this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
337 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69804 readers
3010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 110 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Totally not stranded, according to Boeing.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 10 months ago (3 children)

They aren't stranded because there is the emergency capsule to get them back.

Classic corporate doublespeak and half truths.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 10 months ago

They’re not stranded because the part of the capsule that isn’t working has multiple redundancy and is intended to burn up on reentry anyway.

Starliner is perfectly capable of leaving the ISS whenever they want, but they would be unable to continue collecting data on the thruster shutoff (again, because it would burn up in the atmosphere).

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Completely untrue. There are currently only 3 human-rated spacecraft docked to the ISS and none of them are set aside as some sort of emergency capsule. There's no trickery here. The number of astronauts on board is equal to the number of seats available for them to ride back home in. The only reason they aren't stranded is because Starliner is still fully capable of undocking and taking them home whenever necessary. If it wasn't, then they would actually be stranded with no alternative way back beyond straping them to the floor of Dragon.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Getting strapped to the floor of a Dragon sounds like a great plot for a space thriller

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Except the "emergency capsule" is all of them, including Starliner. Because Starliner is perfectly capable of returning to earth safely.

Because every thruster that has shut down has hot fired okay, and the known helium leaks still leave enough margin to cover several multiples of the 5 hours or so of RCS operation that you need to get to landing.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

As long as they didn’t bring any whistles with them they’ll be fine!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Just pining for the microgravity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I mean, Boeing hasn't killed them in a fireball of death, hurtling at 18 thousand kph to the earth. The media has this totally wrong, for now. Everything is totally fine, at this time.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The people in every one of these Starliner threads seemingly hoping for the worst case scenario to occur just so they can dunk on Boeing for it are disturbing

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Lol. People want Boeing to fail, because they're corrupt, lying, poorly engineered pieces of shit riding on bribed politicians. They've already deliberately caused the deaths of hundreds of people due to willful and deliberate negligence to save a buck.

Nobody's wanting the astronauts to die. And they won't, they're safe on the space station, and there are multiple options to get them home safe even if they have to abandon the POS Starliner to do it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

I'm not talking about people who just want Boeing to fail, I'm talking about the ones who think the best path to changing things is if they publicly kill two astronauts. eg. See the "morally gray" comment below

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seriously, some of the comments and their phrasing actively gave me flashbacks to my days on stan twitter.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

I wish Stan Twitter had never started his company, at all.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It’s a weird moral grey zone. Everyone has forgotten the hundreds of people Boeing murdered as a result of their desire to skirt modern safety regulations. I just flew my family across the country yesterday on one of these end-stage-capitalism products for lack of any other option.

Were I to be ash this morning, I would be forgotten too.

But if astronauts were killed, maybe the outrage would finally be enough for all the greased palms to be sheepishly shoved in pockets just long enough to get justice, ground all those affronts to safety, and jail enough executives to maybe make Boeing stop being a global safety risk and a national security concern.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Call me crazy but hoping for two innocent astronauts to die on the off-chance things improve isn't something I would consider morally gray.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

But if astronauts were killed, maybe the outrage would finally be enough

Nope. The news would die off in less than a week, short attention spans and all that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The best case scenario is that boeing is put out of business and nobody else dies for some CEO's paycheck.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 10 months ago

There are 16 thrusters on the service module and they only need like 4. One is malfunctioning. They're trying to diagnose the problem to fix it for next time since the service module burns up on reentry.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also, they totally know where their luggage is, it'll just take a couple of days to show up.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

"Oh yeah, are you sure about that? Then why does my AirTag say it's already landed on Jupiter, hmm? I'd like to speak to your manager."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

I only want to retrieve my luggage, my child

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Common mistake, AirTags don't work in space because there is no air.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That would imply there's an Apple device connected to the internet on Jupiter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

You can't prove there isn't!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Boeing:

Guys!! Good news! You're not stranded! We just can't get you back for a couple of mo...er...weeks! Yeah! That's the ticket!

Astronauts:

.....

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

"Apollo returns, a Boeing story"

"Huston, we have a problem.... "

....ok we figured it out, now guys you'll have to build a few things. First thing, you'll have to go into the garbage disposal and using plastic bags please collect small bundles of poop. Mix the poop with hydrochloric acid and make them into hexagonal shapes 6" tall by 2" thick. Now we'll need one of you to get the flu... Go find a vial left by the ruzzians. Don't worry, we got the antidote down here. Okay next collect all the snot and mix it up with 10% gelatin. Finally, you'll have to go outside and patch the heat shield using the gelatine as glue....

[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

People in prison aren't locked up, they're just taking their time to come out.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

As it turns out, actually, WE are the ones who are stranded.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Space, the safest place from Boeing assassins.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

The one place uncorrupted by capitalism!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That is clearly a meaning of "not stranded" I was previously unfamiliar with.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

They're not. The ship has 1 bad thruster, but need like a dozen to fail to make re-entry impossible. They could leave right now and everything would be just fine.

The thing is the module that's malfunctioning doesn't survive re-entry, so the only time to investigate the problem is before they head back.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

If I were thw astronauts I'd refuse to take the starliner back down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

will there be hunger games at the ISS if supplies run thin ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

I hope they sue.....

Boeing: yes, they got no chance at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe space stations should have lifeboats. Ocean liners must have them, why not the ISS?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They functionally do, at almost all points in time there are enough capsules docked to the station for all astronauts to be able to return to Earth. The starliner capsule is currently able to return if needed, they are having it stay up there a bit longer to check things out to better understand why the one thruster is bad.