A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
Iirc, that's because none of the items mentioned in this post actually are lasers in the star wars universe. They're actually supercharged bolts of plasma.
Laser weapons are considered primitive tech. Like who wants a space gun that just fires into infinity? You might blow up something incredibly far away by mistske.
Pictured are space-bombers. They drop gravity bombs... in space. Please stop talking about scientific accuracy in Star Wars.
During all my life, from all the movies, EU, and games, they have specialized ships to do bombardment missions,. Y wings, and A wings for surgicals.
This fucking scene threw me off so hard... it was so fucking stupid. Just like the rest of the movie eventually.
Remember how in TESB, Han and Leia land in an asteroid crater/cave to hide and go out in the vacuum with nothing but an emergency airplane O2 mask thinking that's OK? And gravity is earth normal gravity?
I'm pretty sure "a galaxy far far away" means the laws of physics are a bit different.
Also, let people enjoy things.
While that happening, there are also TIE bombers flying past dropping bombs on them.
Suspension of disbelief, or belief in suspension tech?
Start with land speeders... what holds them up? If you're in a universe where it's simple to make anti-gravity devices, why not use them to "fly" your big space ships too?
A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, they knew things we still do not, and apparently they did not know many things that we do.
I remember seeing this shit in theaters and losing my mind over how stupid it was. It's in the middle of an incredibly bad movie anyway which doesn't help, but I just can't imagine how many people had to be involved with this creative choice and how ar least some of them must have brought up how stupid dropping bombs like that is in a space fight and yet they still went with it. Dumbest shit ever.
Didn’t TIE bombers bomb asteroids in TESB when Solo and crew were hiding in a giant worm? Sure looked similar, IIRC.
That's like a land mass at least. In this scene they were doing this in straight up open space against another ship
but there's gravity in space. surely that means there's dropping stuff in space too!
Im honestly more concerned on how those bombs make it through the atmosphere and how much time it takes them to reach their destination.
star trek, and some other scifi genre captures it better, SW is more for children, it also magic-tech in it, so not really a true scifi.
It's a Sci-fi space opera.
Literally. No point in it being hyper realistic
My dad likes to contend that Star Wars is a western. And he makes a compelling argument with how it indeed has all the tropes and hallmarks of a western.
Basically a mix of Westerns and Samurai flicks.
SW is for children is not a great take. It's just not sci-fi, and shouldn't be judged as such. It's a space fantasy, and it leans into the camp and the suspension of disbelief. They use wings and aerodynamics in space. Destroyed ships "sink." The good guys never get hit and the bad guys die in one shot. Now, the new movies were absolutely disappointing, but Star Wars was never sci-fi, at least not in the ways this discussion is defining the genre.
Not all star wars is the same. While I agree that it is space fantasy rather than sci-fi, some of it is more serious and well made than the rest. I have absolutely loved Andor, Rogue one and Solo, and the first and second series of the Mandalorian. It's starwars with very limited force use.
While the space flight isn't realistic, the wings aren't really a problem. Look at the space shuttle.... Real spacecraft with wings.
Oh, I wasn't complaining about any of those things. I think they're awesome. X-Wings and TIE fighters are definitely not using their S-foils for reentry gliding though. I'm a huge Star Wars fan. I think it requires a level of suspension of belief to engage in the storytelling, because it's not supposed to be at all realistic. There is also plenty of Star Wars media that is definitely not for kids or fits closer into sci-fi, but even Andor, the most sci-fi of the Star Wars media I've watched, was definitely still leaning on its fantasy roots.
Indeed the X-wing "wings" are more supports to mount weapons on than they are airfoil. Tie fighters have a totally different approach to flight.
Andor is of course beholden to the fantasy world it is set in, it did convince me as a sound socio-political story. The fears and distrusts both of the rebels and the military/ intelligence services, the anti Ghorman propaganda, it's awesome.
Andor was awesome. Considering that the fighters in Star Wars do aerodynamic flight and sound is not just added for effect but audible in universe, I've always subscribed to the head canon that in the Star Wars universe, space is a gas of some sort. We also see people in space that die of suffocation, not pressure shock. The name S-foils also implies a similar purpose to airfoils, but the canon isn't even consistent on that. Some TIE models explicitly use their S-foils aerodynamically in atmosphere, but other ships are ambiguous.
George Lucas literally said himself it was for kids.
I don't think a defense of the most-hated parts of the prequels is a great argument. This comes across as George Lucas misreading his audience and trying to defend a product that missed the mark for most of his serious fans.
They aren't lasers, though. That's just a colloquial term. Like how we call large language models AI.
Yeah, to add on to this:
At least back in the 90s/00s, the canon explanation from various books and such is roughly...
The 'lasers' are actually coherent 'bolts' of highly energetic plasma, ie, gas excited/heated to the point that electrons are breaking out of their atomic orbitals, extremely thermally hot, capable of doing immense burn damage, melting a hole through you or most other armors/materials/alloys.
The explanation is that 'laser' weapons, and 'turbolaser' canons... by some arcane process, as the plasma travels through the barrel of the weapon, it is somehow encased in, or enveloped by, or transformed into having a very strong, self contained psuedo-magnetic forcefield, that keeps the plasma from just immediately expanding in all directions upon exiting the barrel, and keeps it vaguely spatially constrained and coherent.
It is supposed to be a sort of analogy to how rifling in a conventional firearm makes the bullet much more accurate... and it also kind of intuitively thus makes sense that a big, fuck off huge barrel, can throw a larger projectile downrange, and faster.
Its also sort of how a rail gun or coil gun works in real life, but not really.
In universe, plasma bolts do not travel at light speed, they also do not travel forever: they dissapate and sort of evaporate or fizzle out after travelling a certain distance, and this generally occurs more quickly from smaller weapons than it does from larger weapons.
Basically, their 'coherence field' is only stable for a short time, sort of like a gel capsule for a drug dissolves in your stomach after a certain amount of time.
This is again another rough analogy to real world ballistics with solid bullets or shells... irl, longer barrels are able to increase the kinetic emergy imparted to a projectile, thus increasing its muzzle velocity, thus increasing its effective range.
Ammo is also a thing that exists in a lot of older Star Wars canon. A blaster will eventually run out of the... plasma fuel, which is often contained in essentially a magazine... and technically, all blasters also need either the rough equivalent of a starter engine, or an independent battery/'ignition' system to actually do the process of transforming the 'ammo' into a plasma bolt, and accelerate it out of the barrel and cohere it into a bolt.
I also recall Tibanna gas, from Cloud City, being specifically mentioned as a primary component of blaster ammunition in at least one of the Rogue Squadron games, though it apparently gets more complicated with different colored plasma bolts essentially being made of different blends of different kinds of input materials having different properties and only working properly in certain kinds of blasters, again, a sort of rough analogy to different calibers of bullets and barrels and chambers.
...
Light sabers follow a similar overall principle of 'plasma bolt contained by some kind of coherence field'... but they use totally different internals to generate both the plasma and coherence field, and can seemingly just... do this nearly infinitely, never needing to 'reload', never running out of energy.
Those internals?
Magic (kyber) crystals and an extremely esoteric, basically electronic circuit design.
This is why so much emphasis is placed on a Jedi constructing their own lightsaber as a fundamental rite of passage:
Every lightsaber is bespoke, unique, you have to be essentially supernaturally intelligent, ie, sufficiently in tune with the Force, to be able to comprehend how to actually construct one... and indeed, there are at least a few instances or mentions of where someone attempts this, fucks it up, and their malformed lightsaber basically blows up in their face.
You can also see the 'coherence' principle at play as a light saber... well the 'blade' grows out of the hilt, as the coherence field expands... but it never disconnects, it never expels the plasma bolt away from the hilt.
...
So, if everything, lightsaber 'blades' and plasma 'bolts' are both encapsulated by some sort of pseudo magnetic coherence field, it makes some amount ofintuitive sense that if you get them close to each other, they will repel, deflect, ricochet.
... But, this cannot be just the electromagnetic force as we understand it in our world, because... well, that shit doesn't actually make any sense by our understanding of physics.
We have no idea how to create a self sustaining magnetic field that can be projected away from the source of what created the field and just... keeps sustaining itself on its own...
And EM is just + or -, either attactive or repulsive, so we would expect to see say a + bolt and a + lightsaber be capable of deflection... but a + bolt and a - saber, or even a + saber and a - saber... well those should actually be attractive, so you'd end up with a bolt that curves toward a light saber and then combines with it, or even two sabers being drawn toward each other and then merging.
...
In conclusion: Star Wars is science fantasy in the sense that it seems to operate under a... not completely alien, but significantly distinct set of basic laws of physics... you'd probably have to be a Jedi or Sith to truly understand how they actually work =P
"Real" lasers also show up sometimes in the old EU. They're mostly explained away as outdated tech and "blasters are better" and that even the wimpy-est of force fields will stop them. There's not nothing to that either. A laser you either need to hold it exactly on target for a measure of time or have a massive amount of cooling in the emitter. If you can just "send plasma" in that direction instead it solves those problems.
"Slugthrowers", i.e. 'real guns', also show up and "blasters are better" because the bolt is faster and doesn't suffer as much from aerodynamic effects. But a lightsaber user is going to have problems if a bullet is now just molten instead of being reflected away.
That's leaning a lot into the older EU though which is much more a universe like 40k where tech just "is" and people maybe don't understand the mechanics of how it works anymore.
And of course it's significantly much more about the rule of cool than real physics.
Yep, you got it!
There indeed are older kinds of weapon tech, ... but yeah, they havent't been widely used for like... thousands, tens of thousands of years before the Battle of Yavin 4.
It does indeed end up being a sort of... largely post technological progress setting, most things are ossified... almost everytime something is doing something 'novel' with tech... its basically been done before, or its just outright a 'find the lost relic' scenario, and yeah, you do run into weird situations where 'ancient relics' can actually be quite useful in more or less rare and specific scenarios.
Hell, you can even say that... the Force itself is roughly analagous to the Warp, in many ways.
Maybe I'm just old, but I can't stand how magic the " kyber" crystals are in the rewritten sequel canon. In older legends canon, there was no "the crystal chooses the Jedi blah blah blah" which really makes it seem incredibly religious. You could use nearly any focusing crystal in a lightsaber, and Jedi would often choose a crystal that is sentimental or meaningful to them. There was little to no magic, and lightsabers were cheap and simple to construct. It was more that no one but a force-user could bring a laser-sword to a laser-gun fight and not die immediately.
I know I'm just not up with the times but I really loved old Star wars legends and how much emphasis it put on how these people who could use the force were normal people with exceptional abilities trying to interpret something much stranger and bigger than them (the force), and I feel like "kyber" crystals are a symptom of the very binary, new light vs. dark sequel canon which I find insanely reductive.
So uh yeah, I know I'm just old but it really bothers me.
P.S. Also isn't the word "Kyber" just them bastardizing "Kaiburr" crystals (which were supposed to be rare lightsaber crystals)? I was pretty sure this was always the case.
I generally agree, with some nitpicks.
The old canon several times mentions that wielding a lightsaber is actually extremely difficult and unintuitive...
...because the 'blade' is literally weightless, that alone would throw off a lot of wielders of more conventional swords...
... but also because the saber, potentially as a byproduct of the 'coherence field,'... produces strong, unituitive gryoscopic forces when moved or rotated at various angles and speeds.
...
The old explanation I remember is roughly that force sensitives essentially just intuitively know how to counteract this, to varying degrees of proficiency, but a non force sensitive, a non force user... they'd pick it up and awkwardly flail about with it as it seemingly gains and loses weight, is being pushed and pulled in crazy directions that make no sense compared to just, a physical sword or staff.
Sort of like trying to use a very, very poorly balanced real world melee weapon, but the weapon's poor balance also actively changes, like its center of gravity just seemingly randomly alters as you move it.
Basically, a non force user fights the weapon, whereas a skilled force user understands it, and in a more physically tangible sense, literally allows the weapon to guide their combat movements and style, they know when to go 'with' it and when to go 'against' it, to achieve the actual desired motion.
This is kind of sort of depicted in the Mandalorian, with the Darksaber seemingly becoming exhaustively heavy, massive, and Mando has to... learn how to use it, how to work with it.
And also: yes, Han uses a lightsaber in the OT, but most of the early expanded universe did just explain that by saying he is actually force sensitive, that his absurd luck and piloting skill in various situations does mean he is actually a untrained force user, he just also is a stubborn ass who thinks the Force is bullshit, at least initially, lol.
...
But anyway, yes, they used to make lightsabers out of a wider variety of crystals, not just 'kyber'... and yes, i also do remember many different variants of how 'kyber' was actually spelled.
For the life of me I thought its proper spelling was 'khyber' until i bothered to look it up in an actual wiki in the last couple of months.
That could be me misremembering, or maybe that was what I originally read decades ago now, or maybe what i am rembering got 'telephoned' through a bunch of people first, on some forum.
....Man now I kinda want to set up SWGEmu, hahahah!
It's fantasy, not sci-fi though
You can't stress that enough. I love sci-fi, but I never really fancied Star Wars.
Now, as a dad, I rewatch the movies and replay scenes with my son, and the similarity with fantasy action movies strikes me. For example, the beautiful display of alien species and habitats.
We don't need to split hairs - 'sci-fi fantasy' or 'science fantasy' is a real genre and common enough term.
I have always wished for a serious grown up version of Star Wars. Like not being afraid to sever limbs like they used to, or worrying about your scoundrels being too scoundrel-y. Also really taking an inventory of everything and seriously thinking about how it would interact.
Like to your point - no need to toss out the more magical force elements but maybe just tone it down a bit and ground them in reality a little better? Because it's absolutely ridiculous how they've become these invincible laser blocking demigods. They should be afraid to deploy, just like anyone, if there's going to be shooting. It's just lazy writing most of the time and it would be wonderful to see what a skilled hand could actually do with it all.
All they had to do for the Sequel Trilogy was adapt the Thrawn series.
...
Absolutely you do not have to be 100% faithful, absolutelty you can change some bits and bobs around, overemphasize a character's trait, underemphasize another, spend more or less run time developing certain people, relationships, etc.
Adjust and rewrite parts of it to make more sense with the old cast of actors being older than their characters were in the Thrawn series... and/or use all that fancy de-aging / re-voicing / face transplanting tech they have used all over the place with many of the same actual actors on other projects.
Its got new and old characters.
Its got Mara Jade, a new main female character, who is actually compelling and complex and fleshed out.
It respects the old characters, acknowledges their flaws and highlights their strengths. You actually see them face new struggles and have new failures in the actual temporal continuum of the plot... not as shoehorned momentary flashback/retcons to explain why someone is a completely different character now.
Its got more mature and serious themes and character arcs.
Its got an actually compelling main villain.
Its got a secret shadow fleet of ships... but with an actually competent explanation for them.
It got big ass space battles, and personal upfront altercations, its got strategizing and politics and intrigue.
It even ends on a victorious... but not a 'final' victorious note, leaving the gate open for you to really try and do your own thing from then after.
Its even already been functionally story boarded by being adapted into a comic book series.
...
But nope, we instead got a bunch of disrepectful hacks who were convinced they could outdo everything prior, cast it all aside initially, and then started trying to copy parts of it after they realized how badly they'd fucked up.
Fucking hacks.
And why the hell do the stormtroopers wear all that armor if one shot kills them?
The actual answer is that faceless pawns make better canon folder villains because it's less likely the audience will relate to them as actual people in the context of the narrative. The in-universe explanation is that faceless pawns are better foot soldiers for the empire because it's less likely said empire will relate to them as actual people.
Because it's cheap and looks scary. The Empire controls through fear and perceived power, not actual technological superiority. Stormtroopers primary job is to suppress dissent in civilian populations, they generally aren't fighting an opposing army.