this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
1907 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72000 readers
2632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 402 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I get the impression that the cops are about to hate facial recognition all of the sudden, for no particular reason

[–] [email protected] 177 points 5 days ago (25 children)

There's a reason ICE conceal their faces.

They know what they're doing is wrong and don't want to be held accountable if their fascist rule collapses.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Cameras. They fucking hate body cameras. When it clears them of wrongdoing, they have the video ready. When they 'accidentally' shoot a guy nine times in the back of the head, video seems to be missing.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

easily solvable problem: losing the footage is indication of guilt. you shoot someone, you better have it ready. it malfunctioned, better have a partner who has theirs ready. if no one has footage to clear you, it's used as evidence of guilt.

of course pussy ass lawmakers will never do that.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I believe having lack of evidence being the evidence for a crime is problematic, but it sure is evidence enough that they aren't fit for their job and they should immediately lose it. Everyone Including the supervisor who failed to run the team properly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Upvoted and agreed, not least because I just learned that "all of the sudden," while at present a nonstandard variant of "all of a sudden," has valid history.

And of course it doesn't matter in this casual context!

But in formal writing, in this era, using "a" will avoid distracting the reader from your main point.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago (8 children)

"All of the sudden" is only valid because it's so commonly (incorrectly) used. Much as it annoys me, that's just how language works.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 139 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

If only CSI enhancing worked in real life, we could out the asshole on the far left.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

far left

From his PoV, he's actually standing on the far-right. Fitting lol

[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (34 children)

I agree with that the abusive cops and ice is insane in the US, and it should be stopped. I also believe that the US is a corrupt nation in nearly every place of the government and surrounding instances.

But a question surround this, what if the US wasn't corrupt and the judges would actually follow the law (juries wouldn't be able to exist for most cases) and hypothetical if the US had privacy laws for everything besides businesses wouldn't this be the same punishable offence that would protect citizens?

In GDPR countries (among others) nobody is allowed to do something like this with face recognition because the law works for everybody. (Some people are trying to destroy this in some countries, though).

At the same time, if the government is allowed to use facial recognition and other anti-privacy measures to identify people where there is no ground to, then why shouldn't the people be able to do that?

Edit: I am not from the US and my look on life and trias political situations is different than what the fuck is happening in the US

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Well, the US Supreme court did explicitely say cops have no expectation of anonymity while doing their job. This is completely legal. Its premised on the idea that cops arent there to be abusive but to uphold the law, which is not always actually true. The root of the problem is cops behavior themselves rather than the recording or identifying of them. Up until very recently cops at least had their names visible and were required to show ID upon request.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (7 children)

In GDPR countries (among others) nobody is allowed to do something like this with face recognition because the law works for everybody.

IDK the specifics of GDPR (and GDPR is relatively new, so it will continue to evolve for some time...)

In my view: the police are public servants, salaries and pensions paid by taxes. They have voluntarily chosen to serve as public servants. Whole hosts of studies show that police who are actively involved with the communities they police, seeing, being seen, being known by the neighborhoods they work in, those police are more effective at preventing crime, defusing domestic disputes, etc. than faceless thugs with batons and guns who only show up when they are going to use their arrest powers to shut down whatever is going on.

If I were to write "my version" of the GDPR that I think the US should enact, there would be clear exceptions for public servants, including police and politicians. Now, you can get into the whole issue of "undercover cops" which is clearly analogous to "secret police" which may be a necessary evil for some circumstances, but that's not what is going on with OP's website. OP is providing a tool to compare photos to a public database of photographs of public servants - not undercover cops. By the way: performance is spec'ed at 1 to 3 seconds per photo comparison, so 9000 photos might take 9000-27000 seconds to compare, that's 2.5 to 7.5 hours to run one photo search.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In GDPR countries (among others) nobody is allowed to do something like this with face recognition because the law works for everybody.

Lmao, in france facial recognition is being rolled out all over and we got laws explicitly prohibiting the filming of cops (ofcourse, the only reasonable action to take against the documented brutality of the pigs /s)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

If the police weren't unaccountable invaders, and just, liked, issued annoying tickets or whatever instead of murdering children and doing to crowds of peaceful civilians things that would be war crimes if done to uniformed enemy soldiers literally any tike they assemble, or even if the obes who actually did that stuff were punished literally at all when they did, i don't think anyone would have even thought to do this.

They are abd they do and they don't, though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The answer is that I don't think it matters because the US or any other society will never reach some utopic standard of privacy. So long as we live in a world where facial recognition is possible - it is better to regulate it strongly than attempt to prohibit it.

In a modern globalized world the old privacy is dead, no matter how you look at it. Going forward something new will need to be built out of the ashes, be it a new privacy or something better/worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] [email protected] 153 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 155 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 125 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 122 points 5 days ago

This is ILLEGAL when Working Class people Do It!

-Chuck Schumer at Some Point probably!

[–] [email protected] 100 points 5 days ago (15 children)

Is it me or is LA the only part of America doing anything resembling resistance?

[–] [email protected] 105 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think it's mainly LA that is seeing a large invasion of federal forces

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 days ago

For the moment

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No, it’s happening everywhere. But I’ve also seen some significant resistance happening in other cities like NYC, Newark, Portland, Chicago, Seattle, SF, etc.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 4 days ago (3 children)

nice.

Is there one for ice too?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Also what about cops outside of the LAPD? This app only useful if it works on any cop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I took a selfie and it told me I was an ice agent.... Wtf I'm such a piece of shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No. Those are gravy Seal wannabees. Ice isn't doing anything on the streets. They are doing the behind the scenes stuff. Deputized bounty hunters are the ones in the streets. No badge, no authority, and as you know instantly disavowed.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

So the people doing the snatching are gig workers? Is there a TaskRabbit for fascism?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Lmao let's see how long it takes them to shut this down

[–] [email protected] 65 points 5 days ago (19 children)

What are they so afraid of? They're public servants, so they should be publicly identifiable. If they don't like it, get off the government payroll

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

Should be the ice agents too

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 days ago

Putting it out there for someone to do this for cops in the UK. I can't run infrastructure but the cops terrorise out local community and constantly refuse to identify themselves/turn off their badge cam.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago

Police the police

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

This is nice. Use their own weapons against these fuckers.

load more comments
view more: next ›