they have this around the zoo to there, basically a very low-traffic area too.
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)
Fuck Cars
12491 readers
815 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If your speed cameras catch 100k violators a month, you've built the streets wrong.
Either build high speed roads with few intersections, limited access, and generous amounts of clearance to allow for high speed cars with less danger. Or build low speed narrow streets to keep traffic moving slowly.
The us builds high speed roads with frequent intersections with pedestrians a few inches away. This is a fundamentally dangerous design. It can't be fixed with ticketing and cameras. Tear out the roads.
People don’t take the danger of driving seriously enough. I hope we come to view this as a lack of empathy.
I hope we come to view this as a lack of empathy.
It's not that at all, look at the road where it's happening... It's fucking 22 god damn meters(72 feet) wide from kerb to kerb, and the speed limit is 35mph(56kph)...
The main issue is the road is very poorly designed.
I've seen this type of comment quite a lot here, and regardless of if you meant it that way I think it needs to be said for the benefit of all:
Bad road design does not excuse speeding.
Yes, changing the design is the more effective way to reduce the speed of traffic to a safe level. But just because the design was bad does not mean drivers can drive whatever feels right to them. The drivers still have a personal responsibility to drive safely, which in most cases means the same speed as the other vehicles, which means the speed limit bc that's the only one everyone can agree on.
If the road design tempts you to sin, cut off your engine.
This is true. But practically (And generally) speaking: Redesigning a poor road makes cars go slower. Putting up a speed camera on a poor road does not. I get the desire to bring reckless drivers justice. But if the goal is to create safe streets for users, which option is closer to true justice?
That said it should be noted that safe streets are three-pillared: Infrastructure, Education, Enforcement. You generally can't do it with just one, and even an infrastructure-focused solution would be best to also lean on at least one of the other two, ideally all three.
It seems to me like you're struggling to empathise with people that speed 😂( which if you don't drive is completely fair 😂)
But yeah I agree it's not a good excuse for speeding, just trying to say that putting a sign up is not very effective. It's better than nothing though and a good first step.
But adding speed cameras, while it might help a bit to reduce speeds, it's not very effective, and a much better solution would be removing the root cause of the problem: car centric infrastructure.
Speed cameras don't prevent people from speeding, they just punish people after the fact, whereas better designed roads prevent it from even happening in the first place.
Will be interesting to see once the fines start. Might just be an inconvenience to the ultra wealthy who might carry on but on the other hand people don't like losing money, and it just takes a few cars to slow down to force everyone else to. Do you have ant points system or mechanism that will take away your licence for multiple tickets?
I much prefer speed traps to red light cameras that are often predatory and don’t make intersections safer.
None of that nonsense. Implementing actual, physical traffic-calming infrastructure is where it's at. And bollards. Lots of bollards.
We just need walkable cities and to gradually increase to acreage of car-free zones.
💯 A better solution through design instead of applying a technological Band-Aid.
I think both can be useful.
The most effective speed management I've seen are the average speed camera zones. There's a 50+ mile stretch with a 70mph limit near me, and very few (if any) folk ignore them and exceed the limit - as opposed to static cameras which involve someone doing excess speed; slamming on the anchors on approach to the camera; before hooning it back up to whatever speed they were doing before.
The downside to avg speed zones is that it encourages drivers to pop on a cruise control technology and zone out, but then I would imagine that people in that category would tune out on cruise control whether they were in a speed zone or not.
Nothinh predatory about rule enforcement! Hell yeah SF
In my town, the red light cameras tend to cause drivers to slam on the brakes when the light changes. The equipment is often owned by a third-party that loans it to the city and places stipulations like very short light times to produce more profit.
It does look like there’s significant evidence that speed traps do improve safety.
stipulations like very short light times
This probably invalidates the tickets under the definition of a "crime" in basically every common law system. Crimes has to be willful.
Many crimes have "Strict Liability" where criminal intent is not necessary for one to be guilty.
If only it worked like that in practice everywhere. It’s a pretty addictive revenue stream, and the district is incentivized to bend the rules to collect their money.
Of course, I write this from the US, which is currently at critical levels of internal corruption, so this could be a factor.
Yes, yet another way even the requirement to show up in court is used to suppress regular people.
FYI, these are speed cameras, not red light cameras. They're set such that you'd need to be doing 36+ mph in a 25 mph zone.