this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
358 points (100.0% liked)

News

28701 readers
4058 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to nearly a dozen retired officers and current military lawyers, as well as scholars who teach at West Point and Annapolis, an intense if quiet debate is underway inside the U.S. military community about what orders it would be obliged to obey if President-elect Donald Trump decides to follow through on his previous warnings that he might deploy troops against what he deems domestic threats, including political enemies, dissenters and immigrants.

Archived at https://archive.is/He9O6

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 210 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

"There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state. The other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people."

-Commander Adama

[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The reason is that one is trained to (supposedly) keep the peace and prevent and investigate crimes. The other is trained to kill people. Military methods are incompatible with effective police work.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ironically the American military is better at it than the police are. They usually only kill someone if they were being fired at first. It’s called rules of engagement. American police have zero concept of it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not exactly, read more US history, especially in situation when the military was called in to remove demonstrators. Look up the Bonus Army and no fucks were given even though the protestors were WW I veterans. Douglas MacArthur and George Patton were involved too. Disgusting piece of history.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

You know that happened over 100 years ago right? Things have changed since then. If you wanted to make a good case, then you should have brought up Kent State because that one is very valid for criticism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kent State was national guard. I would have brought up something like drone strikes or the infamous "collateral murder".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The infamous "collateral murder" was selectively edited by Assange. And there are some very good reasons to use drone strikes, even against US citizens who are also at the time enemy combatants. And by "enemy combatant," I mean literally that, not just someone the US president doesn't like. I mean people who are attached to an organization such as Al-Qaida or to the military of a hostile state, taking up arms against the US or US allies. They're as bad as Russian assets going into politics to betray the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I am choosing to believe you are saying all this ironically.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Largely because they’ve spent two decades trying to police Afghanistan.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

Wait.....which is which?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

Trump literally calls anyone who disagrees with him an "enemy of the state", so yeah, we're way past that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If that guy truly believes cops "serves and protects the people"...

Then we shouldn't be listening to anything they have to say.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The guy is a fictional character in a TV show, and he is arguing that his military troops should not be used for police work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ah, so it's not relevant at all because it's literally not even based on our own universe...

Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a hypothetical scenario on a military warship in space with refugees in tow.

Also, it's not even praising the police, just stating its purpose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

it’s not even praising the police, just stating its purpose

Maybe in that universe...

In ours "serve and protect" was never what the police were for, it was just a PR slogan they put in cruisers

That's what I'm talking about, our universe is not the same, although you seem to not be sure about how our universe works...

If not youd see why the quote isn't applicable.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm familiar with the scene and stand by my statement.

Are you claiming you're a black guy now? That's pretty much what I'd expect from you (people).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nah, just what I think of everytime

I have no interest in a slap fight, have a nice life.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

You're like 14 comments deep in probably the stupidest one I've ever seen.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Same, enjoy your day.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh shut up dude. We see what you are doing. You are literally being DISINGENUOUS.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

He's downvoted as hell, don't give him any more attention.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

You're so dark and edgy. Do you also use phrases like "the owning class" after reading that summary of Karl Marx that one time?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The US isn't the entire universe.
It's not even half of North America.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Science Fiction is largely used as an allegory to explore the real human condition in a way that is parallel to political and cultural topics of the day without the inherent baggage that people would bring to exploring the real topic.

While the original quote and topic is about deploying a military as a policing force, it actually also holds true in the reverse as well, as policing forces shift towards an adversarial militarization against their community, leading directly to the issues you raised in the first comment about the failure of them to live up to the "protect and serve" motto.

While fictional events aren't real, they are written by real people with views, desires and goals. Good writers will have internal consistency for their characters and try to ensure their external interactions have the authenticity of the ring of truth, because that's how people will relate to the characters and story.

Good fiction is just a random meaningless story, it's a platform for education and safe exploration of the real human condition.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but in the real America police have literally never had "serve and protect" as part of their duties...

It was just a PR slogan.

Invalidating the whole analogy.

It's just not relevant, and I'm sorry I can't communicate that in a way you can grok

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Good thing you'll never read 1984, or animal farm, or brave new world, or anything by P.K. Dick, because, yep, completely irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No idea why you would make that assumption...

Or why you think that would be meaningful to the discussion...

Just sounds like a bad attempt at an insult which resulted in demonstrating ignorance. If that was your goal, then well done.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Your comment is not relevant because words.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

You don't argue from a place of good faith in the first place. No one is going to take you seriously.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Also, just to add some context for the specific example of Battlestar Galactica: the show premiered in 2004. The 9/11 attacks were still fresh in peoples' minds. Congress had passed the Patriot Act giving law enforcement and intelligence services new directives to surveil and police US citizens and look for signs of future terrorist plots. We were entrenched in two new wars, and there were lots of protests. There were scandals involving the president and his advisors misleading the public about the nature and quality of intelligence they had.

The plot and themes of B:G were a direct response to all of this. The idea of martial law being declared and rights being suspended was not some far-fetched idea the show writers were playing with. People were really concerned that it might happen to squash public unrest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The new battlestar galactica was very much based on earth's problems.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It's a fictional character from Battlestar Galactica.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

So say we all!