this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
394 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22786 readers
3098 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Are they seriously trying to paint the mass production of AI powered war drones, while hinting they’d be useful in war against China, as a good thing?!

Político is written my actual morons.

[–] sab@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not "they", but Paul McLeary, the Politico defence reporter. Each point on the list is essentially an opinion piece by one of their journalists.

And it's not necessarily saying it's a good thing: It's a thing you might have missed. You could also question whether "the U.S. is producing more oil than anytime in history" is supposed to be a good thing.

Furthermore, as to McLeary's point: Some - such as anyone in the region except the Chinese - might argue it's important that the influence of China in the South China Sea is balanced out by other powerful players. It's not about going to war with China, it's about the continued independence of Taiwan and other fairly fragile balances in the region. It doesn't take a moron to see that the situation is complex.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it's not necessarily saying it's a good thing

Did you actually read the article? They very clearly say it would be a major win for Biden.

[–] sab@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Tech firms and lawmakers still want more specifics on how this is all supposed to work. But if things go as planned, the success of the program would be a major win for the White House, which has been eager to display American technological and industrial might.

So, if it goes according to plan and is a success, it would be a major political victory for the White House/Biden in terms of their eagerness to "display American technological and industrial might".

It's something they want to do, and which if this goes as planned, they will manage to do it. Hence, in politics, a "win". This is different from passing normative judgment as to whether or not it's a good thing: It's a win in the same sense destroying the Supreme Court was a "win" for the previous White House.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just morons, paid DNC shills.

Granted, there's a lot of overlap, including on Politico.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Given that many independent voters were Republicans and conservatives love war, this is a positive. It demonstrates that Biden isn't lax on national security and has an eye on the future when his Republican critics constantly attack him over the subject. Democrats will vote for Joe over Trump, but independents and waffling Republicans are in play.

[–] 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pandora's AI war drone box has pretty much been opened so might as well get ahead of the curve. More important than the utility in an actual war is the function of weapons as a deterrent to show that it's not worth fighting a war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you believe we need to have the best technology to defend ourselves, and potential rivals are already pursuing this, yes. US has always tried to stay ahead in technology and this is no different than the latest stealth fighter, or vtol, or aircraft carrier or tank or missile or satellite or submarine or secure communications or radar system or even the best airlift or inflight refueling. The first wave of drone development was a huge success, as was what we were able to send Ukraine. Why wouldn’t we apply the same strategy to a new wave of same technology, and be mostly genuine in saying this will save American and allied lives?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a fan, for one. Fuck China. Fuck Russia.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Respectfully - with that attitude, we'll never be at peace.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Expanded overtime guarantees for millions

First over-the-counter birth control pill to hit U.S. stores in 2024

Making airlines pay up when flights are delayed or canceled

Gun violence prevention and gun safety get a boost

Renewable power is the No. 2 source of electricity in the U.S. — and climbing

Preventing discriminatory mortgage lending

A sweeping crackdown on “junk fees” and overdraft charges

Forcing Chinese companies to open their books

Preventing another Jan. 6

Building armies of drones to counter China

The nation’s farms get big bucks to go “climate-smart”

Biden scraps Trump’s paint scheme for Air Force One (not sure this is worthy)

The Biden administration helps broker a deal to save the Colorado River

Giving smaller food producers a boost

Biden recommends loosening federal restrictions on marijuana

A penalty for college programs that trap students in debt

Biden moves to bring microchip production home

Tech firms face new international restrictions on data and privacy

Preventing a cobalt crisis in Congo

Cracking down on cyberattacks

Countering China with a new alliance between Japan and South Korea

Reinvigorating cancer research to lower death rates

Making medication more accessible through telemedicine

Union-busting gets riskier

Biden inks blueprint to fix 5G chaos

Biden empowers federal agencies to monitor AI

Fixing bridges, building tunnels and expanding broadband

The U.S. is producing more oil than anytime in history

Strengthening military ties to Asian allies

A new agency to investigate cyberattacks

And I will add a few of my own:

Creating a new 15% minimum corporate tax rate

Creating the most new jobs in any 4 year period of American history.

Ending inflation without starting a recession

Reducing student loan debt

Expert handling of Putin

Ending Covid without telling people to drink bleach

[–] UmeU@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ending inflation without starting a recession is probably the most impactful on this list.

A few years ago when Covid shut down the economy and the fed printed trillions to keep the whole system from collapsing, I would have bet anything that a major recession was just around the corner.

The ‘soft landing’ was one of the most significant challenges our country/the world has ever faced.

Obviously not completely attributable to Biden, but his leadership during this time allowed us to come out of Covid stronger than we were before it started. The whole world was at risk of the dollar collapsing and it was a super close call.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No one will ever remember it. That's what government should be like. Inflation was guaranteed, now we just need to see them start hitting companies for over charging. So step 1 is getting congress to write a bill saying over charging for a product is illegal. The question is how much is to much... So we will likely never get legislation. Maybe start with saying food cannot be resold at a cost higher than 3%. It will start bringing food costs down, and we can fix Desantis's stupid bill and change it from Chinese and make it so no one who does not live in the U.S. can buy multiple properties and companies cannot buy properties in residential areas. Then we might see housing stabilize or drop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

"The U.S. is producing more oil than anytime in history"

The point is meant for the republican readers :P

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd love to see one of these articles where the list isn't padded with non-accomplishments like painting the fucking plane, or giving Biden credit for starting preliminary inquiries into thinking about doing something like with cannabis legalization, or things that he should be ashamed of, like producing more oil than at any time in history.

[–] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

In the good ol' US of A? Good luck.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Renewable energy as #2 source of energy.

As opposed to what? Non-renewables?

Is there even a #3?

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The article says:

Electricity generation from renewable energy sources — including wind, solar and hydropower — surpassed coal-fired generation in the electric power sector for the first time in 2022, making it the second-biggest source behind natural gas generation. Renewables also passed nuclear power generation for the first time in 2021 and widened that gap the next year.

So at least it's

  1. Fossil Gas
  2. Renewables
  3. Coal
  4. Nuclear
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] digeridoo@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I've searched (not researched) a little bit and it appears that the categories that they may be referring to are petroleum products, coal, nuclear, and then renewables.

[–] Donger@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] aniki@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Anything but fix real problems.

I don't give a fuck about the paint on a fucking airplane

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd say you didn't read the article, but the Air Force One paint is smack in the middle of the article with 29 other things that actually do fix real problems.

[–] sab@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, whoever reads the article would also see that they did a similar piece on Trump, listing both positive and negative achievements of his presidency.

I think it's a cool format. The media cycle tends to blow one single story out of proportions while neglecting anything else that happens, this is (imo) a good way to review some of what's been happening the last four years.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Drones for China doesn't fix healthcare.

Downvotes wont fix income inequality, chuds, just like Biden.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Biden can't unilaterally fix healthcare. He would need congress to cooperate with him and he has never been able to get that. He couldn't even pass the bills he wanted that did pass without major changes.

It amazes me what people think presidents have the power to do. They're not absolute monarchs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about border security? Oh, Republicans torched that because Big Cheeto told them to? Must be Bifen's fault!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Putting mushrooms on a hamburger won't fix housing affordability, but that doesn't mean it's a bad idea

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago
[–] xlash123@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd love to see a bigger focus on creating better public mass transit systems instead of focusing on producing more oil for cars. Cheaper gas addresses the symptom, not the cause.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Careful…. This will upset the kids.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ooh. Preemptive deployment of the most common centrist thought-terminating cliche.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

How do you not bore yourself with this drivel?

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why would anyone be upset that Biden issued an executive order to start the process of legalizing weed? Or that renewable power is now the number 2 source of electricity in the country?

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Because here on lemmy, the kids like to ignore everything good something is in favor of the one or two bad things and then elevate that to ridiculous levels.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Because "US Bad" is the fundamental thought process of a lot of lemmings

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Digital_Prophet@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Jesus christ, Politico.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (34 children)

Condoned and funded genocide should be the red line for everyone.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (28 children)

So you refuse to buy anything from China because of the Uighurs, right?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"How to derail a tankie" rofl

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't mean to be an ass regarding these because a lot of them are really nice but, none of them aside from the broadband expansion and maybe the funding for election transition/process really seem to help the current day millennial or Gen Z, the closest might be his environmental policies, I feel he should start focusing on thr younger groups if he wants to keep regained support for the newer gens.

That being said I did learn quite a bit from this article because I wasn't aware he did most of what was listed here so it is cool

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments