this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
239 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21682 readers
1109 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago

I judt want everyone to shit up in every way about their fantasy story of choice the want to treat as if real.

To me people who talk about their religion as if it were a real thing are to me exactly the same as people with mental issues who have imaginary friends up until hogh age or who cannot tell reality from fantasy.

I don't bring this view up by myself buy absolutely drive it at max speed if some idiots on the road ask me "may I talk with you about how god can save you?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

"don't be involved with any of these cults" is the resulting message.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Evangelical totals to 99%??

[–] [email protected] 72 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This makes sense if you know what the word evangelize means

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It means they fight with big robots, right?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Whoda thunk that evangelicals be the most evangelical? Wild.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

It’s almost like words… mean… something?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Let me in so I can love you, or you'll be sorry of what I'll do to you if you don't let me in!

[–] [email protected] 53 points 16 hours ago

It’s literally in the name, to ~~harass~~ “evangelize.”

Catholics already did the institutional takeovers and the crusades.

Still violent, still oppressive but not in the same, individual, in-your-face way that American Evangelicals are. May be partly bias but the latter freak me out way more than the former, especially where they take over politics so aggressively.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Tell me Father, should I convert?"

"Meh... I wouldn't."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They are kinda like that. If you aren’t born in the Catholic Church, it’s kind of a pain to get in. You have to do classes for at least a year and have someone sponsor you. It makes sense - they take their belief seriously and want to make sure that people joining know what they’re getting into

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sponsor? You just need a priest willing to give you sacraments, starting with baptism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. If you go through the Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults (RCIA), you get baptized, given communion, and get confirmed all at the same time on Easter. Having a sponsor is part of the sacrament of confirmation.

At least that’s the way my church growing up did it. I’m sure there are exceptions for extenuating circumstances and differences across countries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago

That how it was and still is. Grew up Catholic. Have a best friend who sponsored his significant other to convert. This was the exact process.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 16 hours ago

most salesman want more customers

[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, a former evangelical, now a full on atheist, but I have to say, in a logical standpoint.. belief in hell, and belief that you should mind your own business, seem at odds in a general stance. If you literally believe your god, views non belief as such a crime, that anyone following it deserves to be tortured for all of eternity, it logically follows that you should do everything in your power to convince them otherwise.

The concept of a you do you and not my problem is on par with say... being a die hard trump supporter, going out every week with "mass deportations now" signs. Then going out and grabbing a beer with your undocumented immigrant friends and saying to them "You're a cool guy, lets hang out until ice finds you and gives you what you deserve".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There's a not uncommon belief that people that have not been exposed to Christianity are exempt from the whole hell thing.

The logical conclusion of that belief is, of course, that evangelising is just about the most evil thing you can do as you are condemning people by removing their exemption. Funnily enough, I never met someone who held that belief that reached that conclusion.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Exposed yes, but also noted almost all of them consider "exposed" as a fairly low bar as well. IE it's safe to say 99.999% of american's are exposed and chosing to reject.

But yeah the general idea of making sure small niche tribes in affrica never hear it, seems like a good way to protect them.

Same logic also could be applied to the idea that babies and kids under a certain age that die get a free trip to heaven. At which point the only logical conclusion is... a baby murderer is actually the most self sacrificing good human possible... such would be dooming himself to hell, while saving every baby he kills, self sacrifice is the greatest possible moral action. Why let babies grow up with the possibility they might reject god when they are old enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

We just won ourselves the abortion debate, time to make tshirts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

In both situations, it's oppression. There is no other way to look at it. It's no wonder why evangelicals are, by and large, conservatives that support Trump.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

This is from 2020; It seems like we might have more recent data and there's been some shifts?

This is the 2025 report from the same group: https://www.nationalsurveyreligiousleaders.org/s/NSRL-report-2025-clergy-in-america.pdf

They say (page 28):

Evangelical clergy, by contrast, stand out as especially conversionist, with 82% agreeing that it is important to try to persuade people to join them. Only 35% of mainline clergy agreed that such conversion attempts are important, compared to 41% of Black ministers and 52% of Catholic priests saying that. Consistent with their more ecumenical views, mainline clergy are less likely than clergy in any other group to agree that it is important for them to try to persuade people in other religions to accept their religion instead of the person’s current one, though the differences between the mainline percentage and the Catholic and Black Protestant percentages are not statistically significant at the conventional level.

Same question in the new report is here; seems like it's from the same data round though? So that's a bit confusing:

There is an additional question, on how this varies for 'primary' ministers vs others on page 77; feels like it should be broken down by religion first, but I haven't looked closely.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago

Consistent with their more ecumenical views

I.... Can't help myself....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

And this is why my friends and I play a silly game every time missionaries go stomping about the neighborhood, the goal, get them to talk as long as possible (my record is 45 min.)

This does two things, the first is that they arnt going to bother anyone else (Im very not interested and am trying to not have them waste anyone else's time). The second is a lot harder, it is an opportunity to try and get in some deprogramming. Direct all your conversation at the younger person, JW and mormons do this most often but we have a few cults in the area and this is important for them too. Be nice, offer them tea, engage in the philisophy they are peddling, play the role of Socrates and ask annoying questions but dont come off as condesending. A lot of cults need to scare their younger members into staying in the fold, prove that having a nice conversation with the friendly atheist down the street wont cause them to burst into flames.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

They have to keep the money flowing somehow. These fucks actually don't care about doing good. Just enrichment of their net worth. It's easy to see.