this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
498 points (100.0% liked)

News

30842 readers
2515 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Biden administration last week put a hold on a shipment of U.S.-made ammunition to Israel, two Israeli officials told Axios.

Why it matters: It is the first time since the Oct. 7 attack that the U.S. has stopped a weapons shipment intended for the Israeli military. The incident raised serious concerns inside the Israeli government and sent officials scrambling to understand why the shipment was held, Israeli officials said. President Biden is facing sharp criticism among Americans who oppose his support of Israel. The administration in February asked Israel to provide assurances that U.S.-made weapons were being used by Israel Defense Forces in Gaza in accordance with international law. Israel provided a signed letter of assurances in March.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We've been shipping Israel ammo to kill Palestinians for over half a year. We only now stopped one shipment. Think about that.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 year ago

Best time to stop was yesterday, second best time is today.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We’ve been shipping Israel ammo to kill Palestinians for decades

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

If we accept this as a justification for continuing, we'll never stop.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It was initially for defense after a massacre when the Iron Dome was breached in October. That was completely justified support. The munitions sold since Netanyahu began indiscriminately killing Palestinians are not.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They've been indiscriminately killing Palestinians long before October.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They've been indiscriminately killing Palestinians long before October.

And during that very long time, Eisenhower, Johnson, Ford, Nixon, Regan, Clinton, both Bushes, Carter, Obama, Trump and until recently Biden didn’t stop selling Israel weapons.

And now Biden has started to cut them off.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Reagan held up arms shipments to Israel on multiple occasions.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

He did not. He withheld all aid from Israel, and then provided military aid under the agreement that they’d use it to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon. That was after he sold the weapons to Iran in the Iran-Contra scandal that ended up in the hands of Hezbollah.

The man literally put this shit pot on the stove and started stirring. Do not glorify his actions in this conflict.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The previous attacks during the Biden administration were attempted attacks on Hamas, not attacks directed at Palestinians. If Israel always wanted to kill all Palestinians, that would’ve been done in 1985 when this conflict started. Netanyahu has been using the attack on Oct. 7 to justify the shift in tactics from targeting Hamas to “we can’t tell them apart.”

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hamas isn't even in the West Bank yet Shireen Abu Akleh was murdered there in 2022, while clearly marked as a journalist. There are so many incidents I could pull up as examples of indiscriminate killings but your ignorance is not worth my time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not saying the IDF didn’t kill Palestinians before Oct 7th. I’m saying they began targeting both Hamas and Palestinians alike after the attack.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Israel only came into existence following ethic cleansing committed against civilians in 1947-1948. Israel has targeted civilians its entire history.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  1. No, all the children shot during the March of Return were not Hamas, nor were the thousands killed before 2006.

  2. Palestinians have a right to resist. Israel, being an illegitimate settler apartheid state, has no such right. Attacks on Hamas are not justified.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correct. The Great March of Return was during the Trump Administration. The thread commenter was talking about the last six months of munitions supplied to Israel. Maybe this is the start of change.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

American policy regarding Isreal is bipartisan stop shifting the blame and own up.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You say in a thread where the current president has delayed weapons delivery for the first time in 50 years. STFU

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not because he personally wants to, go check what he's on the record as saying his entire career. This isn't something to applaud, this is him trying to avoid political blowback. You think we should stop applying pressure because of a single descision?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The other commenter didn't say that, but also, shouldn't we be pleased that a politician, the literal President of the United States, is buckling to public pressure here? Isn't that the whole point of democracy is that they are supposed to represent the will of the people? That he is doing this in spite of his own personal interest is pretty amazing and stark compared to Trump.

I think we should take wins like this seriously, the system is working as it should for a brief moment here. Progress takes time, let's celebrate how quickly an 81 year old man is changing course on something lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hard to celebrate anything with so much money stolen from the American people and so many Palestinians dead.

This is shameful and the fact that Trump is worse is no excuse, raise your expectations. There are ongoing protests being violently repressed and all Biden has to say about it is "law and order", wake up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

That is very clearly not all he has to say, he has just now interrupted a 50-year supply of military arms to an ally, for the first time ever as far as I am aware. They're building a literal seaport for aid delivery. The president often can't unilaterally make decisions, much of the funding especially for Israel is packaged into bills made by Congress, that are usually a small part of a larger budget.

The protests are working, as intended. The government is changing their tune, as intended. Maybe I am awake, maybe you're the one who's asleep. Maybe not. In my eyes though this is how democracy has always worked. You argue until the other side is convinced, which we are in the middle of doing and succeeding at.

You equated Biden and Trump. We have their two presidencies to refer to now, we don't have to guess, and they look and sound a lot different on Israel to me. We'll see what Biden does if they invade Rafah.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's possible to justify support for apartheid.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Agreed. It’s been the standard since Israel was conceived in 1948, but there are a lot more liberal people in Israel now. The ultra-orthodox make up only 13% now, and those are the conservatives that got Netanyahu into power. He only has a 15% approval rating since January, and there have been massive protests since March. Let’s hope they do the right thing with the next election and allow Palestinians access to their holy land.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Netanyahu's opposition are even more openly fascist. There is no meaningful left in Israel.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds like ignorant nationalism. I have Israeli-American friends that describe the party very differently. I may believe you if you could substantiate it with proof of their fascist left wing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The very fact that their "left" still wants an apartheid state! There's no Israeli left party that wants to give equal rights to Palestinians and return their homes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They don’t. A large faction of Israel’s left wing believes in one-state. 20% of Israeli Jews believe in a one state solution, as do most Arab/Palestian Israelis. It’s been growing as time passes and the older generations die.

https://www.pcpsr.org/sites/default/files/Summary%20Report_%20English_Joint%20Poll%2024%20Jan%202023.pdf

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

The trick here, that was even covered in that paper, is the difference between what Palestinians think a one state solution is and what Israelis think a one state solution is.

In that study they found the Palestinians viewed a single country with equal rights for all as a one state solution. The Israelis thought it meant a state with all of the territory but without the Palestinians.

Frankly, the liberal Israelis wouldn't be for a one state solution if it also meant giving up the land and property stolen from the Palestinians through terrorism.

"Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds"

Watch how fast they'd turn right wing if property in west Jerusalem or east Jerusalem had to be given up.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the equivalent of someone taking your house and throwing you in the basement and then when you come out and attack decades later they fight back and say its for self defense. Please.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

So Native Americans should just start murdering Americans until they leave? One state is the only equitable solution at this point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  1. I'm not against a one state solution
  2. Stolen land/property should be given back
  3. Your example is disanalgous, run the clock back to when the colonies were being formed. If a colonist from Europe came and took their house or the land they use or live on they have every right to fight back.
  4. If a colonist attacks me and kills my family I have a right to fight back. If I fight back then its not self defense for them but for me.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

No one in Israel wants that.

Also, this comparison is very apt. Israelis explicitly want to get to the point where they have the land and can just give land acknowledgments. This view though is dependent on "Never Again'' meaning nothing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

20% of Israeli Jews and most Arab/Palestinian Israelis are in support of a one state solution, with numbers increasing as the older generations die off. Vilification of Israelis is no different than the dehumanization of Palestinians that you’re protesting. No group of people deserves simplification.

https://www.pcpsr.org/sites/default/files/Summary%20Report_%20English_Joint%20Poll%2024%20Jan%202023.pdf

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I edited my comment while you responded. That was not done maliciously.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I did the same after reading your edit. Lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was never justified and this didn't start that day

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Correct. Killing Palestinians is not justified. What I wrote was providing defense to an ally that was just attacked is standard, and justified.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Nobody needs 2000lb bombs - which the US itself doesn't use because they blow up entire quarters and have massive collateral damage - for defense.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These things take time, it’s shitty but this gives me hope that things might actually change.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden never had to start circumventing congress to sell weapons in the first place. His hands have never been tied here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but hopefully he now realizes the error of his ways. Young people overwhelmingly do not support the US's support of Israel. He knows more about what is happening there than any of us do, and he was all for it until this possible shipment halt. Maybe he's finally realized that bibi has gone too far.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure he just hopes everyone won't be paying attention when he resumes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am no friend of Bibi or the IDFs action towards Palestinians, but let’s be fair - the northern border has been lit up lately, and Biden is still a self described Zionist. Not ‘defending’ the Jewish state is going to be a big line in the sand for him

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Seriously... When was the last time you talked to someone his age and changed their minds about something political?

This is part of the danger with a de facto gerontocracy, to be ruled by bad ideas that, with a patina of age, enjoy the status of tradition.