this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
499 points (93.8% liked)

politics

23594 readers
3239 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 245 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Must be nice to be able to have a tantrum in court, yell at the judge, and then just be able to walk out.

I encourage everyone to try it sometime.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I encourage everyone to try it sometime.

Do fries come with that Contempt?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Freedom to be in jail fries.

*jail depends on tax bracket

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Terms and conditions: Offer valid only for white or orange. Participant must be a republican or identify themselves as a republican. Offer not valid for women, children, and people of color other than orange, and poor. Don’t be poor.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

He might be one of half a dozen people who could get away with that in a US federal court.

I wonder if Elon could get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Florida man tackled by bailiff?

[–] [email protected] 142 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Justice Engoron, in a plea to Trump's attorney, Chris Kise, implored, “Mr. Kise, please control your client.” However, the attempt to rein in Trump proved futile as he continued his tirade, even bringing up the prosecutor's alleged political motives, including what he called her "failed" run for Governor.

Should have charged him with contempt.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Disobeyed Judges orders so hes gonna be held in contempt right? Were not going to keep reinforcing to this child that he doesn't get any consequences right? . . . right? The US Justice system is doing this to itself, and every day it proves itself inadequate to contain this threat.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree that they're doing it to themselves, but it's not that it's inadequate. It's that they aren't treating him like a mob boss. They are presuming he has a shred of human decency and isn't a psychopathic narcissist ready to burn it all down out of pettiness and spite.

They've prosecuted mob bosses before, so they simply need to change their paradigm.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

A normal person would've been tackled by the bailiff by now.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He should have been arrested, cuffed, and hauled off to be locked up like anyone else.

Instead everyone will continue to coddle him, emboldening his jackass followers as if this course is somehow favorable to consequences.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is this a thing?? I don't get it. It's so stupid. Anybody else would get their ass handed back to them but he's the exception for some reason I can't fathom. Like, even if he has a lot of followers, so what?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In this case, to give absolutely zero room for mistrial complaints that the judge was biased against him.

And guess what? He has zero room for complaints. The judge has handled this pretty much perfectly.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Baby Hands is such a snowflake

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Snowflakes are actually cool. He's a fucking chud.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is he not sitting in a cell for contempt of court?

The judge is setting a bad precedent that is going to be used every single time he tries to hold anyone else in contempt ever again.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think this is a case of "I know you're going to appeal and say I was bias. They're going to look at how much I let you do and get away with and laugh in your face." I think she's playing the long game.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not going to pretend that this is some grand strategy by Trump. He's an immature man-child and that's all there is to it.

But there most certainly is a strategy by his lawyers.

If their client somehow manages to make the judge "lose their cool" its fuel for an appeal/mistrial. So they really have no interest in ACTUALLY controlling his outbursts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

This title is hilarious compared to others I’ve seen. Makes it seem like shit was crazy. Like they’re trying to top the guy who superman’d over the bench last week. It wasn’t. He spoke and the judge let him. And the judge will make his decision soon so let’s see how the EXPLOSIVE UNHINGED ATTACKS work out for him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah I was going to say, "stormed out"? I've never seen a courtroom where the defendant could just leave, especially not in a case that's this high profile.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Snowflake behavior ❄️👶

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

When you're famous, they just let you do it.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago

Definitely the actions of an innocent man. Lmao he's such a loser, and sore one at that. Hopefully they bleed his criminal organization dry with the verdict

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did anyone expect something different? He is a big child that never learned the meaning of tbe word "No". He simply cannot accept that someome sets real limits to his doings, so they must be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

He has Narcissistic Personality Disorder. I can't imagine why this isn't called out more.

Everything the man does is perfectly predictable (note the date!) given that context.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

He stormed out because he shit himself. Again. And was stinking up the courtroom. Again. If you watch the video, you see him holding his butt and waddling.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're gonna make me look it up myself?!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would encourage you to just take my word for it, in this instance...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Don't be so hard on the guy. He just needed a diaper change. Happens all the time to babies.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Call your Senators and Congressmen and tell them this shit is unacceptable. Call over and over until their aides are sick of hearing your voice. Even if you aren't in the same party and you didn't vote for them. Let every gov't employee know enough is enough.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does this petulant child keep getting away with shit?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope they slap him with contempt again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I hope this is used as precedent by so many people to have tantrums in court and walk the fuck out. and that all of legal history looks back on this judge for causing this with his desire to let trump do whatever the fuck he wants without significant, meaningful repercussion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Justice Engoron, in a plea to Trump's attorney, Chris Kise, implored, “Mr. Kise, please control your client.” However, the attempt to rein in Trump proved futile as he continued his tirade, even bringing up the prosecutor's alleged political motives, including what he called her "failed" run for Governor.

lmfao and the attorney will probably never get paid. God what those meetings must be like…

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Kise has already been paid to the tune of $3M.

No attorneys will work for Donald Trump without a huge retainer up front.

Good attorneys will not work for him at all.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

I wish the judge had simply replied “would you like cheese with whine?” and then locked him for contempt of court.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

careful now, drumpf. that hamburder heart might just do the world a favour...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since when is the client allowed to deliver a closing statement anyways

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Sounds like someone needed some Baby Shark and a snack. Poor kid.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Damn did my ex-girlfriend write this headline?

load more comments
view more: next ›