this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
900 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

71537 readers
4244 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 307 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Did the author thinks ChatGPT is in fact an AGI? It's a chatbot. Why would it be good at chess? It's like saying an Atari 2600 running a dedicated chess program can beat Google Maps at chess.

[–] [email protected] 237 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI including ChatGPT is being marketed as super awesome at everything, which is why that and similar AI is being forced into absolutely everything and being sold as a replacement for people.

Something marketed as AGI should be treated as AGI when proving it isn't AGI.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Not to help the AI companies, but why don't they program them to look up math programs and outsource chess to other programs when they're asked for that stuff? It's obvious they're shit at it, why do they answer anyway? It's because they're programmed by know-it-all programmers, isn't it.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because they’re fucking terrible at designing tools to solve problems, they are obviously less and less good at pretending this is an omnitool that can do everything with perfect coherency (and if it isn’t working right it’s because you’re not believing or paying hard enough)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Or they keep telling you that you just have to wait it out. It’s going to get better and better!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago

why don't they program them

AI models aren't programmed traditionally. They're generated by machine learning. Essentially the model is given test prompts and then given a rating on its answer. The model's calculations will be adjusted so that its answer to the test prompt will be closer to the expected answer. You repeat this a few billion times with a few billion prompts and you will have generated a model that scores very high on all test prompts.

Then someone asks it how many R's are in strawberry and it gets the wrong answer. The only way to fix this is to add that as a test prompt and redo the machine learning process which takes an enormous amount of time and computational power each time it's done, only for people to once again quickly find some kind of prompt it doesn't answer well.

There are already AI models that play chess incredibly well. Using machine learning to solve a complexe problem isn't the issue. It's trying to get one model to be good at absolutely everything.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

...or a simple counter to count the r in strawberry. Because that's more difficult than one might think and they are starting to do this now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Because the LLMs are now being used to vibe code themselves.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

They are starting to do this. Most new models support function calling and can generate code to come up with math answers etc

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you pay for chatgpt you can connect it with wolfrenalpha and it's relays the maths to it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I think they're trying to do that. But AI can still fail at that lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

This is where MCP comes in. It's a protocol for LLMs to call standard tools. Basically the LLM would figure out the tool to use from the context, then figure out the order of parameters from those the MCP server says is available, send the JSON, and parse the response.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

why don't they program them to look up math programs and outsource chess to other programs when they're asked for that stuff?

Because the AI doesn't know what it's being asked, it's just a algorithm guessing what the next word in a reply is. It has no understanding of what the words mean.

"Why doesn't the man in the Chinese room just use a calculator for math questions?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't think ai is being marketed as awesome at everything. It's got obvious flaws. Right now its not good for stuff like chess, probably not even tic tac toe. It's a language model, its hard for it to calculate the playing field. But ai is in development, it might not need much to start playing chess.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What the tech is being marketed as and what it’s capable of are not the same, and likely never will be. In fact all things are very rarely marketed how they truly behave, intentionally.

Everyone is still trying to figure out what these Large Reasoning Models and Large Language Models are even capable of; Apple, one of the largest companies in the world just released a white paper this past week describing the “illusion of reasoning”. If it takes a scientific paper to understand what these models are and are not capable of, I assure you they’ll be selling snake oil for years after we fully understand every nuance of their capabilities.

TL;DR Rich folks want them to be everything, so they’ll be sold as capable of everything until we repeatedly refute they are able to do so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think in many cases people intentionally or unintentionally disregard the time component here. Ai is in development. I think what is being marketed here, just like in the stock market, is a piece of the future. I don't expect the models I use to be perfect and not make mistakes, so I use them accordingly. They are useful for what I use them for and I wouldn't use them for chess. I don't expect that laundry detergent to be just as perfect in the commercial either.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Marketing does not mean functionality. AI is absolutely being sold to the public and enterprises as something that can solve everything. Obviously it can't, but it's being sold that way. I would bet the average person would be surprised by this headline solely on what they've heard about the capabilities of AI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think anyone is so stupid to believe current ai can solve everything.

And honestly, I didn't see any marketing material that would claim that.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are both completely over estimating the intelligence level of "anyone" and not living in the same AI marketed universe as the rest of us. People are stupid. Really stupid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't understand why this is so important, marketing is all about exaggerating, why expect something different here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not important. You said AI isn't being marketed to be able to do everything. I said yes it is. That's it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Zoom CEO, that is the video calling software, wanted to train AIs on your work emails and chat messages to create AI personalities you could send to the meetings you're paid to sit through while you drink Corona on the beach and receive a "summary" later.

The Zoom CEO, that is the video calling software, seems like a pretty stupid guy?

Yeah. Yeah, he really does. Really.. fuckin'.. dumb.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Same genius who forced all his own employees back into the office. An incomprehensibly stupid maneuver by an organization that literally owes its success to people working from home.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Really then why are they cramming AI into every app and every device and replacing jobs with it and claiming they’re saving so much time and money and they’re the best now the hardest working most efficient company and this is the future and they have a director of AI vision that’s right a director of AI vision a true visionary to lead us into the promised land where we will make money automatically please bro just let this be the automatic money cheat oh god I’m about to

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those are two different things.

  1. they are craming ai everywhere because nobody wants to miss the boat and because it plays well in the stock market.

  2. the people claiming it's awesome and that they are doing I don't know what with it, replacing people are mostly influencers and a few deluded people.

Ai can help people in many different roles today, so it makes sense to use it. Even in roles that is not particularly useful, it makes sense to prepare for when it is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

it makes sense to prepare for when it is.

Pfft, okay.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google Maps doesn't pretend to be good at chess. ChatGPT does.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A toddler can pretend to be good at chess but anybody with reasonable expectations knows that they are not.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plot twist: the toddler has a multi-year marketing push worth tens if not hundreds of millions, which convinced a lot of people who don't know the first thing about chess that it really is very impressive, and all those chess-types are just jealous.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you tried feeding the toddler gallons of baby-food? Maybe then it can play chess

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They’ve been feeding the toddler everybody else’s baby food and claiming they have the right to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

"If we have to ask every time before stealing a little baby food, our morbidly obese toddler cannot survive"

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most people do. It's just called AI in the media everywhere and marketing works. I think online folks forget that something as simple as getting a Lemmy account by yourself puts you into the top quintile of tech literacy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

well so much hype has been generated around chatgpt being close to AGI that now it makes sense to ask questions like "can chatgpt prove the Riemann hypothesis"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I agree with your general statement, but in theory since all ChatGPT does is regurgitate information back and a lot of chess is memorization of historical games and types, it might actually perform well. No, it can't think, but it can remember everything so at some point that might tip the results in it's favor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Regurgitating an impression of, not regurgitating verbatim, that's the problem here.

Chess is 100% deterministic, so it falls flat.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm guessing it's not even hard to get it to "confidently" violate the rules.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Articles like this are good because it exposes the flaws with the ai and that it can't be trusted with complex multi step tasks.

Helps people see that think AI is close to a human that its not and its missing critical functionality

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem is though that this perpetuates the idea that ChatGPT is actually an AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think that’s generally the point is most people thing chat GPT is this sentient thing that knows everything and… no.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do they though? No one I talked to, not my coworkers that use it for work, not my friends, not my 72 year old mother think they are sentient.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Okay I maybe exaggerated a bit, but a lot of people think it actually knows things, or is actually smart. Which… it’s not… at all. It’s just pattern recognition. Which was I assume the point of showing it can’t even beat the goddamn Atari because it cannot think or reason, it’s all just copy pasta and pattern recognition.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

OpenAI has been talking about AGI for years, implying that they are getting closer to it with their products.

https://openai.com/index/planning-for-agi-and-beyond/

https://openai.com/index/elon-musk-wanted-an-openai-for-profit/

Not to even mention all the hype created by the techbros around it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Hey I didn't say anywhere that corporations don't lie to promote their product did I?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In all fairness. Machine learning in chess engines is actually pretty strong.

AlphaZero was developed by the artificial intelligence and research company DeepMind, which was acquired by Google. It is a computer program that reached a virtually unthinkable level of play using only reinforcement learning and self-play in order to train its neural networks. In other words, it was only given the rules of the game and then played against itself many millions of times (44 million games in the first nine hours, according to DeepMind).

https://www.chess.com/terms/alphazero-chess-engine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Sure, but machine learning like that is very different to how LLMs are trained and their output.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I like referring to LLMs as VI (Virtual Intelligence from Mass Effect) since they merely give the impression of intelligence but are little more than search engines. In the end all one is doing is displaying expected results based on a popularity algorithm. However they do this inconsistently due to bad data in and limited caching.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, but keep in mind ChatGPT advocates, including the company itself are referring to it as AI, including in marketing. They're saying it's a complete, self-learning, constantly-evolving Artificial Intelligence that has been improving itself since release... And it loses to a 4KB video game program from 1979 that can only "think" 2 moves ahead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That's totally fair, the company is obviously lying, excuse me "marketing", to promote their product, that's absolutely true.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I mean, open AI seem to forget it isn’t.