this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
407 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24405 readers
2037 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

People are scared of saying good things about Biden because it makes them a target for tankies and republicans.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see you’re new - welcome to Lemmy! If you see any tankies or republiQans you don’t want to see, block them. It’s pretty easy.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

All that does is make them more powerful because there are fewer voices pushing back against them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't see any irony in re-using Nixon's "silent majority" like trump did in 2016?

For that to be true, you have to disregard all polling, which is sadly something I've seen people doing.

Because you don't just have to explain his lack of support on social media and real life, you have to explain away his lack.of support in anonymous polling and why "he's not trump" is consistently the most popular reason for voting Biden.

He just doesn't have support, people just want to stop trump.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

The Biden aquarians live in a constant state of denialism about Biden, and it is what cost us this election.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago

A good government is a boring government. I don't want SLAMS in a congressional meeting. I want boring questions about tiny little details on spreadsheets nobody reads except for interns and wonks.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I genuinely feel like the climate is just a no win situation from a political perspective. Any real solution has pretty serious tradeoffs so either you take small low impact steps which are panned as being too little too late, or you take bold steps that hurt some significant group economically.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the group you hurt is millionaire oil executives, I wouldn't be too concerned.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean same, but inevitably it will also hurt everyone who buys oil which is pretty much everyone in America. Still it has to happen

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They can get onboard with renewables themselves. Anyone who bemoans change instead of adapting doesn't deserve our sympathy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the Democratic tent is filled with lazy cynics who actively sabotage outreach efforts, because mindlessly parroting propaganda is way easier than actual civic engagement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How much climate damage is being caused by the 2 US proxy wars, an ever expanding military which is the world's largest individual polluter?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Biden admin's main selling point on climate is bragging about how much funding they've gotten from Congress. That's a legislative achievement, but the execution part -- which is the point of their branch of government -- has been incredibly rocky. You got $7.5B in funding for EV charging yielding 8 EV chargers nationwide. And Biden has slapped big tariffs on Chinese solar panels and EVs, so that renewables will get more expensive and American carmakers who are skeptical about the EV transition will get to drag their feet even more.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

My next car purchase will at the very least be a PHEV, if not a full EV. But my current gas car is fine, so I have no immediate need to purchase one. I don't consider that as dragging my feet. I'll buy it when I need it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm with you. A car is an expensive purchase, so it's difficult to justify rushing into a new one. But I'll definitely be going either PHEV or EV on my next vehicle.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By my calculations, my car will have paid for itself in savings from not buying gas alone, after about 10 years, and I've had it for 6. And it's a PHEV with a range of only 40 miles on battery. I might have already broke even on a Leaf.

That's comparing to a gas car with 35mpg efficiency. My old car that I drove into the ground got about 17mpg so by that metric it's already paid for itself.

And I'm not taking about the difference in price between a PHEV and a pure gasoline car, I'm taking about the total price of the car. I will have saved that much money by using electric instead of gas.

If you drive a lot, especially if you drive for work, electric is a no brainer. Assuming you have somewhere to charge it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I'd say because Dems have been spending so much time telling everyone how horrible Trump is, that they forgot to mention why anyone might also consider Biden good

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Because reading any news headlines is like drinking from a firehose of liquid shit.

Reading climate change news is like drinking from a firehose of liquid misery and hopelessness.

High odds people skip all that to go play games or read a book. Or even to go outside and enjoy it while it lasts.

Edit: Not endorsing it as cool, just stating basic human behavior.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because more-left voters have marketed themselves as unreliable

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Its always the voters fault.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats the point, Biden and Co are very much right wing. People that are on the actual left do not vote for right wing politicians

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They're centrist. They're only right wing compared to you, for whom 99% of the world is "right wing".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biden's 2030 projections are not aggressive enough and are at-odds with trade relations with the largest green energy manufacturer on the planet and with the multiple large-scale military conflicts we are actively fanning. I'm assuming their 2030 projections do not account for the millions of pounds of explosives being set off in the ME and in Ukraine.

It's like a pack-a-day smoker whining about their doctor not praising them for loosing weight from dieting, even though their diet is one of those cayenne pepper and lemon juice cleanses. Like, good job with loosing 50 pounds, but if you don't stop smoking like a chimney you're still gonna die of a heart attack.

I get that we want to feel good about our political outlook but holy fuck now is not the time to be celebrating.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It is complicated, because the largest green energy manufacturer on the planet also has the largest CO2 emissions on the planet by far, three times that of the US - one could bring up the fact that they also have a lot of people, but how much of China's emissions are driven by export vs domestic consumption?

Also, the shenanigans Russia pulled with Germany has the collective West wary of becoming dependent on a hostile authoritarian country for any staple import.

I'm not saying Biden's perfect, far from it, but a strategy of "let's go chummy with this big authoritarian country, they can't attack us if our economies become codependent" has been tried here in the EU, and the results so far are hundreds of thousands dead and a nearly crashed economy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They brag about massive oil production, and we hear them.

load more comments
view more: next ›