this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
537 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12477 readers
1220 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 95 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm reading the comments about this video, and I think people are missing the point.

It's not about the Telsa running into the kid. It's about the Tesla completely ignoring the FLASHING FUCKING STOP SIGN at the side of the bus, which resulted in it hitting the kid dummy.

This could have been a pedestrian crossing, railroad stop, intersection, etc.

These vehicles aren't "smart" and should not be allowed on the road. Any idiot can have greater awareness than a Tesla.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No 'smart' device is smart.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

you wouldn't say that to his face, would you? 🥺

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

With a hammer to the camera

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it might kill the kid, it might not.

Im still gonna stick to my ford F50000 Fleshreaper (BLOOD FOR THE CAR GOD!™) driven by a good old fashioned human to get the job done.

Besides, it avoids the whole mess of theological issues about who gets moloch's love.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh, now I get it. Didn‘t know it’s not allowed to pass the bus even when it’s on the other side of the street. In our country we teach the kids to not run across the street when they get out of the bus.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Kids will do stupid things sometimes, no avoiding that. In Germany you can pass a stopped bus on the other side of the road, but if it has its hazards on, you can't go faster than walking speed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Sounds like a typical driver in the US

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

What the hell is wrong with the author of that article? Jesus christ

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Seriously, it was written like a 1980s interview with Boy George. No thought, missing words, and even sentences with no subject.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

All of his questions are easily answered by rubbing two neurons together for a couple seconds.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

The only difference is that a driver would get out of their car, check for damage to their vehicle, and then get mad at the kid! /s

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm a school bus driver and this year we finally got the automatic cameras that catch people going past our red flashers and stop signs. My camera has captured about two to three drivers per day doing this. I would have rather had the automatic machine guns but the camera is a fine second choice.

Edit: the funniest thing I've had happen with the camera so far is one person that came flying past my reds, noticed the lights and stop sign as they were passing me, slammed on their brakes and then backed up past me again while mouthing "I'm so sorry" to me. Yes, they received two tickets for this - and I had nothing to do with it as the cameras are completely automated.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

do they get tickets in the mail?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, that's how it works. A lot of people just never pay them, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Do people in the US just get away with not paying tickets?

Over here, if you don't pay fines, it will get escalated until the point of seizure, and if you have nothing else to seize, they will take your car.

Not paying isn't really an option.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well there is the problem right there, FSD shouldn't be doing these tests in the first place! How else is Tesla supposed to get their amazing cyber taxi out of it has to follow all these dumb rules?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Not American, but I think FSD stands for Full Self-Driving, not an organization.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

It's fine, they'll fix these issues in time for the robotaxi rollout ten years from now.

What's that? They're planning on launching the robotaxis at the end of this month? Well then.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

its not that the car is programmed poorly, it just really hates children

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Hunter Seeker Mode: School Busses. Easy Prey.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's pretty good, they're fairly small targets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If I worked at Tesla, I would very much be doing a crappy job and slipping bad ideas into what looks like good code. The Lord's work.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

How would you know where to put it among all the other shitty code?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn’t I just read this like a few weeks ago? But there’s a Jun 15 date in the article. So did this happen again?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's the same story making the rounds.

Edit: They also did it in Austin and somewhere else, so same situation in 2 different spots, generating like 4-5x the stories as each one gets repeated in the news cycle

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty normal for a Tesla.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a school bus driver. This is also totally normal for human-driven vehicles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Great, they've invented Christine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'll give you my uneducated findings: self driving cars are not ready.

I doubt they will ever be really ready, they'll eventually be considered "ready enough" no software will always work without flaws. When that software controls a car a minor flaw might mean 20 deaths.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Isn't Waymo in San Francisco completely self driving? And if their own recently released data is anything to go by, it would seem self driving cars are more ready than manually controlled cars. Because people are absolutely awful at driving.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Way is also operating in a fairly small fixed area that is highly mapped.

Not saying that's a bad thing, they are doing things the right way, slowly and cautiously.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Waymo cars use much better technology than Tesla.

Nobody is disputing that a machine that is never distracted and has reaction times down to fractions of a second would make a better driver than even the most skilled human, but Tesla's FSD hardware and software aren't there yet and probably never will be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Still safer than a human driver tbh

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's shrimply not true. The numbers Tesla releases are heavily cooked.

Had a quick look around but I didn't manage to find any numbers that weren't either using Tesla'd numbers, or guessing.

But it's pretty well known that FSD sucks (have been in a car using it .. terrifying af) and that it'll turn itself off before an accident to pass accountability to the driver.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I love how this keeps getting repeated by everyone everywhere

it’ll turn itself off before an accident to pass accountability to the driver.

But both Tesla (5 seconds) and the NHSTA (30 seconds) count any incident where a L2 system was on before the accident as having happened with the system active. So no, they do not use it for that purpose.

You know that video going around a few weeks ago where some dude with FSD on darted across the rode into a tree? Well, he got the cars data, and it turns out it was disabled due to enough torque on the wheel which is one of the ways you disable it. He probably nudged the wheel too hard by mistake and disabled it, or there was a mechanical failure which disabled it, but the accident counted as FSD in the report he got from Tesla as ON even though it was OFF at the time of the accident when he started going out of his lane.

So please just stop it with that nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I may be buying the foolishness of the masses, but your anecdotes are only as good as mine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Which part don't you like?

I could source the crash report and a video explaining what likely happened, but if you simply don't believe that Tesla truly stands by the 5s rule in their self reported data even with the crash report, then that's another matter entirely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

what about this one? https://youtu.be/V2u3dcH2VGM

I don't know anything about self driving, but I can't imagine why it would turn off right before a crash instead of keeping the breaks held

(also I know the drivers is a total idiot and it's 100% their fault, I just want to know why it turned off)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have 0 killed children in 25 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When any one car has had automatic emergency braking for 25 years, I may refer to it here. For now, I can safely say that nearly every single current auto-braking car also has 0 child fatalities. Other humans, however, do not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Despite doors blowing off, Boeing planes are safer than human drivers tbh. You'd think tech fans would understand the importance of logic in computers. Red means stop.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's fine because those were non fascist kids

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I’ve seen some comments elsewhere about how it can be trusted.

Edit; like really straight up trusted. The delusion is unreal.

load more comments
view more: next ›