this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
133 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30797 readers
2628 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I had this discussion with a friend, and we really couldn't reach a consensus.

My friend thinks Lemmy (and other Reddit-like platforms) is social media because you're interacting with other people, liking/disliking submissions, and all the content is user-generated.

I think it isn't because you're not following individual people, just communities/topics. Though I concede there are some aspects of social media present, I feel that overall it's not because my view of social media is that you're primarily following individuals.

In my view, these link aggregator + comment platforms are more like an evolution of forums which both my friend and I agreed don't meet the criteria to be considered social media (though they maintain that Reddit-like platforms are social media while I do not).

So I'm asking Lemmy now to weigh in to help settle this friendly debate.

Edit: Thanks everyone! From the comments, it sounds like my friend and I are both right and both wrong. lol. Feel free to keep chiming in, but I have to go do the 9-5 thing that pays my mortgage and cloud hosting bills.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 60 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I prefer to think of them as antisocial media.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 21 points 11 months ago

If I have to concede this argument to my buddy, that's how I'm going to do it: antisocial media 😆

[–] credo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

This is due to the anonymity of the situation and is the same direction my own answer went. I’m betting I know where this question came from, and I’d also bet courts would lean the other direction, based on the intent.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

ive had this argument going for at least a decade. I agree with you, it is not social media. i dont think forums are social media any more than usenet.

its why i calll my instance a 'nonsense aggregator', as your verbiage also alludes to.

that said, im using an mbin server.. and the microblog/twitverse piece does seem to jump into the social media arena. so my server product is now integrated with that category whether i like it or not.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 12 points 11 months ago

I love the term "nonsense aggregator" xD

Usenet's also a good comparison, and yeah, not social media.

Definitely agree on K/Mbin straddling the line because of its microblogging feature.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think that Lemmy and Reddit are 100% social media.

Common/Wiki definition:

Social media are interactive technologies that facilitate the creation, sharing and aggregation of content, ideas, interests, and other forms of expression through virtual communities and networks.

Content aggregators aren't discluded. Especially in this case where original content can and does exist.

The biggest difference, I believe, as to why Lemmy is social media and a typical forum is not, is the sorting. In a forum, the discussion is chronological as in a conversation. Here, more likes gets you more noticed. In content AND in discussion. Thus there is incentive. Whether you care about likes or not, it exist and so does incentive for social relevancy. It drives what you see.

Next becomes use case. You CAN sort the comments chronologically, but nobody does that. You CAN just read and never post, but people also do that on Instagram. Maybe you don't care about likes and aren't trying to get them. But they exist, and other users do care. If I didn't care about Facebook likes, it's still social media.

Whether you like it or not, everything is socially manipulated on this site.

Maybe you don't feel the negative effects that are typically associated with social media, and that's great. But some people here do and can get angry/upset/defensive about being down voted. Either way, those effects are not a part of the definition, although the connotation does exist. And the same could be said about any social media. Some people are more headstrong and less effected. This site is not nearly as predatory as the big ones and (depending on your communities) don't always have the intent to drive your emotional response. But those communities and users do exist.

I only have Instagram installed because there's a few people who send me (usually political) clips so we can chat about them when we hang out or text. I'm not following anyone I know. I have added a few of the creators. I've never once liked or reposted anything. So can I now say Instagram isn't social media?

Perhaps subcategories could be created, but that's besides the point. This site absolutely fits at least that one definition, which removes all connotation and defensive argument that can be had.

OP is here interacting with a network of users sharing ideas that are being sorted by popularity, then viewing other posts sorted by popularity. This is socially driven media.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you’re interacting with other users then there’s 0 question it’s social media.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 21 points 11 months ago (3 children)

By that logic every comment section under a random newspaper's article is social media. I dont think this forum esque, link feed with comment sections kind of social media that lemmy is, qualifies. Reddit didnt either for the longest time, before they started trying to form a culture and drowned in self referencing humor and repetitive one liner comments.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

I've seen people get into week long threads in the comments section of 'GoComics'

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Yes, that is also social media. Being terrible, bottom of the barrel social media doesn't make it less social media. It's still people gathering in a place discussing topics. A fleeting place discussing news articles, but still.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think you’re both right. It’s really a semantic argument over what ‘social’ means in the phrase ’social network’.

For me I tend to agree with your interpretation. I suspect it’s because the phrase came into popular use(see Google Trend screenshot below) and in reference to the Xengas, MySpaces, and Facebooks of the world that were user-centric rather than the forums and BBS type paradigms that were more topic centric.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_social_media

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If it is like writing on toilet walls,
then it is social media.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's an interesting and not inaccurate comparison lol.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're literally asking a question for other people to answer. How is that any less social media than Twitter or Facebook? People post their personal achievements all the time, etc. If you respond to me, are we not having a social interaction?

How is it not social media?

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because by that criteria every web page that's ever had a comment box is "social media".

Social media to me is, as the guy said, defined by the fact that you're following a person/persona, not a topic.

This site and other sites like it are link aggregators. If you wanted to, you could use and contribute to a link aggregator without ever writing or indeed reading a comment.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Then what about the self help communities? They largely share stories and personal experiences.

Or the meme communities largely made up of 2 heavy posters that other people follow?

Acting like Lemmy is only a link aggregator is being obtuse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We are, somehow, socializing here. And here is a kind of media. So, yes, it is a social media.

YouTube is also a social media.

Social media is a generic concept and should not be limited to Facebook/Instagram-like platforms.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's basically my friend's argument. And I can see your/their point.

My argument against it basically boils down to the scope of what you follow. Following a group/community vs individual users. e.g. If I posted this on a forum back in 1997, we'd be having this discussion in a similar manner (though probably not threaded).

That, and "social media" carries a kind of stigma from the engagement algorithms they all use. Granted, that's not a requirement for something to be technically social media, but it's definitely something most people associate with it.

[–] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 11 months ago

Algorithms is a consequence. Most of social medias are profitable, so they want you to be engaged as much as possible. At the beginning of Facebook or even the late Orkut, they were only a simple platform with no algorithm that only shows stuff like a showcase.

But as soon as Facebook starts to make money showing ads, algorithms started to become a thing. But look, it was a social media already.

Also, was Orkut a social media? Cause it was really close from what Reddit/Lemmy is today.

About forums I think there is a subtle difference. Forums are, generally speaking, communities driven with on purpose only, inside another website. For example, we can enter Acer website and go to the forums, which is used to talk about Acer products and support. Any other topic is off-topic, therefore deleted.

When forums are aggregated into a huge platform that can have different communities, with easy to-go click and follow this community, there is no specific topic and you can join any type of content you want with only one account, I call it social media, cause it's different enough from forums and the main purpose is people interacting with each other

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

I don't know anyone from Lemmy IRL. No one on here blows up my phone while I'm at work or trying to sleep. I'm not "following" anyone. I don't hate myself and everyone else every time I log on here. I'd say it is NOT social media

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Many people here are being incredibly pedantic about the words "social media", forgetting entirely that "social media" is a term invented to describe a certain type of website. Forums existed before the term was being widely used, for example, and whilst they would fit a dictionary definition of the words within the term they were always considered a separate entity to what was established as being 'social media' (e.g.: Myspace, Bebo, Facebook, etc.).

I'm with you, OP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

Yes. I also consider forums to be social media, but the good kind.

[–] pb42184@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I don't consider them social media.

Virtually nothing on it is about the poster, and that's mostly how I see social media. Even more baffling is people calling YouTube social media.

Two important caveats though.

  1. maybe r/JohnQSmith type things are prevalent just not in my experience. There's plenty of content I've never seen.

  2. The descriptivists won the day, so language is about what people do say not what people should say. If people call it that and the dictionary or whatever says something different, the speakers aren't wrong. The dictionary is wrong.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Op you can follow Reddit and Lemmy users just the same as on Facebook or Twitter. So by your own definition, Reddit and Lemmy are forms of social media.

[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

To me they are social media.

You can also follow topics/communities on other platforms, and on Reddit you can follow people/accounts.

There's not much difference.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I personally don't, because it's anonymous.

[–] FaizalR@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

It's more to a content aggregator.

[–] souperk@reddthat.com 8 points 11 months ago

IMO Lemmy is a social media, it allows people to socialize over shared interests. It doesn't need to facilitate IRL connections, even though they are likely to happen.

[–] fart_pickle@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

To me Reddit like platforms are glorified forums. And I don't mean it as an insult.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

yes, but the key difference is how its. typically used. reddit/lemmy is generally following specific topics while other forms of social media tend to follow specific people or organizations

so yes, both imo are forms of social media, but brcause of how you interact more with it is different, it feels like it's not the same.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

I believe it's in the same family of web environment as social media, but not necessarily the same clade of it.

Like comparing different romance languages.

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think it's possible to use it like social media and a few people do. One obvious/dumb example would be Lord Douchewad himself: spez.

However, IMHO 99.9999% of people who use it anonymously are social media adjacent, but not on social media.

I can see good arguments to the contrary. Semantics.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree it's likely just a matter of semantics.

Lol, what started this discussion was that I said I didn't use any social media and my buddy was like, "What? You're on Lemmy all the time".

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I get that same gotcha from people, too. Even if they are technically correct, they should be a good friend and acknowledge what you really meant. Flexing on Facebook or LinkedIn or whatever is very different from shitposting on here or reddit.

It's just awkward and unnecessary to have to say "verified user social media versus anonymous social media" when we can lump Meta, X, and Microsoft under Social Media as a blanket term.

I guess the blanket term for reddit and Lemmy and 4chan type sites could be "meme sites" or "link sharing sites" or whatever.

We need a cool new term for it, one that is easy to say and memorable. Fediverse is pretty cool, but only applies to a subset of those.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We need a cool new term for it, one that is easy to say and memorable.

Someone else in this thread used the term "nonsense aggregator" and I think that's my new favorite word for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know what else you’d call it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I would say yes, it's a form of social media. An online place where, media and ideas can be shared by anyone (subject to membership requirements if any), and where there's a built-in way for the public to discuss and rate those shared items.

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

So yes i do think it is social media. But they are more akin to the old internet, or Facebook before it got massive and bad.

For exampke? There is not a massive algorithm, especially a personalized algorithm (obviously Top and Hot are technically algorithms, but they democratically place popular posts to anyone who hasn't blocked/is following the community).

For many comparisons they are obviously social media, but for other types of comparisons I don't think it's a great match.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

My thoughts is that I come here for content, not people, so there's no social aspect to it.

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

No, not at all. I don't consider forums social media. Something like Kbin might fall into the social media category though.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

I've never seen Reddit as social media, more like a forum. Though I felt it was getting more like social media in recent years. But in one discussion such as this is was pointed out that forums pretty much are social media, they just existed before the term existed.

Then it dawned on me. Reddit didn't become more like social media - it always was one. It was just the enshitification that made it more like the other social media that I was noticing.

Lemmy is medium through which we are having social interactions. So yeah.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago

"social media" is the rebranded name for what they used to call "Web 2.0", which refers to websites where the content both comes from users and is associated with user accounts.

Both reddit and lemmy clearly fit the bill just as much as livejournal and blogger do.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Absolutely social media. On Facebook i mostly followed groups - cannabis, gardening, work related interests, local news, etc. Same as here.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Primarily anonymous forum style communication are social media like bicycles, scooters, and skateboards are vehicles.

Technically yes, but not really what people think about when they talk about vehicles.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I agree that there is a difference in how sites like Facebook and Twitter operate vs Reddit and Lemmy, BUT I think they’re still both social media. One tends to emphasize personality and individuals more. You’re encouraged to Follow/Like/Subscribe to the people or accounts themselves. People are given big avatar images and/or profile pages, you can see who they’re following. The topics themselves aren’t as important, it’s more about, “What will Taylor Swift or Elon Musk say today?”. Individuals are given much more attention.

Contrast that with Reddit/Lemmy/forums, where people are more or less reduced to a name, less-emphasized avatars and minimal profile pages. The topics themselves are emphasized and typically communities as a whole come together and do things as a group (meme wars and whathaveyou). The individual is less important and the communities/subreddits are more the “stars” of these sites. You’re encouraged more to Upvote/Downvote/Comment, so you’re interacting a little different, but it mostly just amounts to different terminology. I’ll admit though, the only person I’ve ever considered following on forum sites is u/Shittymorph. Just because his posts were so goddamn hilarious, but finding them in the wild was what made them so epic, reading all the way through only to discover…. “Goddamnit!”

I think in both cases they’re still “social media”, but they are definitely in different categories and they emphasize different parts of the experience.

[–] nfsu2@feddit.cl 5 points 11 months ago

I do not, while yes you can socialize I think it intended to be used as an aggregator unlike other sites. Much like you can discuss(forum) and shop in other social media sites.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago
load more comments