this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
83 points (91.9% liked)

3DPrinting

17384 readers
95 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why are 3D printers still stuck on stepper motors? Why haven't we transitioned to servo motors with encoder feedback for positioning?

Is it just too cost prohibitive for the consumer-level? We would be able to print a lot faster and more accurately if we had position feedback on the axes. Instead we just rely blindly on the stepper not skipping any steps when we tell it to move, hoping for the best.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Have you seen how fast printers with stepper motors can get? They print benchies in less than 3 minutes. The bottleneck is not the motion system, it's either the hot-end or the part cooling. Also stepper are super accurate and very flexible. Drivers are advanced and can tune for torque, speed, sound etc. Collision detection and skipped step detection is also a thing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not disputing, I want that 3 minute benchy. Where does one find this magic?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The print as absolute shit though. Literal garbage.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Looks pretty good for the speed to me! This is an experiment. Someone will be able to build on that and make it better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

https://youtu.be/f5OHYZbrHjs?si=LruE_T63UnlSRWa0

This is as fast as I've seen for PLA while still retaining good quality. And he probably could go faster with more powerful motors or more of them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, there’s going to be a hard peak to how fast a 3D printer can go, because physics. Unless we start running prints in a vacuum and start tuning local gravity….

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There will always be limits to how fast you can go. But as long as the average printer is not even close to whats doable there is room for improvement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That’s much much nicer. I’ve been looking at the bamboo x1c, its speed and quality is pretty amazing right out the box.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/f5OHYZbrHjs?si=LruE_T63UnlSRWa0

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Speed Benchys mostly are garbage quality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is mostly a cooling issue. Not being able to solidify the plastic fast enough after it's been deposited.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/IRUQBTPgon4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah does anyone have a link to a 3 min bench print?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3 minute benchy

It's custom made printers and it makes shitty prints.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRUQBTPgon4

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=IRUQBTPgon4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stepper motors are considerably easier to lock in a single location than continuous rotation servos. When they are commanded to a certain position they will STAY THERE. This makes precise positioning considerably easier vs a continuous rotation servo, which must use a sensor feedback loop to ensure it stays close to where it needs to be. And any feedback loop will involve small amounts of extremely undesirable oscillation and movement about the target point...

besides. we can already drive steppers significantly faster than any hot end can melt plastic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well, that's why you use a proper servo drive. Yes, technically they oscillate at standstill, but it's so little it literally does not matter. Closed loop servo control is a solved problem unless you're trying to implement it yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah the big issues with servos would be that even with very good controllers you'd end up having to constantly bump to the corner 0s just to ensure you got the right location. Stepper motors can be relied upon to hold the position.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Cost is the short version, yes.

I don't know what kind of servos everyone here is talking about that are less precise than open loop steppers. Low quality hobbyist stuff, I guess? Proper servo motors & drives are the standard for good reason for robotics, industrial CNC machines, and pretty much everything else that needs powerful motors with high precision. Much higher power density, higher RPM (good for increasing torque with a gearbox), equivalent or better precision, plus closed loop control is a huge capability and safety gain.

That said, good, industrial quality servo motors are 1) expensive and 2) aren't made in small enough sizes to be comparable to the steppers on most 3D printers. Even the smallest industrial servo + drive I've seen is about 5x as big as the steppers on a personal 3D printer and costs $800ish. Obviously, both are deal breakers for a personal 3D printer.

3D printers are a fairly ideal application for steppers. The moving parts are small and light, meaning you both don't need a large motor and the danger of slippage is lower. Plus, steppers are cheap.

load more comments
view more: next ›