this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
1755 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

8378 readers
2885 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

If Elon said that about epstien that means he knew the entire time and chose not to say anything

[–] [email protected] 136 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So the reason why they're so against women, gay, drag, trans was that they want to be the only drama queens around?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Voter and voted are not the same.

It shows that the ones who are so against women, gay, drag, trans were easily distracted by superficial showmanship. It's actually sad that they can't perceive inner values.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 3 days ago

You hit the nail on the head.

Projection is a requirement to be part of the GOP

[–] [email protected] 96 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Nominate a woman that people actually want to be president and then maybe we can talk.

AOC, for example, is filling football stadiums in red states.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh ya know... It's not her turn. There's like 6 people you've never heard of ahead of her.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Taking turns and democracy are directly opposed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

And make sure they're not flagrantly carrying water for a genocidal ethnostate during the run up to the election. Preferably they will be sane and won't support that kind of thing at all. But this is America, we're currently being led by a dementia addled gameshow host. Sanity is sadly not a prerequisite for the job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

To be fair, AoC wasn't eligible yet until last October.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't help but think that her beauty wouldn't steal some votes at the very least. I'm not trying to be sexist, but I acknowledge that sexist views exist. And even on a base human level, I'd rather look at AOC than trump. That's before looking into their "souls". So if someone were to be in my fucking face 24/7 on all networks, I'd much rather it be a beautiful woman with intelligence and morals than a toxin-covered toad man with no personality other than grabby little hands.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To the credit of AOC, I was able to read all about her opinions and politics before I found out she was hot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Right? Her opinions are a large part of what makes her sexy to me. I'm not trying to emphasize that, but I find empathy attractive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Consecutive terms should be eliminated.

If there is no "incumbency advantage", there will be no excuses to "we cant hold a primary because we 'lose the advantage'" bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There's really no excuse here, incumbency or no.

They knew Clinton was unpopular because she first lost to Obama and they had to rig her primary against Sanders. Harris couldn't even beat out Tulsi Gabbard in a primary and the president demanding that she be crowned the candidate has evident dementia.

Say what you will about Donald (and I don't like him either), but he wasn't so weak that he had to forego the primaries)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I literally never seen anybody say this outside of left wing people online complaining about people supposedly saying it like it's an epidemic.

If the only takeaway that the Democrats have from the 2024 election is that they lost because of racism and sexism then they're cooked.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your life experiences don't necessarily reflect those of everyone else, FYI. I've seen and heard this or some other "women are too emotional/illogical/irrational/cryptic/ect too many times.

There are relatively recent studies/surveys, like this one (PDF) that suggest that a pretty significant portion of the population still feel women are too emotional to be in politics. 13% as of 2019 in that one.

While I'd think—or at least hope—that this is still going down overall, the rise in conservativism is definitely slowing the decline.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But your study proves my point though. The percentage was 13% across all demographics back in 2018 when the study was conducted. If you actually look at at the graphs, they all show a pretty significant and stead drop over the decades. Well, 2018 was 7 years ago, so if project the data to the modern day, it's very likely that figure is in the single digits now.

Even if we assume that the data remained steady since then, which it probably hasn't, then that means at least 87% of the population don't hold this view. That's not just a majority, that's an overwhelming majority. So while my experience is ancedotal, this shows that my experiences are actually unique but a part of much bigger societal trend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If you actually look at at the graphs, they all show a pretty significant and stead drop over the decades.

if you actually read my comment, I've already mentioned its decline. maybe you need a refresher. :)

means at least 87% of the population don't hold this view.

thanks. believe it or not, I do know how percentages work. But at no point did I claim that most of the population feels this way.

A group of people doesn't have to be a majority to be statistically significant. If 13% of people suddenly woke up with arms growing from the tops of their heads, you'd be noticng them all the damn time, unless you're a recluse.

This absolutely has a real-world effect on who is voted into office, especially when you also consider which demographics vote. And consequently, less exposure to women in politics in office = a slower rate of acceptance of them.

Not to mention, again, the rise of conservatism that is certainly not helping the matter.

So while my experience is ancedotal, this shows

Yeah so as I mentioned, I've had a different experience. Are you a woman? Do you frequently seek out discussions about/research on/history of women? gender studies? inequality?

Because otherwise, there's no wonder why you haven't experienced what I have.

Your experience doesn't show anything. Neither does mine, because anecdotes are not, nor ever will be, valid evidence of anything useful in discussions about social or political issues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

A group of people doesn’t have to be a majority to be statistically significant. If 13% of people suddenly woke up with arms growing from the tops of their heads, you’d be noticng them all the damn time, unless you’re a recluse.

The central issue issue here revolves around whether or not this is percentage is significant. You specifically said that this figure is statistically significant, which means it's calculated somewhere, right? Is this something that's calculated in the report? Did you calculate yourself? If so what was the chosen neutral baseline?

If there are no calculations and this is just your opinion, then I gotta say that I disagree with you. Your making the assumption that the 13% behave as a bloc, which doesn't sound likely.

For example, it is highly unlikely that everybody who holds this opinion is a registered or active voter. According to the Census Bureau, in the 2024 election, 73.6% of eligible voters were registered and only 65.3% were registered to vote. It's also likely that many of the people who hold this opinion are still willing to vote for women candidates even if they prefer male candidates. According to a 2019 Gallup survey, 94% of Americans were willing to vote for a female president.

This conclusion is further strengthened by the survey you shared because it showed that this 13% isn't made up of just a few demographics, but rather it's spread across all demographics. Considering how different demographics vote very differently in elections, it is very unlikely that this 13% has the ability to sway elections as you seem to imply... unless you have evidence to show that it does.

Your experience doesn’t show anything. Neither does mine, because anecdotes are not, nor ever will be, valid evidence of anything useful in discussions about social or political issues.

Okay, that is fair. However, we're using actual data now, and the data seems to indicate that my original assumption is correct. This is something that's rare in our society.

[–] [email protected] 109 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They reached the most sensible, logical conclusion: deport musk and impeach trump.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Fuck it. Impeach Elon, and deport trump as well, while we're at it. Deport them both to Afghanistan, since that wouldn't be cruel or anything, right? Just sending people wherever you feel like it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Didn't one of Trump's grand or great grandparent come here illegally? Sounds like he needs to visit El Salvador

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

His wife would be illegal by current ICE standards so her and her anchor baby Barron should be deported or sent to El Salvador.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 113 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

“Imagine how much worse it would have been if it was women?”

(edit:)
— voters who choose GOP

[–] FistingEnthusiast 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

~~Why do you choose to be a misogynistic dick when you could just shut your mouth?~~

Alright, Gotcha, and I appreciate your position

The written word is tricky, it loses nuance

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

~~I can't imagine.
Can you mansplain?~~

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

cheers, I abhor the '/s' tag, but it would have clicked here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Anger isn't an emotion - it's alpha male psychology, or something? Honestly I lost track while laughing as two of the worst people on Earth started going at each other like a pair of angry cats.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How is anger not an emotion?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That was sarcasm.

You know how parts of the manosohere like to claim men are the voice of reason incarnate and women shouldn't be trusted with any responsibility because they're too emotional?

Part of that facade is to act like anger isn't an emotion, because when they suppress "unmanly" emotions like sadness and fear, they tend to channel them into anger instead.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Well fuck, when you put it that way, I will not only upvote this, but change my previous down vote to an upvote as well, and then jerk off. That last part is unrelated to your explanation, just thought you'd like my schedule for the day, starting now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Earlier today my wife sent me a link to an article about the Trump/Elon drama and compared it to our teenager's high school bullshit level feuds.

Pretty much hit the nail on the head.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

compared it to our teenager’s high school bullshit level feuds.

Pretty accurate, these losers never mentally matured past the age of 14.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

self-destruction

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I had to look up what TDS is and for others, it's short for "Trump Derangement Syndrome", an epithet MAGA put on people they don't like to insinuate that they fear Trump and his ilk.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

I assumed it was some ketamine side effect.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›