this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
437 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39860 readers
1740 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

for many years now – stopped using them back when they started to ignore +include, -exclude, and "phrases"

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

It was a necessary move to incorporate support for Google+ profiles. /s

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So wait, the search operators don't work anymore? It seemed like it but is that confirmed?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They still work as intended actually, but most pages are so inundated with SEO garble that they’re effectively useless

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

And if it limits the results too much they just ignore them to cram more ads in.

Can’t have the bottom of the page spelling gogle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They still work but they search the entire page, not just what's visible in your browser. A search for "term" does not implicate you being able to find term on the results' rendered pages.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Google is no longer a search engine.

It's a storefront.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I live in central Canada.

I am reading the comments, and I am noticing that other people's experiences are very different than mine.

For me, Google Search has reached the point where it will not even give me results for my search terms. I say this without an iota of hyperbole.

It's so coincidental that this conversation comes up, but I actually sat there yesterday agog, looking at my desktop Firefox browser window... Scrolling through the entire search results page and realizing that not a single thing was even close to what I searched

It is noteworthy because I have been observing a steady decline, but it was the very first time I could make use of literally nothing that they gave back. In an unsettling way, the gravity of it hit me emotionally right there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

imo deserved for being a Saskatchewaner. Can't be helped

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't associate ME with those banjo-pickin' inbreds.

edit: I had referred to the people of Saskatchewan as a bunch of banjo-pickin’ inbreds. I was wrong to make such a statement, and I’d like to apologize. The vast majority of the people in Saskatchewan have no idea how to play the banjo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ars had an article about it: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/01/google-search-is-losing-the-fight-with-seo-spam-study-says/

It's not just you—Google Search is getting worse. A new study from Leipzig University, Bauhaus-University Weimar, and the Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence looked at Google search quality for a year and found the company is losing the war against SEO (Search Engine Optimization) spam.

They're also not particularly motivated to try harder. They don't have a lot of competition, and they make a lot of money this way. And their leadership are idiots.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

They also can't. The algorithm is a black box to them, so figuring out why a given SEO tactic works is a fool's errand.

It's a cat and mouse game, where a working tactic will rapidly proliferate.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google search was so legendary when it came out, it was able to find me perfect results when I would even type in almost gibberish, it somehow predicted what I actually meant. Over time the results were worse and worse, then nothing but products would show in the results a few years ago. Buy this, buy what,etc. no more research, just trash products in the search results. Google greed killed itself.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Search Engine became a small part of Googles operations, and then Google became a small part of Alphabets operations.

Turns out advertising is where the money is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I don't say this to be dismissive, but Google's search results have been getting worse for the better part of a decade now, and they're still far above anyone else. While I do think that engines like Bing are closer to Google's quality than most give them credit for, Google is still the only game in town. There are other search engines that people use, but they are niches in niches, and are probably used for belief reasons over an improvement in quality.

Frankly, I think that for the first time in history, the search market is open for competition. There is an argument to be made whether Google either doesn't care about their search quality, or that it's simply a hard problem to solve for anyone. If the former is true, then a competitor could make a very real case for overthrowing Google, given the right backing and hype behind them.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The rate at which the results got worse has a notable pattern in line with their drive for ad revenue. Most of the results are garbage because they are driven by money rather than user choice and popularity. The more money you pour into tuning SEO and Google Ads the higher you rank. To hell with relevance or what users actually want.

I ran a web community for writers from 1997 onward, and threw in the towel this year. The site had a core following but we relied on a steady trickle of new users from organic search and word of mouth to stay afloat. And little by little no matter how much time I put into SEO and the site we continued to slide due to a combination of seo rank and google just removing pages without explanation or reason. After spending the last 5 years rebuilding the site for SEO and mobile optimization, I watched google index 99% of the sitemap, our rank come back up slightly, new users starting to come in... And then it just... Stopped. I went to check the indexing, and google had silently moved all the indexed pages back to "crawled but not indexed" for no bloody reason. Zero errors, codes or messages.

I threw in the towel. The site was costing me nearly $500usd a month to operate and I could not throw a dime at ads. I had tried getting ad revenue on the site a few years back even though I did not want ads on the site and it looked promising... I got 90% of the way to covering monthly costs, but before the first cheque was cut google banned me from that service with no explanation. I followed every rule, discouraged regular members from clicking ads unless they really wanted to see the thing the ad was showing. Still got banned. And google just doesn't even care to explain themselves.

I closed the site in January because I realized the internet I fell in love with, the one I created that community for... Its dead. Killed by capitalism.

Might be for the best. I can throw my coding time at open-source projects now. Just need to find one that entices me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Yes. If you do a search on this site for posts about google, you'll find multiple threads about this. Basically it seems that google is losing the arms race against SEO, and new LLM bots are mostly responsible.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, the first measurements are rolling in and not looking great: https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/17/google_search_results_spam/

Basically, imagine someone built a machine that made it trivial to generate an infinite number of realistic-looking articles (=LLMs). And there's a monetary incentive to do so (=ad money).
So, I have to imagine, all search engines are absolutely being blasted with spam content, and they have to filter out realistic-looking articles to make their search results worthwhile at all, but as a result, some real search results will also get filtered out or ranked badly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Also, google images sucks now. Try googling for anything specific, like "sand in pc" or "red carb on plate" - all AI generated

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yes. I'm using the same search methods I've always used that used to get me relevant results, and I get a bunch of fucking sponsored links instead. I've noticed lately that if the result of a search is a YouTube video and I click on it, it doesn't go to YouTube but opens up as a search result and plays me ads somehow bypassing my adblocker that works just fine in actual YouTube. More than once after the ad was done, the video refused to load, which was utterly infuriating.

Google assistant on my phone has also become garbage. They changed the functionality of the few key things I liked to use, and now it's totally useless to me. Google is swirling down the shitter faster than yesterdays tacos. Honestly, if it wasn't for email, photos, and using an Android phone, I'd probably be done with them entirely.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Use Ublock Origin to block all ads. Takes 20 seconds to install, and works on all browsers

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

The entire internet has drastically declined for me.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not just Google. Duck duck go was good for awhile but now also getting worse. Assume this is Ai and other tools screwing with how their web crawlers collect data. Expect it to get worse before it gets better.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

DDG recently started to exclude terms from my search query and returns more random garbage and a "search only ..." link. So often I search, find nothing, then realize DDG messed up again. Really not sure why it's doing that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

On the flipside for advertisers, prices for ad clicks have never been higher. Its so outrageously high now, making Google such an obscene amount of money, that its unlikely to get better, I'd expect it to get much worse.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Yea, turns out that without competition companies are lazy as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they've been getting progressively less useful. UBlock Origin helps but I feel like Google Search was much better in the past.

I saw an article on a technology Lemmy the other day that showed how Google was pretty much helping to make sure you get shitty results. I'll have to see if I can find it and link it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I stopped using Google as my primary search engine all together. I now just use bing or duck duck go. Google is the last place I try searching.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I stopped using it years ago because they were going downhill and still collecting your private information. I run my own SearXNG now. It proxies from multiple sources, no ads, no tracking. I really enjoy SearXNG as it's mine.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For literal months now because of ChatGPT and reddit, if you google "countries in Africa that start with the letter K" for the first two results Google will say that none exist.

So yes, I would say Google search results are getting worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I use Google with modifiers like plus and minus, quotation marks and most importantly with uBlocklist. This way I can hide seo bullshit with a single click

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The modifiers haven't seemed to work for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Most modifiers were nuked and removed. Few remain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Google has been useless for me for years now. I switched to DuckDuckGo like 5 years ago and every now and then if I accidentally even stray onto Google, I'm just scared by the results

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I use perplexity.ai

Hoping that one day it takes my job and I am okay with it. I already hate my job

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In general yes. I'm not going to pull exact numbers up but I think it started declining around 2018.

I've heard it said they switched to whatever was most profitable rather than what was actually useful or relevant. I still find good results when looking up niche tech issues, but if it's more mainstream I get really weird results, so that might indeed be what's happening.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Looking up niche stuff gets harder and harder it seems. It always seems to "translate" my very specific request into a very general search and giving me useless results. It highlights search terms in the results, which aren't even in my original search query. Google just thinks it knows better and it never ever does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes, and that's why I switched to Kagi

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I, too, switched to Kagi a while back. I was highly skeptical because duckduckgo etc. never worked for me. Instead of finding crap, I found nothing instead. I tried kagi's 100 free searches, and decided that it's worth it. The feature that allows you to block, lower, or raise the appearance of website makes things a lot better after using it for a while.

I don't blindly accept cookies, and at some point noticed just how many health-related pages link to the same lock-out page after denying cookies. So many pages with different fronts that are all the same on the backend of things. Now, none of them even show up in my search results. Slowly, I can actually find useful results, even when searching for something in a field like health which seems to get beaten in nonsense/useful ratio only by few topics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just talking to some people about this. I use to be the guy who researched everything now I feel stupid AF because finding what I'm looking for feels impossible at times. Hell there's times where I search something and Google even says "there's nothing to find".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It's garbage full of seo spam and malicious links

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›