this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
255 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

68526 readers
3160 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is 'nearly unavoidable' that AI will cause a financial crash within a decade, SEC head says::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Is it because replacing employees with AI results in a never-ending cascade where your stupid system doesn't keep consuming because AI don't consume and won't get paid?

Or is it because using AI will result in the climate to continually become more inhospitable?

Maybe it will be because AI will be used to create more and more believable misinformation that results in WW3?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 years ago (8 children)

OK, it is addressed in the article...

He's specifically talking about the use of AI in finance, and that an algorithm that runs amok in a particular sector:

in the after action reports people will say 'Aha! There was either one data aggregator or one model . . . we've relied on.' Maybe it's in the mortgage market. Maybe it's in some sector of the equity market

I'll throw out a microeconomic example. About a year into the pandemic, the price of used cars started going up... a LOT... in a short time. One of the reasons for the sudden changes in used car prices was that major used car resellers were using algorithms to set buying and selling prices for cars. While supply chain pressure on the new car market was unprecedented, and it trickled down to used cars, a facilitating cause is that the used car price-setting algorithms didn't really have any humans in the chain checking to see if the numbers they were kicking out made a lick of sense.

So you had companies like Carmax and Carvana buying used cars for $X, and then a month later 5X, then a month later 10X, because they were programmed to just up the offering price until they reached target stock levels. Sometimes they were buying 3+ year old used cars for more than the current price of NEW cars of similar trim level. Carvana's numbers got so whacked that it nearly sunk the company.

Now imagine that kind of a runaway algorithm in stocks, bonds, real estate, etc. It's 2008 all over again.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Gosh, maybe legalized gambling is not a good way to run an economy?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Honestly hoping something like this happens in residential real estate, if it isn’t happening already. Housing is well overdue for a correction.

You can’t tell me that most people can afford a $400,000-$700,000 mortgage. Median incomes don’t support that price point. Median household incomes might support the lower end…barely. So I am starting to wonder just who is buying/selling all these houses. When I see a $600,000 “average” house last 3 days on the market and then sell for $760,000…I have questions.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I traded in a 2014 Toyota hatchback to Carmax and got an Audi A3 when the algorithms went haywire. It didn’t cover the whole cost but it was a silly enough trade that I thought for sure someone would call me and say it was a computer error.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

While that's really interesting, there was a lot more at play than a pricing algorithm. It was a culmination of a lot of things, starting with Cash for Clunkers that had a huge impact on the used car market. Then there were a ton of supply chain issues during COVID that squeezed the new car market. Probably some other factors I'm not aware of, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Currently, I would rather guess it's the usual bubble popping. AI has attracted billions of investments and will likely pull in even more, but it's already foreseeable, that hardly any of the investments will turn a profit. So we'll end up with a third dotcom bubble.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes. Definitely one of those or something else entirely.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That’s an economist level reply right there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So do I collect my economic Bingo winnings after the 4th or 5th major crash of my adult lifetime?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You win the chance to afford to eat human or expired cat food you found on the body of someone you shot over a pair of worn boots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

I'm afraid your bingo winnings are going to be confiscated by the government in order to pay for more golden parachutes for the CEOs whose decisions led us here.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bears have predicted 100 of the last 3 market crashes

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

Yeah.

It's a casino, and a lot of these folks are no smarter than a retiree rubbing troll dolls on their favorite slot machine.

The solution is to realign markets to human needs. The is no productive benefit to high speed trading. There is no benefit to stock by backs. We need to reign in most of the nonsense that these financial services institutions do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The scapegoat for the next financial crash can't be put in prison. How convenient.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm optimistic we'll find a way to blame the poor. Just learn to code, and do rigorous statistics you ungrateful meatbag.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And then we finally eat the rich, right?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Sorry, the best we can do is a small marginal tax increase on income over $1M and a 50¢ bump to the minimum wage.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

Better spread out that wage increase over a reasonable period of time, like 10-25 years. Wouldn't want to burden the precious job creators out there.

/s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Fuck Gary Gensler. Dude tries to influence the market just to line his own pockets.

He should not be the head of the SEC.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Market manipulation? SEC should investigate him

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The crash is already in motion and it was not AI that caused it. This is just getting us ready for who to blame when it crashes.

Many stocks have been far oversold and there is no way to reset it without the rich losing it all.

This is how they will reset it and protect the rich.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this before or after it destroys the economy for everyone but the super rich by replacing them and making them compete for fewer and fewer scraps? Sorry, there will be lots more new jobs created by AI probably, like AI wrangler, AI safety consultant and the like. Probably.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

I always have a laughing fit whenever I see “Prompt engineer” used unironically in a job posting on LinkedIn.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I also think the term is granted way too much prestige, but a bit over a decade ago people also laughed at the notion of "Social Media Manager" being a real, high paying job

Who knows where this stuff will go

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Even today the term Social media manager is still conflated with graphic designer, sales representative, customer information management, publishing, copywriter, photographer and creative writing, all the time.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good, let it all collapse. I want to see the 1% shit themselves before climate change kills them.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago (11 children)

That's not who suffers most in financial collapse.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

Bingo. The super-rich love a financial collapse, it gives them a golden opportunity to turn disaster capitalist. All those foreclosed homes & businesses available at a knockdown price, nom nom nom.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I need to get off lemmy. Too many teenagers on here with their "burn it all down"s and "trust me, I have a super easy solution to a giant complex problem that has been plaguing humanity for generarions"s and "the bad guys are actually good guys, lol I'm so edgy"s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

now now, no need to be dismissive of other age groups in this matter. I'm sure there's plenty of non-teenager people that think the same way too. on the internet, nobody knows you're a 74 yr old extremist

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Is this suddenly a teenager platform whenever you want to infantilize the ones you disagree with?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure that crash is more the fault of the greedy shits who think it's normal for 4 folks to own 50% of the country while 50% owns 2% of the country. Don't need AI to tell you that system isn't sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

AI is just a convenient excuse and you know that.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lmao yeah. They need someone to blame for upcoming crash lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Heavy doubt on this one.

There is still so much misunderstanding on the state of AI and its potential based on current technology (spoiler: reduce your expectations significantly). How can you expect anyone to make predictions with such misunderstanding.

That said it kinda seems like a financial crash is already happening, regardless of AI.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's tech illiterate people being amazed by chat gpt and shit, not realizing just how janky and limited it's actual "artificial intelligence"actually is.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The SEC means: Security, and Exchange Commission. In case anybody like myself hates abbreviations, and have to look it up on Google to see what it even means

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

And? Is it something this person thinks we would avoid without AI? You would need a lot of faith that 'the market' won't dunk on itself some other way. What a non-statement..

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

then maybe they should do something about it.... its not like they do not have time...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Have you seen congress? We don't do that here....

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, a few communities I'm a part of have been warning about this since c. 2014, so I think he's actually correct in his prediction. I haven't read the article, but I don't think any solution he'd propose would be good regardless, so I think I'll just save my time. TLDR: failing a real leftist paradigm shift, we need global welfare like 5 to 10 years ago and UBI.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›