this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
302 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68599 readers
3645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 281 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I like being able to check how busy a place is, but not like this. Simple head count or an average wait time is good. Using web cams is creepy overkill. Typical tech bro invasive shit.

[–] forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world 76 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Google Maps already provides this, and it's pretty handy.

[–] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I believe they do this the same way they do traffic jams, by seeing how many android phones are at the location vs. average.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

iPhones will report it too if they have Maps open.

[–] Hackworth@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

/stares in smart glasses

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 115 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Silicon Valley once again solving a problem nobody actually has.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

I don’t know about nobody. Did you see what “one horny user” wrote?

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Where's my husband? - desperate housewives of silicon valley

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So San Francisco just invented the webcam? (Btw, Google Maps already shows how busy establishments are.)

[–] howlingecko@sh.itjust.works 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Doesn’t Google Maps show trends instead of live numbers?

Edit: I used “numbers” because I wasn’t sure how to end my question. Stats? Values?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It has both.

It also doesn't have numbers, it has unlabeled columns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

"Busy", "More busy than usual",... Not absolute numbers.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Depends on the area (maybe), but I think it can do either.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 47 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They could very easily just implement some rudimentary person identification algos and output only a headcount.

Pretty sure you can do that with OpenCV.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I think Google does this with your phone. I can see how busy various places are by looking them up on Google maps. Really useful for my local Costco.

[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

So when is your Costco not busy? Genuine question as I have gone there mid-day during the week and it will still be packed. One day I went 30 min before close and the parking lot was still full.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I think you're correct, but wouldn't this only work if you are running either android, or google maps, and have location on?

Its accurate enough but still an estimate, is the point i am getting at.

Conceivably a webcam + opencv headcount would be more precise, if the cameras covered the whole space and could account for viewing the same person from a different angle.

Its like how google can give you an estimate of bus times, but if there is a local city app that specifically interfaces directly with the actually city busses, it'll be more accurate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

pretty sure they could just pull the number of open tabs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 38 points 9 months ago

“Just go to a fucking bar,” she added, seeming to balk at the purpose of the app. “And if it’s not cool you go to another bar.”

I'd rather not. A way to find a nice bar without having to visit several would be nice, not sure having it all live streamed online is the solution

[–] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know of a few bars that have/used to have web streams of the bar. Most of them started in the 90s and 00s and I can’t remember if they shut them off after a certain hour or not. Buddy of mine in Florida would go to one of these locations have a cocktail in front of the camera and wave at us while we would freezing our asses off in the northern Midwest

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Bar Code was one. Cameras streaming patrons in other franchises in other cities so you could kinda interact with them.

[–] LdyMeow@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I would walk right back out of the bar if I saw they had this.

[–] LdyMeow@sh.itjust.works 36 points 9 months ago

Good news, looks like they have an app that you can check and see which bars to avoid! Hahaha

[–] Teal@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m not one to praise Google often but I think their Popular Times feature can be handy to see how busy a place might be. This live feed video stuff is way over the top and invasive.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Same thing I thought at first. "Oh, so like that one feature from Google Maps" Nope, just some shitty tech bro tech.

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Easy choice now of which bars to avoid. Hopefully they lose business over it but I doubt it.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (4 children)

As the article indicates, it’s catering to the crowd that wants a packed bar fully of people infatuated with whatever is trending in pop culture.

Lemmy’s user base of bean loving software engineers is not that crowd.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Beans do be pretty good though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RamblingPanda 7 points 9 months ago

I mean I do like beans, but it's not love. It's a mutual feeling of appreciation. I think.

[–] techt@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qx128@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

This app got me laid,” says one five-star review on the Apple App Store. “Best way to buy tickets for events. 2nite is the truth and the future,” the horny user wrote.

This author knows what’s up. Most glorious ending to a news article I seen in a while.

[–] lets_get_off_lemmy@reddthat.com 16 points 9 months ago

This is such a drunk, stupid tech bro idea.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago

Everytime I see a Gizmodo link I get Gen-X vertigo and feel like Robin Williams in the Jumanji meme.

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I’m generally in favor of privacy, but a bar is public place. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy. Unless they’re putting cameras in the bathrooms, I don’t see how this is an issue. They likely already have security cameras that are recording, this just makes some of those publicly viewable. Other than an additional layer of convenience, how is this any different from walking into a bar, seeing it’s packed, and leaving.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The potential for misue is too great.

Security cams are not available to anyone - only the bar staff has (hopefully limited) access to the video. While everything is recorded, unless something happens you can be confident the video will end up deleted.

There's a difference from being watched by some creep through the window and being watched by a dozen creeps wanking off to you in a basment.

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would say the potential for misuse, while definitely present, is outweighed by the potential benefits.

A creep watching you from their basement is less likely to act on their dangerous impulses.

An overcrowded bar, poses a lot of risks in itself and the ability to determine how crowded the bar is without having to be physically present can mitigate your exposure to those risks.

In a crowded bar you have a higher risk of being drugged or assaulted because security and staff will likely be distracted or simply unable to notice and intervene. Also, in the event of an emergency that requires you to be able exit quickly, such as a fire or earthquake not only will it be much more difficult to leave it’s also more likely that people will panic and exasperate the problem.

Is a camera with a public live feed the best way to achieve that? No, probably not. But it’s simple, cheap, and gets the job done.

A bar is also a public venue. In a public place you have absolutely no reasonable expectation of privacy. So, while in most circumstances it’s unreasonable to expect that you’re being recorded, it’s equally unreasonable to expect that you’re not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Fuck that. It absolutely is not a norm to have anyone with an internet connection watch you drink, and is an obscene safety risk. Making a camera publicly accessible should automatically revoke your liquor license and permanently bar the owner from ever being able to apply for one again.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think this is great and don't understand why so many people balk at it. Do you think you have an expectation of privacy in a bar? And head counts doesn't tell you how many coeds are there. And this would add an additional layer of security with more eyes able to catch predators spiking drinks or starting fights.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 19 points 9 months ago (11 children)

Do you want your drunk antics livestreamed and recorded for the entire world to see forever, instead of just the few people in the bar paying attention?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I remember walking into bars and even paying the entry fee just to walk right back out 2 minutes later and waste my time going to the next one. Sometimes, it would happen multiple times in a row. It never made the experience better.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A weird new app lets San Francisco residents monitor local bars via live video feed to see what’s happening there and to check how busy the venues are.

2Nite, which launched earlier this year, uses a network of cameras at various Bay Area establishments to provide remote insights into what’s happening at those locations.

In fact, some local bar patrons have predictably been a bit perturbed (creeped out, even) by an app that remotely monitors them and streams their drunken revelry to an unknown amount of strangers on the internet.

“You should be able to let loose in a bar where Big Brother isn’t watching you,” a young woman told the Standard when asked about the app.

Lucas Harris, the co-founder of 2Nite, has said that businesses that partner with the app are in control of the cameras and that the feeds are mainly meant to “offer a glimpse of live shows at bars, clubs, and other event venues,” the Standard writes.

Harris and his co-founder, Francesco Bini, also told the outlet they had introduced live stream blurring to anonymize the feeds and keep individual partygoers from being identified.


The original article contains 356 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 47%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

That's fucking insane.

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 5 points 9 months ago

If you wanted to see how busy they are, you could just use a rating from 1-5. From what I understand they will be using cameras and streaming that. I don't really see the value of that.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I mean the camera is already there I guess the issue is it being publicly available and people being creeps.

load more comments