this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
1303 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

6770 readers
1737 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BlueSky Post.

Transcript.If you tell someone to “Google it” at this point you’re telling them to look up five ads and some AI-generated bs instead of the actual thing they want to know.

old guy takes long hit on the bong

“Back in my day, search engines used to find things besides the wreckage of late-stage capitalism.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 130 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Google was a "disrupter"

Which means they burnt investor money for years to deliver a great product while not making any profit.

Once they gain market share and are the default, enshitification begins and people eventually wonder why they're still using it.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haven’t used Google in months and haven’t felt any loss in my quality of life. Protonmail and DuckDuckGo, easy peasy

[–] odium@programming.dev 36 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The one Google product that I still use is Google maps. Openstreetmaps just isn't as good in my area and only Google maps, Waze, and Apple maps have accurate traffic data here.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

Also for the uninformed Google owns Waze.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't stop using that and Google photos. Instant backup of all photos, and more importantly, great search. It even recognizes my two dogs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Liz@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

I'm working on improving Open Street Maps wherever I can, but I'm only one person. Every few weeks or so I'll login and add or fix something. Slowly but surely!

[–] knolord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While live traffic might be a hurdle (even though Magic Earth, despite not being FOSS, has good enough data, at least for me), why not contribute to OSM yourself?

[–] odium@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I do have street complete and contribute for my neighborhood, but there just aren't enough other ppl nearby contributing to be useable. There are a lot of missing roads in my town.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago

The search engine wasn't disruptive in the sense that it was subsidized, it was disruptive in the sense that it didn't try to be the portal to everything in the internet (as opposed to, say, Yahoo) but offered a clean page.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Except that I wouldn't use Google Search as an example of enshittification.

It isn't like Google tried to break search to increase profits. Instead, the industry around Google changed to adapt to Google's search algorithms.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, they most certainly broke it. Instead of just searching for what you type in, it now "interprets" your query and the interpretation is always whatever has more ads. If you switch to Verbatim mode, the results are noticeably better.

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can switch to verbatim mode?

[–] OldGreyTroll@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Tools -> dropdown "All results" and select "Verbatim"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They absolutely did break it. Without even getting into all of the convoluted shenanigans they pull now, their advanced search operators are dog shit now. They completely ignore negative search terms whenever they have a bunch of ads to show you with that term, or when there's an abundance of agenda-rich propaganda articles with that term. They're fucking poopoopcacca now.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It also sucks that all information is now hidden away in a youtube tutorial or on a reddit thread full of dead links and deleted comments. I don't want to watch your shit YouTube video, I never did.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right? I never understood why people would rather watch some over sensationalized YouTube video that is full of fluff, rather than just quickly reading an article. I can get information I need from an article before a YouTuber even finishes their stupid intro. I guess the average person is pretty bad at reading.

[–] assembly@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wonder if there is a new term to use to target secondary or tertiary entshittification. I mean Google did participate in entshittification with the increase in ads but they are also a big victim of the same entshittification. Like maybe the entshittification is rolling downhill.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

some call it capitalism. cash is king.

[–] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really true.

Googles stance on protecting net neutrality totally changed over the years with the cell phone internet browsing, and them getting in bed with Verizon. Google=Verizon

Obama fought off the end of net neutrality his entire presidency.

Now they have a large financial reasonability to direct you to specific content and companies

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/net-neutrality-is-ending-heres-how-your-internet-use-could-change

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not defending Google itself, just noting that the declining quality of its search is based less on a malicious decision on Google's part and more a result of SEO.

[–] DoYouNot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, the 5+ ads that Google serves at the top before real results are not the result of SEO. It's a problem sure, but don't take the credit away from Google. They worked hard to make sure you see those ads.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like they did break search to profit, though possibly through inaction. It doesn't feel like they're even trying to deliver good content over seo garbage anymore.

Hard to distinguish malice from incompetence with Google, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

PageRank was a huge deal, and drastically increased the quality of the results over previous approaches. They absolutely disrupted search.

Google was founded in 1998. AdWords came out in 2000 and the company had its first profitable quarter in 2001. Three years isn't bad to build a tech company that can turn a profit.

They are an ad company first and foremost. Search, Android, Chromebooks, browsers and Cloud hosting all just feed their machine.

[–] Tvkan@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Butterfly meme:

Literally everything bad vaguely related to tech

Lemmy users: "Is this enshittification?"

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's an example of Lemmy complaining about something you would say isn't enshittification, but the Lemmy users do say is enshittification?

[–] Tvkan@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. Google is losing the fight against SEO (and now AI), they're not intentionally giving you bad search results. Bing, DDG, etc. are all facing the same struggles.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Enshittification isn't when companies make their products worse on purpose, for the sake of making it worse. The goal isn't to get worse, the goal is to maintain competitive force and increase profit margins by way of strategically "optimizing" previously good products to squeeze ever more profit.

The mere fact that AI and SEO are ruining these search engines is a product of the profit-motive and markets functioning "properly."

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

More that SEO won.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My favorite is googling something, the first result is a reddit post asking the exact question I need answered. There is only one reply telling the OP that they could easily Google it instead of asking on Reddit.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I used to necro those old posts by replying "this is what your fucking bullshit response gets us. I googled it and ended up here reading your arrogant response instead of finding an answer."

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your service.

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"if you can believe it, at one point there were no search engines, and if you wanted to know what was out there you had to get a big book that listed all the websites."

*gasp!

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Proud owner of "The Internet Yellow Pages" here. I wonder if I still have my copy in storage.

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Back in my day if you Googled failure the Whitehouse.gov webpage about George W. Bush would appear.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I remember when whitehouse.com was a porn site

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lord_ToRA@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're not using adblock, you're doing it wrong anyway.

[–] Misconduct@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That doesn't really help much with all the ass tier search results that are just the same terribly written/uninformative article being regurgitated :(

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Back in my day, we had to hit Borders, Barnes & Noble, or Books-A-Million to find tech books to help us figure out what to do. Dot-com cubicle shelves always had a mini library.

O'Reilly made so much money.

[–] Wollang@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh Borders, how I miss you

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I like Schengen too

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

They're going to use the year chatGPT came out as an equivalent to how 1945 is used to calibrate radiometric tests. These days I don't trust any search result published 2022, as 95% of those first page results are ai generated garbage.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I Bing stuff and like to Edge so hard at work, that I dont even miss Google.

load more comments