. In the war of narcissist v narcissist, we knew he’d say this.
Edit: Have a nice day DJT!
What a couple of douche canoes.
What would haven been even funnier for Musk to say is "Without me, Trump would have lost, again."
War of roses? Nah, now it is a war of narcisses. How floweryshly cute. Mimimi...
load more comments
(4 replies)
When the World's Richest Man who spent a QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLARS on ONE Candidate says "without me he would have lost", what does that mean?
"I bought him fair and square, but now he's defective. Can I get a refund?"
Also, we're not in a democracy anymore.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is he implying he manipulated the election? Or does it just sound like it?
For once in my life, I want musk to say more.
Not implying, admitting. Here's the data.
https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/
https://electiontruthalliance.org/eta
First and last links are the data. The middle links are for us stupid people that need to be told how to read the data in the last link.
Why would he openly admit to a crime of such magnitude? He's an idiot, but he's not THAT much of an idiot. He wouldn't incriminate himself.
Incriminate himself? He's far too rich for that to matter.
Then And if he did, it wasn't that bad. And if he did, that's not a big deal. And if did, that's not his fault. And if it was, he didn't mean it. And if he did, america deserved it.
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's a bitter feeling that the best defense the US has against a fascist takeover is the incompetence and narcissism of the ones doing the taking over.
Hitler's cabinet was full of these kinds of people too, and he still managed to do a lot of damage. It's not much of a protection.
No shit Nazi. That's why we hate you and want you deported.
Somebody has to dare him to prove it, and maybe he'll show how he rigged the voting counts in the swing states.
Let's hope they do a mutually assured destruction of each other.
The egos are big enough.
CRIPPLE FIGHT
I would pay to see them in a cage match lol
And yes, slaanesh is right.
And yes, slaanesh is right.
Yes, Inquisitor. This one right here.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is this a subtle admission that they cheated? Or is he just implying that he injected so much cash into the campaign that he changed the campaign calculus. I fail to understand how money won the election. Supposedly the dems had over a billion dollars during the campaign, and they lost. So, then whats he trying to say? Money has decreasing returns after a certain level.
Lots of commentary/analysis on the Repubs winning dispite outfunded 1:2. General consensus is that Dems really mismanaged their money on ad campaigns that did nothing whereas Trump was able to secure discussion for free (no surprise) and used media allies for hypertargeting
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Shouldn't Child Protective Services be all over him right now? How can he be allowed to continue doing so much heavy drugs, with his little kids in the next room??
Money.
Dish bro tell us how you did it, give receipts bro lay it out.
That'll prompt a rage post or two. Hopefully The Dipshit focuses his ire on him instead of the innocents for a while, now.
load more comments
(1 replies)