this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
1117 points (100.0% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4803 readers
5 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 100 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The polygamy thing works great for new religions because it is a sure fire way to easily create more adherents from a small amount of stock. Indoctrinating children from birth is way easier than converting adults.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It also makes it way easier to convert some adults

[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Mostly male adults

Mostly.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Any man who claims he's only polygamous for religious reasons is lying. We all know he just wants a harem of women in his bed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Hey now don't be bigoted. Some of us want harems with more than just plain old women.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

This is why islam allows 4 wives

[–] [email protected] 55 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I believe that Satan has a hold of you.

I believe that the Lord God has sent me here.

And I believe that in 1978 God changed his mind about black people.

-"I Believe" from The Book of Mormon (the musical)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

We got the golden plates!

[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think anyone was framing Mormons as the good guys

Even by the standards of organized religion, Mormonism is very weird. Cf Ruby Franke. The early history is absolutely wild, and in Utah they still have tons of money and power and everyone acts like it’s just a normal thing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

The early history is absolutely wild, and in Utah they still have tons of money and power and everyone acts like it’s just a normal thing.

Replace Utah with USA, and it's the same thing with a lot of shit.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Now imagine how much the christian god's mind was changed by the roman government

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Well, given that not long after the emperor converts it became deadly to possess the version of Jesus's sayings which claims he said "Let one who has become wealthy reign, and let one who has power renounce " (allegedly said at the time when Tiberius was the first emperor to inherit the kingdom due to dynastic claim vs accomplishments and had abandoned ruling to party but wouldn't turn over the position to anyone else) - probably just a wee bit of mind changing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thousands of Christians were martyred in the first centuries after Christs death. Often they were tortured and/or crucified.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Not exactly a punishment that was unique to the Christian.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, Joseph Smith wrote "The Articles of Faith" well before polygamy was abolished, which states:

  1. We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.

So the belief that polygamy still has value may remain. Or it may not. It's hard to tell without a change in the law.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mormons still practise polygamy sort of. They have "sealings" which is marriage forever, not just "'til death do us part". If a widow is to remarry, she needs to break the sealing to her dead spouse if she wishes to be sealed to get new one (or she could stay sealed to her first spouse and only marry the second until death).

A widower, however, doesn't need to break the previous sealing. He can be sealed to multiple women no problem. Essentially polygamy, but only in the afterlife.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Can confirm. If any Mormons are reading this and think it's made up-- ASK YOUR BISHOP what happens if you were to die or have a civil divorce and you or your spouse wants to remarry in the temple.

They don't teach this openly, and your bishop may beat around the bush but this is all true.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've hung out with a bunch of Mormons and while they personally felt it was weird now, because they have grown up in a monogamous nation, the church itself would definitely gear up to switch back, if it was legal.

That would be a process, though. They are currently taught that it is morally fine, but following the laws of the land is important, and basically treat it like part of their history. On an individual level, the ones I know seemed fine with that, even those that had an active role in the church.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's also not that strange in more secular contexts, see this article about polyamory in general. So I think it makes sense for people to be okay with the concept of plural marriage, while not wanting to engage with it themselves (e.g. it wouldn't work for me).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

I suspect most of the time, non monogamy via religion is going to be shitty. It's probably going to favor men and be controlling.

I know many people who do consensual non monogamy in real life. Personally I don't like the DADT or strictly-hierarchical modes

People who aren't familiar with it say some pretty wild things about it.

My take is if you can have multiple friends, and you're okay with your friends having friends, you're like 80% of the way there.

The last 20% is likely to crash into "it just is, stop asking me to introspect this is uncomfortable and I'm mad!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah I agree. Religions have bonus rules related to that, but consent makes it fine, there's no actual ick there innately. There's plenty of room for a religion to make it creepy and not OK, but that's not fundamentally tied to polygamy.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I think organized religion is always a risk for causing trouble, but this Mormon God's flexibility is exactly the kind of anti-extremist leadership I'd like to see more of if we are going to keep doing the religion thing. Now if only he would get cool with beer and coffee.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The funny part is that Mormon god was only flexible when it suited Joseph Smith.

I mean, it's kinda oddly coincidental that God spoke to JS and told him that polygamy was ok right after his wife told him she was furiously against it, don't you think?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Honey, that was God, he just called and said it's totally OK for me to be into both you AND your sister. He said you really should chill about it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Utah has a legal limit on the amount of alcohol that can be in cocktails because of those puritans lmfao

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Now if only he would get cool with beer and coffee.

And birthdays and people who don't believe in him

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Extremist anti-religion is way better. Then we won't have to compromise on weak-ass beer too.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Note that slavery was abolished in 1865 and the civil rights movement started in 1950s-1960s.

And in 1978 mormon god said that black men can have the priesthood which is mormon god's way of saying black men are treated as equals now. (Women, regardless of race, never were treated equally and still aren't).

The Mormon church likes to celebrate the fact that black men are treated equally but they never mention that this was 110 years after slavery was abolished and still ~3 decades after the civil rights movement started. Mormon God sure has great timing.

But polygamy is actually still alive and well in the Mormon church, and i mean the actual Mormon church and not an offshoot. The Mormons stopped practicing polygamy outright but it is still alive in how they actually treat marriage.

Under mormonism they marry you for eternity. Except if your spouse wants a divorce or they die then you are no longer married from a civil law perspective. If a woman wants to get married again then she needs to have special permission from the Mormon prophet which i believe they do to release her from the Mormon eternal sealing. To do this they also try to get the ex-husbands approval (and too bad if he's dead). Where this gets interesting is that if the husband wants to remarry then he can. No strings attached. He can have as many eternal sealings as he wants. No permission needed from the prophet or wife. Just can have only one civil marriage at a time but if you get a civil divorce then a man can easily get another eternal marriage and a woman cannot. Basically this means that Mormons are letting men practice polygamy in the afterlife. It's wild.

But this just one example of how women aren't treated equally in the Mormon church. And don't get me started on LGBTQIA+. But if you ever hear someone say mormonism likes the the gays they are gaslighting you. They believe that being gay is a sin and you can only be accepted at arm's reach if you're gay, but never do anything gay, and conform to your gender. Telling someone you accept them while believing part of them they can't change is a sin is Olympic level mental gymnastics. But welcome to Mormonism!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

But if you ever hear someone say mormonism likes the the gays they are gaslighting you.

There are a lot of members that don't agree with the church's approach to the LGBTQIA+ community. They hope to change things from within and don't always leave because they hold out hope things will change. Not all mormons are the fuckin mindless whack jobs, though there are plenty of those around. Plenty are really normal people and they disagree with the way the church handles certain topics.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Hello, I'm well aware that there can be good-intentioned people in the mormon church, however, I'd ask you to consider what it means to stay a member of an organization whose teachings lead to LGBTQIA+ youth committing suicide at a prevalence higher than other states? How can you be a member of an organization that doesn't, really, treat women equally when you stop to think about it? There are a lot of warts in the mormon church, and they have rewritten the history and have been gaslighting their members about it. You've been told that people will just try to spread lies about the church, and that the church is true so you don't need to question it. But if the church is true then it should be able to stand up to scrutiny of your own research.

Just because you think you are doing some greater good by trying to change the mormon church from within doesn't mean you're not oppressing LGBTQIA+ directly or indirectly. Consider this-- does someone joining the KKK with the intent to change it from within make them not a racist? How many years can they be part of that organization before they are complicit?

I'm sorry if any of this seems too harsh, these are just things I wish I would've thought about a few decades sooner. Best of luck in whichever path you take.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The Jehovah's Witnesses have this problem too. Their workaround is that "their [anonymous] governing body has had new revelations and insights" so now it works like this.

For a cult to survive the death of its founder, it needs to be picked up by a strong right-have man who can reform it into something that'll survive - but not in a way that will alienate all the followers.

I suspect the Mormans do something similar. Do they have a patriarch or use an elder counsel?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

The mormons have a living prophet, who personally receives revelations with a 'direct line' to God somewhat like the catholic pope.

They also believe that these rules and their changes are necessary, as God sets the rules required to spread his faith. Polygamy is usually thought of (for lds) as a temporary act used to grow his re-created church via birth. Once it became a detriment, he saw it fit to disallow.

It's a powerful idea that makes it impossible for a person to see contradictions in a constantly changing religion. Any contradictions are simply God working in mysterious ways. He said what was needed, and now something new is required

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Anonymous governing body you say 🤬☠️👁️📿🙏🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As for the last part they must of had some awesome power to enslave "demons" for so long. I wonder how the mental gymnastics worked on that one?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

At least in previous history, Soloman was probably involved. /s

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My favorite argument is that I was given access to Super God when I a child. Which gives me access to Super Heaven when I die. It's waaaaay better that regular heaven. You keep praying to regular god or whatever, you mud dwelling peasant. I'll be looking down on you from Super Heaven and laughing for Extra Eternity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Eternity just seems like so much work, when can I just die?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

but have your tried Extra Eternity for Men?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ah yes, the highest degree of the celestial kingdom, reserved only for married (m-f) Mormons, where polygamy is allowed but only for men to have multiple wives, not vice versa.

Much better than those telestial peasants. Muahaha

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When you realize that the Mormon church is a business it makes more sense.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When you realize that the ~~Mormon~~ church is a business it makes more sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

This actually makes Mormon God sort of more reasonable compared to other, stubborn gods, right? I mean making their followers lives easier by letting them to not confront civic government makes sense...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Holy (ofc not really) shit TIL

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's why Scientologists > Mormons

[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think Mormons are what Scientology wants to become: Enough power and money to control an entire state government while being accepted as regular Americans. (Mitt Romney)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The scientologists did manage to bend the arm of the entire federal government (hence my remark above which apparently irked some mormons).

See Operation Snow White if you're not familiar with the story. It's far from the only thing that sect has done.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it was Mormons upset about your post that caused down votes but your claim that Scientologists are greater than Mormons. Mormons are the greater cult.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›