this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10138 readers
546 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wow, theyre prioritizing the well being of the country over the environment and indigenous people?

Its like they're finally trying to keep us in a first world standard of living; because they were about to be destroyed as a party entirely if they did not.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Your well being depends on the environment and any improvement to your well being should not come at a detriment to the people your country colonized and genocided.

Environmental protection acts do not exist to protect the environment. They exist to protect you from what business owners will do to your environment in the name of profit seeking.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Promised actions of good should never come at the expense of any singular group, minority, people.

In addition destroying our land to fuel the economic engine will only benefit capitalist systems and corporations.

I've yet to see how this would sustainably benefit foreign people in their own country so to import this into Canada seems ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

Its an export of a product, which derives tax revenue, which derives income taxes, which results in government programs to help the poor. Pretending like its not vital in our ecosystem is silly, its our food source, it provides us building materials, corporate exports give your dollar value and are the red blood cells of society.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

Lmao, the workers do not share in the profits of corporations. As if 😭

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Theyre literally paid out of the profits. You're spouting nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Found the manager. Businesses pay employees as little as is legally possible in many cases while raking in huge profits.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You receive a miniscule percentage of the value you create for your employer. The employer needs profits to increase constantly in order to provide value to the shareholders. When the total value of the company increases you at best receive the same cut of the value your produce. Usually though, your percentage cut decreases relative to total value so that the employer can extract greater value as demanded by shareholders. You aren't paid out of the profits, they take a cut of the value you produce by virtue of owning the company. This is why wages do not increase proportionally to productivity. I am not spouting nonsense, you just aren't equipped to understand what I am saying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Employers expend the least amount of resources necessary in order to maximize their profits, this is a practice that is not only accepted but celebrated as being "good" for the economy. So workers should follow suit and expend the least amount of their skills and labour in order to maximize their profits. If it is acceptable at the scale of billions it should be acceptable on the scale of thousands.

There is no 'theft of time' from an entity that owns more than 1/4 (plus commute) of your life.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Revenue and profits are not the same thing. If you're going to abrasively assert stuff, at least don't be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

Fedecan is a nonprofit

I'm not paid to do anything

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Take from one group of poor people to benefit another group of poor people? That doesn't sound like a good thing to me.