this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9993 readers
390 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What a mystery this is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Corporate taxes used to cover over 30% of government revenue, it's 10% now. The top marginal income tax rate peaked in the 1960s at somewhere around 80% on income exceeding ~3M/year (today's money). We've had 4 decades of tax cuts while the cost of delivering services has increased more or less with the inflation rate. Private equity funds now have favourable tax treatment, and stock buybacks, previously considered illegal stock manipulation is a common practice. And so on and so forth.

If you want what you had, you have to do what you did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm inclined to suspect the corporate taxes covering 30 percent down to ten, is more related to an increase in government spending and increasing individual's taxes, than cutting corporate, because, believe it or not, they tax the living shit out of businesses, much more and it'll start to cause failures. Often times businesses that would be quite profitable just on the other side of the border, are barely making it despite comparable sales, and taxes go up tomorrow,

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Corporations aren’t your friends, they aren’t going to give you any preferential treatment that they aren’t seeing the better side of.

Capital flight is also not a thing, it’s a bogeyman set up by conservatives to avoid raising taxes.

Businesses also won’t leave. Their remarkable treatment in Canada will go down to slightly less remarkable. They moan and groan and set up a whole ad campaign about how this is going to hurt the consumer but that means it’s working. And if you mean “small business” there are so so so many way ways to create exceptions or offer grants to Canadians starting or operating small businesses, where the target is larger oligopolies and conglomerates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's absolutely a thing, most corporations are a couple people running a business, and capital flight is absolutely a fucking thing, Just look at the difference between Saskatchewan and Alberta over 50 years because of different tax/government policies with the same base conditions and people. And then look at Montana for a third perspective of the same base conditions. It is so tiring listening to people buy these asinine takes in complete rejection of reality.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny that you mention complete rejection of reality... Did you even read the article?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I posted it for the title, not cause I believe everything I read in it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well then your a fucking idiot. And I vote you off this country fuck face

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Being called this by what appears to be a Liberal supporter is actually a compliment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Once again. Corporations aren’t your friend, no matter the head count. It’s that simple. Don’t simp for people who don’t give a fuck about you or your family. Full stop.

Second. Again. Capital flight is a boogeyman. Alberta and Sask aren’t comparable. Alberta has cities, amenities and established populations, Sask doesn’t. If you want to take anything flight seriously, how about brain drain in our high paying, sought after career sectors, where we educate our population only for them to leave for better opportunities elsewhere? Doctors aren’t going to stay for the pittance, and software engineers aren’t going to keep staying for the remarkable amount of investment the government is putting to try to establish STEM in Canada because the private sector isn’t competitive with their salaries. Fuck your capital flight, if these are the corporations you’re afraid of leaving I’m more than willing to say goodbye, because the ones who fill the gaps will likely see the case studies and change course.

I’ll give you a spoiler alert. They’re not going anywhere. Just like they haven’t left Aus, NZ or the other dozen and change 1st world countries with high corporate tax rates than Canada. It’s not happening, you’re afraid of a ghost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Alberta has all those things because what I said happened THEN, you disingenuous goof. Capital flight is brain drain, they're one and the same.

Aus, NZ or the other dozen

They've all been left behind. Fuck, you need to travel.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they tax the living shit out of businesses

Yeah. It's how we spend on keeping Canadians healthy and happy like every other happy country does. Keep up.

And TEN IS LESS THAN THIRTY like it was in the Good Old days we seemed to survive before, in those years when we built things like bridges and railways (those are the rotting, unmaintained things we non-helicopter-owning wage-slaves use) like Sweden and Denmark do to this day.

increase in government spending

TAX AND SPEND. Keep up. It's a whole thing.

quite profitable just on the other side of the border

Unless you mean on Miquelon or Greenland, you must be talking about the border to that user-pays, fuck-the-plebes, birth-slavery, medical-bankruptcy hell to our south.

Having lived there, I fervently hope you aren't holding that nearly-fascist mess as a goal. Alberta is cruel enough for us; let's not go full American.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

they tax the living shit out of businesses, much more and it'll start to cause failures.

Why?

Taxes are on revenues, not gross profits. That's why EBIT exists as a performance measure.

As a quick example of a made up corp:

Gross profits 1.1B

COGS + OpExp 1.0B

EBIT 100M

Taxes 10% (30%)

Revenues 90M (70M)

Now mom and pop barely alive

Gross profits 500k

COGS + OpExp 500k

EBIT 0

Taxes 10% (30%)

Revenues 0 (0)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hey genius, people don't continue on with businesses of zero net. Taxes in many provinces are at the point what would be otherwise profitable businesses aren't worth it, that's why you see so many abandoned. Taxes aren't just on revenue, they're on every aspect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Hey genius,

Not a genius, just a bit of experience with small non-profits that share commonality with small businesses.

people don't continue on with businesses of zero net.

They absolutely do. A lot of my friends are professionals that run net zero after they pay themselves.

Taxes in many provinces are at the point what would be otherwise profitable businesses aren't worth it, that's why you see so many abandoned.

No, they are abandoned because they failed or the owner didn't want to run them anymore

Taxes aren't just on revenue, they're on every aspect.

Yeah sure, but that has to do with an increase in COGS, not the increase of tax on the business. There as soany impacts on COGS that you can't narrow it down to a single thing. Even large corps switch between vetricalizing and not depending on situations beyond more than just tax.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Lets break this down for you. Take beer. a bar doesn't pay gst, pst or lct when it buys it, only when it sells it, but there's already an excise and other taxes on it long before it reaches point of final sale. so say 45-55 dollars price a 24 case for the liquor store or bar if in a province with a form of LCB monopoly yet. the bar can't sell it for less than 70 bucks or it's paying you to leave with it. 75 now as of the federal increase depending on province, just to not lose money selling beer to leave the premises, and you don't want to increase it to a point you make money off that, because it's at least getting people in the door because you're price matching the liquor store, Then the carbon tax. the bills. the taxes on those, the tax tax tax on tax. if you do manage to make any money after all that, they tax that too. Small business books look like the shit people used try kill the sheriff of Nottingham and prince john for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's a long winded explanation for saying taxes are one part of COGS. Do taxes impact COGS? Absolutely. But so do other regulations, market pressureus, trade deals, weather, road repairs, train breakdowns, flu season intensity, water table levels, how much commission the sales guy gets, etc, etc, etc.