62
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It’s a significant reversal from recent history: President Joe Biden is struggling with young voters but performing better than most Democrats with older ones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

It’s a failure of the news and social media. If they read about the massive green initiatives, increased corporate and wealth taxes, ending food supply chain greedflation, advancing equity and racial justice, student loan reimbursement, and housing affordability, they may feel differently.

Instead, they think Trump will “shake up the system.” All he did with his last term was roll back safety and environmental regulations on business, and implement a tax break that expired after four years for the low and middle class but remains intact for the wealthy today.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Just because people don't support Biden doesn't mean they're voting for Trump. This is a false dichotomy.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, that’s the nature of US elections. Maybe one day it’ll change, but for now these are the only votes that will carry through the Electoral College.

FWIW I’d love to see us remove the Electoral College, abolish Gerrymandering, and implement ranked-choice voting to introduce more parties to the table.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

All you Blue MAGA folks pretend like their aren't any candidates with basic human decency running for president. Guess what? I have my choice of three candidates who have at least a bare minimum of human decency. And you have three candidates who support genocide. You make your choice; I'll make mine.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

What?

Are you talking about the primaries? I'm like 99.9999% sure they all dropped out. You're stuck with Trump and we're stuck with Biden.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm talking about the general

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I’m not suggesting you make a different choice than the two. I’m stating that it will not affect US elections in their current structure. You do you.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Scribbling over that section of the ballot is also a distinct choice you have. That would affect the outcome just as much as voting third party.

"Blue MAGA." It's wild how far-right actors have the self-awareness to write "Blueanon" or "Blue MAGA." Cool to see their strategies are working and the term is getting picked up with other groups.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

that’s the nature of US elections

then they arent really democratic are they

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It’s a representative democracy, not a direct democracy. The founders created the Electoral College to assist in elections due to lack of nationwide information on the candidates. That’s clearly not an issue anymore.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yeah, if the parties are putting out only two candidades that people hate, maybe thats not a good idea

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The National Committees (DNC and RNC) produce the candidates.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, there are only TWO choices in the 2024 election - you are either voting for democracy or dictatorship - period

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

When is the democracy supposed to start?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No, you're either voting for genocide or human decency - period.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Genocide AND human decency VS an end to democracy and just not caring about anyone outside the border short of a migrant caravan.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I think you left off the part of the second candidate encouraging more genocide along with ending democracy.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

no one is promising to end democracy

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

no one is promising to end democracy

Didn't one candidate say they would literally be a dictator..."but only on day one." I find it hard to trust anyone who ways they'd be a dictator any amount of time, and then stop. Dictatorship and democracy are polar opposites.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

with the rise of executive power from executive orders, every president is a dictator say one, rolling back previous administration policy and implementing their own.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

every president is a dictator day one, rolling back previous administration policy and implementing their own.

That's not what a dictatorship is. A dictatorship is where one person (the dictator) has almost complete control over the government with few, if any, restrictions. Executive orders can only be within the President's authority, and can also be overturned by Congress or the Supreme Court. To link executive orders to a dictatorship shows a misunderstanding of executive orders, dictatorships, or both.

Also, in the quote of being a "dictator for just one day," executive orders were not mentioned, if I remember correctly. And no democratic President should ever think of themselves as a dictator or wish they were one.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To link executive orders to a dictatorship shows a misunderstanding of executive orders, dictatorships, or both.

Also, in the quote of being a “dictator for just one day,” executive orders were not mentioned

no one is accusing trump of being a knowledgeable statesman.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

no one is accusing trump of being a knowledgeable statesman.

That was actually you who linked them, not him. And they shouldn't be linked. Executive orders are not a dictatorship. But let's say he meant, even though he's famous for saying what he means with no filter.

Even after campaigning for it, holding the office for 4 years, presumably keeping an eye on his successor for 4 years, and now campaigning for it again? You'd think he'd know the basics of what is a democracy, what is a dictatorship, what executive orders do, and what do the different branches of government roughly do...you know, the basics that were taught in middle school, and elaborated on in high school. These aren't niche laws or obscure cases we're talking about, but what should be common sense to the common man...much more so for someone who's running for the job. Willful ignorance is not an excuse, especially at that level...if that's what this is.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

i think he's a dummy, and he may be operating on my folksy definition of "dictator". my assumption is just as valid as yours.

so it's dumb to say it that way, but i don't believe he ever said he's planning to "end democracy" or even meant to imply that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Insurrecting against a country because they voted for someone else is a pretty solid promise on its own.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not encouraging, just not standing in the way of it happening.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Wait, which candidate in your analysis is the candidate representing human decency?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Jill Stein, Cornel West, De La Cruz

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Only one of two people is going to win. It’s about as true of a dichotomy as you can get in politics. Your other option is to throw away your vote, which is the same as not voting.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

There are at least six people running. Three are running on the genocide platform, three are running on the human decency platform. It's about as true of a dichotomy as you can get in politics.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Two of those people have a chance at winning. Four of those people have a chance at splitting the vote enough that the other of the two wins.

I don’t like that that’s how our system is. It’s fucked. But that is how our system is.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

He's like a dude playing the lotto. "Well either I win or I don't, that's two possible outcomes... 50/50 chance."

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
62 points (100.0% liked)

News

31214 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS