this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9310 readers
1120 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Well, fuck. That's income I could have really used. This negatively affects people living in poverty the most, and benefits the affluent the most. This better come paired with some kind of financial break for low income earners.

I feel like this signals that Carney is willing to cast aside his principles and throw uninvolved people under the bus so that he can meet his priority goals. Ie, getting ignorant swing voters on his side. This is a blatant campaign move that should have been an election promise, not a unilateral decision.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He is trying to keep PP from getting any raise in the polls.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I believe that's what I said.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

...

Are we still doing "phrasing"?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sadly, most people are idiots and don’t realise it benefits them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

There's at least hope with Carney that he'll come up with another environmental policy that the conservatives brain rotted by Poilievre won't get mad at.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I believe he did promise this before he was elected as head of the liberal party.

Edit: Yes he did

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure I see that as consequential.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

His stated goal is to replace it with something similar but with better branding.

Consider that this effectively kills 90% of PP's campaign rhetoric, and that if PP were to be elected, you'd lose the tax anyway without a replacement.