394
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 133 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

As somebody told me the other day, they beat Hitler, they beat Napoleon.

In case any of you lurking Trump voters here need another example to ignore of how this person has no business in government and is too ignorant to be president. You are complicit in an impending tragedy to your history and the world.

This guy says he is the one who can stop World War III and people believe it. Embarrassing and terrifying, weird just doesn’t cut it.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago

LoL, yeah.

And they beat the Nazis with a looooot of help from the US, pooring equipment into the Soviet Union, and then drafted the hell out of their country and sacrificed millions.

The Napoleonic war was when soldiers muzzle loaded their guns and prrimarily armies travelled by foot or rode horses. And kept warm in the winter by normally not going out to fight wars.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

They also very much had the advantage of knowing their terrain and both Hitler and Napoleon got cocky and kept going during winter time without being prepared for it. Hitler especially was actually making good progress until winter hit so you could almost even say that Russia took a calculated risk (even though I think it's more of a "got lucky" situation).

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Not to mention the disingenuousness of leaving out how they lost to Hindenburg and Ludendorff in between those two

[-] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Reminder that when it was Napoleon "defending" (battles vs the coalitions), he absolutely handled Emperor Alexander (Russia) ass in the field. See Austerlitz

[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

Yeah people seem to think nuclear powers cannot lose wars. Afghanistan, Vietnam and several other countries would like to chime in.

Look nuclear escalation is a theoretical option, bit in practice it's a lot harder than people think. And now with the recent sarmat test, war on Russian soil, the broad attacks on Russian infrastructure, gigantic losses and Russia relying on north Korea for production of artillery shells.. Russia looks weaker than ever.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Look nuclear escalation is a theoretical option, bit in practice it’s a lot harder than people think.

For two reasons in this case.

  1. Russia knows that the wind can blow radioactive ash across their border.

  2. Putin has grandchildren and dictators want legacies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

As if this is what was needed to prove it. Trump once answered a question about the failings of western liberalism by talking about how liberal cities on the west coast were doing badly.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

He really is a remarkably stupid person.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 124 points 10 months ago

I'm sure none of you need me to tell you this, but I feel the need to say it anyway- Trump brought up Hitler and Napoleon being unable to defeat Russia.

It's really fucking different when you are being invaded. Than when you are the invader.

[-] [email protected] 72 points 10 months ago

Someone told Trump those things happened. He has no grasp on any of the details.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wonder what his response would be if someone told him Poland never surrendered to Hitler either, moved it's government and attacked back and took back their home. Thereby Polands record against Hitler would be 1-0. It also would indicate they survived the Soviet Unions invasion of Poland as well.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Poland's leaders also never signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler. They knew better.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

The Soviets were complete jackasses to their allies. For example, they refused to allow American bombers to launch raids on Japan from eastern Russia, forcing the Allies to do a brutal island-hopping campaign to get them within range.

Then, when a few B-29s were too damaged to make the long flight back to the island and diverted to Russia, they confiscated the planes and imprisoned their crews until the end of the war.

Then, after the war, they dismantled two of the planes so they could figure out how to build a good airplane and claimed it as their own and called it the Tu-4.

Oh, and they also threw Andrei Tupolev into a gulag because he couldn't meet Stalin's insane demands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

I know, I just had to point out why it was so stupid or it would have killed me.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago

Napoleon and Hitler couldn't but Emperor Meiji (1905), Kaiser Wilhelm (1917), President Piłsudski (1920) and the Mujahideen (1980s) managed just fine, just to mention the 20th century.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

IIRC even sweden kicked some ruski butt.

Edit: Finland for sure! My memory about sweden was that it happened way before WW2.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 90 points 10 months ago
  • orange turd claims to want to pull US out of NATO, whose primary adversary is Russia

  • orange turd saying he'll stop funding Ukraine's defense against Russian invasion

  • Right-wing groups outright shown to be funded by Russia

  • orange turd has been known to be friendly with, and speak positively of, leaders of Russia, N Korea, and China... knowingly not to be friendly with NATO nations.

If this doesn't scream to you where his loyalties are and where this country is headed...

[-] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

he had a private meeting with putin where no translators or notes were allowed.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/summit-secret-happened-helsinki-putin-trump/story?id=78273344

he stole national security secrets including nuclear secrets.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65852286

how the fuck can republicans want him for president?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

how the fuck can republicans want him for president?

Maybe because the Russians backed him as their candidate in 2016, 2020, and now in 2024 (the enemy of my enemy and all that), the Russians have been buying Republican support wholesale since at least then, the Republicans have always valued money and power over all else, and the few Republicans who had qualms about it are long gone?

Just some ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

he had a private meeting with putin where no translators or notes were allowed.

Shit, somehow I forgot about this one. Unbelievable the shit this man was able to get away with.

[-] [email protected] 81 points 10 months ago
[-] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Russian Asshat

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Trump is a corrupted politician who serve rich people and corporations interests. They are an asset of the government and of the establishment. USA military spending is about 10 times bigger than russia. USA has hundreds of military facilities in europe and probably thousand around the world. They have the biggest and most advanced army in the world, they have more weapons in space than anyone else, they have the biggest mass surveillance network in the world. They are the country with the biggest corporations in the world and with the biggest leverage on worldwide markets. To think that the former ceo of usa is an asset of the "enemy" to me sounds like a poorly credible scenario and propaganda. Isn't more likely that the red and blue party are playing a good cop bad cop game to cycle in power like they have done for almost a century?

[-] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

Russia has a world class intelligence service, they've got that one thing going for them.

Trump is absolutely compromised by the Russians and has been for decades.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

Nah, it's a lot more likely that Russia's got trump by the balls. It's about a billion times more likely than your illuminati conspiracy.

Do you also believe the earth is flat? It's about the same odds I think, altho I'm no mathematician;

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press

-- Donald Trump, July 27, 2016

[-] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Ooh, look! The FSB is on Lemmy.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You're so bad at this.

Note to index's handler: do better.

[-] [email protected] 53 points 10 months ago

Trump doesn't know the difference between the Soviet Union and Russia.

Because that's what Putin wants his minions to believe.

Ukraine were largely the force that defeated the Nazis on the east front in WWII - not Russia. Both were however part of the Soviet Union at the time.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago

Ethnic Russians were the largest proportion of the killed in action by quite a margin, let's not pretend that they weren't doing their part. Ukraine was too, of course - the people that pretend Ukraine just jumped ship and shacked up with the Nazis at the first opportunity are doing an unbelievable disservice to the millions of Ukrainians that died fighting the Nazis - but the huge population disparity between Russia and every other Soviet republic does show in the data.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Nah, Ukrainians served in disproportionately large numbers considering most of Ukraine was occupied by the Nazis, but ethnic Russians contributed roughly equivalent to their proportion of the Soviet Union.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago

Fuck this worthless fucking piece of shit.

Apologies ahead of time for the coarse opinion, but this shitbag has no remote concept of the preciousness of any life aside of his own.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago

Putin should clean his fat suit more often.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago
[-] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

This should make the tankies happy right? No more funding warfare.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

It could not be clearer. Nine years ago I felt like Cassandra, now I just feel like Ren Hoek.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Ukraine can't win without Western troops.

It's that simple.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Meh, doubt that. Russian incompetence has lead to far inferior efficiency of troops and tools of war. Any advantage they once held is gone.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Quantity is a quality of its own. I’d say Ukraine is hanging on with advanced weaponry. It needs the mass to push Russian troop advances and repel their forces out of their country.

Anything else is keeping the status quo of roughly even wins and losses, which will never lead to victory in the next decade.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I believe that in the entirety of 2023 Russia claimed another 518 km despite heavy military losses? Yeah, doesn't look good for Russia.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Russia claimed and held territory. Their military leadership doesn’t particularly value human lives in this conflict and hasn’t historically either. I have no doubt that they will continue the course suffering heavy human losses and eventually find some form of victory.

Ukraine needs more people if they want any hope of staving that eventuality off. The Russians have very different ideas of fighting a war of attrition.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Ukraine needs ammo, not troops.

Human wave attacks (favoured by the Russians) are effective against opponents who have to ration their ammo, like arty rounds, due to scarcity.

If the defender has sufficient anno reserves, human wave attacks become very, very ineffective.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
394 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48660 readers
1201 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS