chuckleslord

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The dude lived on top of a pile of gold. Maybe we can also criticize the hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

The Doctor using sexism to control the government

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

Grew up, in this case, would mean your childhood included said media. Yeah, you had the OT in your childhood too, but the prequels weren't strangers there either. Adult star wars fans at the time wanted something for their nostalgia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

Not a book, it's purely fan theory. Canon explanation is she died of sadness. Even book versions of the movie would corroborate this.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

... the kids who grew up with the prequels became the majority on the internet. The original hate was from those who grew up with the original Trilogy.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

Definitely not true. "You are not immune to propaganda" is true for all communities, including autistic ones.

It's just fascists pushing out outgroups. RFK wants to demonize vaccines, so he does campaign work against the autistic community in order to justify it. If you're thinking deeper than that, you're barking up the wrong tree

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Ya know that sound that you can hear under the water at white sand beaches? Sound like sand being ground through a bearing? Or a neck joint pressurizing? Yeah, that's the parrot fish... happily eating away.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

Ze joke is for reading, not hearing

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Maybe we don't let fascists make lists of undesirables, full stop.

This isn't some aspie supremacy shit, this is an existential threat to all of those with autism

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, cause they need to figure out how to get Trump what he wants even though it's clearly dead-brained as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The answer is fucking no, obviously.

 

I don't care if it's in a shitposting community, a meme community, or a news community. If the image or text is generated it should be labeled as such, and failing to label it should be grounds to remove the post. AI slop is a plague and its only going to get worse as the tech matures (if it hasn't already peaked).

I'm so tired of having to call it out every time I see it, especially when people in the comments think it's a photoshop work or (heavens help us) real. Human labor has real tangible value that plagiarism machines can't even pretend to imitate and I'm sick of seeing that shit without it being labeled (so I can filter it out).

 

No idea what's going on here, but figured I'd record it happening. Happened after scrolling past a post and then going back up.

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

35
Aurora rule (lemmy.world)
 
view more: next ›