this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
443 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68495 readers
3716 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shell Is Immediately Closing All Of Its California Hydrogen Stations | The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can't make its operations work here.::The oil giant is one of the big players in hydrogen globally, but even it can't make its operations work here. All seven of its California stations will close immediately.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Looking forward to the upcoming Toyota announcement that they believe in the future of hydrogen more than ever

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Toyota, and Japan as a whole, are in a tricky situation with their electric grid. It's been developed separately by nine different companies in each region; the southern regions use 60 Hz supply cycles, where-as the northern regions (including Tokyo Electric) use 50 Hz. Add to this the populations reluctance for nuclear power after Fukushima, and you get a very fragile supply grid with limited capacity. Toyota is gunning hard for Hydrogen because Japan itself can't support EVs and for some reason it doesn't want to/can't manufacture both.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (39 children)

Okay, but if they don't have the electricity for EVs they definitely don't have enough electricity to waste 2/3 of it turning it into hydrogen and back.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Over 75% of Japanese energy is imported under current circumstances and they have a reluctance to use geothermal for social and economic reasons. Wind is another good choice but they're restricted in where they can deploy it by social and economic concerns

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I’m not sure I buy that. Yes, their electrical grid is a mismatched nightmare, that they should have taken the hit on decades ago. However I see that small chargers for things like phones can adjust to pretty much any electrical grid: why shouldn’t we expect the charger in the car to be equally flexible? Either way, it’s converting to DC

Edit: the article didn’t talk about the differences, except frequency: if the only difference is 50Hz vs 60Hz, most analog electrical stuff probably also works on both. The real problem is they don’t have interconnects nor do they have a regulatory structure allowing separate generating oroviders

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

My main point was about capacity, and how the separate grid(s?) hinder attempts to add the capacity needed for EVs. I wasn't really clear on that though. mb

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They also recently announced an anhydrous ammonia engine.

They really really don’t want to do an electric car. Anhydrous ammonia is insanely toxic. You ever spill a like a few drops of gas at the pump and get it on your pants or shoe? Annoying but not a big deal. Do that with anhydrous ammonia and you’ll be in the hospital.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 130 points 1 year ago (9 children)

As two major manufacturers double down on developing hydrogen cell cars.

The complaints about electric infrastructure not being ready for widespread adoption but people championing hydrogen cell just boggles my mind.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

What, you don't see how great it is to have two separate sets of infrastructure with little overlap in order to have a less efficient solution pushed by the oil industry?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (25 children)

What part of that confuses you? Hydrogen is better for cars VS batteries in every meaningful way in 2024. Long range, quick fill ups, zero harmful emissions, don't need to live in SFH or rely on landlord/HOA to grant you the privilege of charging your car.

Hydrogen cell cars are electric cars that don't rely on severely underdeveloped technology of batteries we have today.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (21 children)

And where are you gonna get the hydrogen from? You have any idea how power inefficient electrolysis is!?

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

You're mostly right. But I don't agree on the last part. Hydrogen production can't be done in your backyard. But electricity can (and I forgive you if have no backyard, these next few points may be less relevant if that is the case).

Unlike hydrogen, electricity production is affordable, scalable, and ubiquitous. And that small detail changes the benefits dramatically.

  • The idea of being your own gas station, from the grid, or from your own solar, is really compelling. No one likes being at the mercy of fluctuating energy prices, or, as in this case, unreliable and scarce availability of fuel.
  • Many people don't like going to gas stations (e.g. women and personal safety). Totally doable outside of road trips.
  • If you are generating your own electricity you will need batteries anyway. Might as well put wheels on them: two birds one stone.
  • Even if you don't generate your own power, you still want power security during outage. Since the battery is on wheels, you can drive it to a place that does have power to top up.

Again, I can see that these are less compelling points if you live in a super dense area and utilities and supply chain there are really dependable. But this is hardly the case everywhere.

And then there's the build of the car itself. Honestly, I know nothing about it, but something tells me the simplicity of battery and electric motors makes those cars more practical to build, especially if the battery itself is commoditized as part of a complete electric grid solution.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Yes! A clean platform that needs METRIC GIGATONS of carbon positive infrastructure to set up and maintain. That is why I call shenanigans on your zero harmful emissions claim.

VS

We already have wires, and batteries are more than good enough for a vast swath of the everyday commuting public.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait what? How in the fuck could an HOA prevent you from charging your car or installing a charger inside your space? The charger lives inside your garage, so it doesn't effect curbside appearance and isn't within what they can control.

At absolute worst, if you have no garage and street parking, wouldn't you just be running the cord over to your vehicle? Non-commercial charging stations aren't normally weather proof, so that wouldn't be outside, and again, none of their business. If they have an issue with an extension cord running across your lawn, or a cable slightly larger than a hose, then they'd have to make sane rules about how long it can be left out, like not just leaving it plugged in for a whole weekend straight. Otherwise they're making it against the rules for people to use corded yard equipment or use a hose.

I might be missing something here, but I don't see any way an HOA could do anything against it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I got the infrastructure argument when EV battery range sucked and charge times took hours. But now that EV range is getting close to gasoline cars, and charging can be done in minutes with a super charger, hydrogen doesn’t make much sense.

It could’ve been dope if only a company like Toyota made some desirable cars and built out a great station network.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hydrogen will have an important role to play in the future of green energy simply because it's a portable high density fuel, that doesn't require a battery to work.

The trade-off is that hydrogen takes more energy to create, then you get back. That doesn't make a lot of sense when you're using fossil fuels, but it would in a future with significant amounts of excess green energy e.g. wind, solar, fusion, etc.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but hydrogen fuel cell vehicles do have batteries. You can't put energy captured from regen braking back into the fuel cell, so either you have a battery or you lose a third of your range.

Fuel cell EVs can't be fitted with charging plugs for religious reasons.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuel cell EVs can't be fitted with charging plugs for religious reasons

I really need to hear that story.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

Yes, they can. They just don’t want to.

It’s not hard to see what’s happening here: a company that is almost solely based upon selling petroleum-based fuel put down a few hydrogen stations, then gave up, stating “it’s just not feasible! Look, we tried! Looks like fossil fuels are the future! Oh well, tee hee!”

Very weak tea indeed.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Did they stop subsidizing Shells greenwashing?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

All of that coping and seething Toyota's CEO has been doing about electric cars sure does look stupid right now.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So what I'm hearing is, if I build my own electrolysis station driven by a solar panel array, there's quickly going to be a glut of extremely cheap hydrogen cars coming out of So.Cal....

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what I’m hearing is, if I build my own electrolysis station driven by a solar panel array, there’s quickly going to be a glut of extremely cheap hydrogen cars coming out of So.Cal…

That's the fun thing - after you make the hydrogen you have to compress it to 10,000 PSI and cool it to -40 to actually get it into the car. And make sure the pumps, pipes and cooling gear are all made of materials that won't be destroyed by exposure to high pressure hydrogen.

It'd probably be a lot cheaper and easier to gut the car and replace the fuel cell and tanks with batteries and a charger.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've never done any of my projects because they were cheap or good. I understand how to do proper engineering considering I have a couple years of experience, and understand what I don't know and the fact that it's dangerous.

fuck it, we ball

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I mean, how many people bought them even there? Isnt there like, one model that anyone has even tried to sell to the public, just from toyota stubbornly insisting that EVs wont work despite all the working EVs that already exist?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

You have to build something they can handle 600 bar / 10.000 PSI. You don't want to be standing close for your first test.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Didn't they just do this to cloud the conversation on alternative fuels and the tech was never really viable? And to like, divert investment that could have otherwise gone to other more promising green technologies?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wonder if Toyota will take back all those Mirais that will be stranded on the side of the road otherwise?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

~~Hydrogen~~ Natural Gas

ftfy.

load more comments
view more: next ›