this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
159 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9574 readers
1456 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada’s largest Muslim organisation is outraged over a bill introduced by the Quebec government that would ban headscarves for school support staff and students.

“In Quebec, we made the decision that state and the religion are separate,” said Education Minister Bernard Drainville, CBC News reported. “And today, we say the public schools are separate from religion.”

But the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM), who are challenging in the Supreme Court the original bill that forbids religious symbols being worn by teachers, say the new bill is another infringement on their rights and unfairly targets hijab-wearing Muslims.

“This renewed attack on the fundamental rights of our community is just one of several recent actions taken by this historically unpopular government to bolster their poll numbers by attacking the rights of Muslim Canadians,” the NCCM said in a social media post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago (19 children)

I think it's a good move that Christians aren't allowed to wear crosses in public anymore. Always reminds me of pedophiles and that makes me feel uncomfortable.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (14 children)

They're not, the CAQ is nothing but hypocrites on the subject. They excluded Christians symbols from the get go.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They excluded religious items that didn't shove oppressive symbolism in people's faces. Get your facts straight.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All religious items are oppressive symbolism to someone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hyperbole and (ironically enough) superstition

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No body was enslaved due to the power of the hijab. Christian pedophiles and their obsession with the cross did use the cross as a power symbol. Interesting how racist and dumb you are

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean. Women in theocratic islamic states get arrested and assaulted if they don't wear their hijab. This is a pretty well documented fact.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran and Libya?

Let's see, house of Saud was supported by the British as an friendly clan who then took over most of arabia and when a king acted against American/British values they got couped

For afganistan look at operation Cyclone, most of these terror groups or their predecessors were funded by America to take out the potentially socialist leaning afganistan among many other nation which later backfired on the American govt

Iran has a democracy under mossadeq until he nationalised oil, made Britain big made, told daddy America it's communism, mossadeq was couped with the Shah, the people then couped the Shah with the islamic fundamentalist among other funding from again America.

Libya had ghaddafi who wasnt no saint by libya thrived under him. America invaded and now it has open slave markets

There's a something that's similar about all these stories I can't get by hear around...

Why is Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Jordan, Lebanon, turkey, Tunisia not killing or arresting women for hijab? That's a far far bigger amount of Muslims?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"They only oppress women because the west were mean to them" you people are genuinely ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that what you got out of my entire comment? You're not proving your point, only you lack education and reading comprehension.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

"I can excuse oppressing women, but I draw the line at oppressing women after The Mean Old West puts you into power."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Well documented by your comment?

Saudi had their Esports covered by women without hijabs. Even when watching Youtube videos about tourists visiting Iran you see plenty of women without hijab.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

And how is the cross not "oppressive symbolism"? It's literally an execution method???

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)